World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
46474
World Ranking
5750
National Ranking
565

Michael Sharpe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sharpe sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 531 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Sharpe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sharpe sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Sharpe is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Oncology, General Health Professions, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work has addressed various topics including Cancer survivorship and care, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research, Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Mental Health Treatment and Access, and Chronic Disease Management Strategies.

Some of Michael Sharpe's recent papers include:

  • Risk factors for suicide in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological autopsy studies, 2022, Evidence-Based Mental Health
  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiotherapy services in England, UK: a population-based study, 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • Major Depression and Survival in People With Cancer, 2021, Psychosomatic Medicine
  • Integrated care to address child and adolescent health in the 21st century: A clinical review, 2021, JCPP Advances
  • Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry: A new service model for the psychiatric care of general hospital inpatients, 2020, General Hospital Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Michael Sharpe include:

  • Jane Walker
  • Nicholas Magill
  • Maike van Niekerk
  • Mark Toynbee
  • Chris Frost

Their publications have appeared repeatedly in venues such as the Journal of Psychosomatic Research, General Hospital Psychiatry, Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Journal of General Internal Medicine, and BMJ Mental Health.

Best Publications

  • The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Comprehensive Approach to Its Definition and Study

    Keiji Fukuda;Stephen E. Straus;Ian Hickie;Michael C. Sharpe

  • Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review.

    J. T. O. Cavanagh;Alan J. Carson;Michael Sharpe;Stephen M. Lawrie

  • Functional somatic syndromes: one or many?

    Simon Wessely;C Nimnuan;M Sharpe

  • A report--chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research.

    M. C. Sharpe;L. C. Archard;J. E. Banatvala;L. K. Borysiewicz

  • Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial

    PD White;KA Goldsmith;AL Johnson;AL Johnson;L Potts

  • Depression after stroke and lesion location: a systematic review

    Alan J Carson;Siobhan MacHale;Kathryn Allen;Stephen M Lawrie

  • Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

    Michael Sharpe;Keith Hawton;Sue Simkin;Christina Surawy

  • Somatoform Disorders: Time for a New Approach in DSM-V

    Richard Mayou;Laurence J. Kirmayer;Greg Simon;Kurt Kroenke

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • The cognitive behavioural model of medically unexplained symptoms: a theoretical and empirical review

    Vincent Deary;Trudie Chalder;Michael Sharpe

  • Chronic Fatigue and Its Syndromes

    Simon Wessely;Matthew Hotopf;Michael Sharpe

  • Who is referred to neurology clinics? - The diagnoses made in 3781 new patients

    Jon C Stone;Alan J Carson;Roderick D D Duncan;Richard C Roberts

  • What should we say to patients with symptoms unexplained by disease? The “number needed to offend”

    Jon Stone;Wojtek Wojcik;Daniel Durrance;Alan Carson

  • Prevalence, associations, and adequacy of treatment of major depression in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected clinical data.

    Jane Walker;Christian Holm Hansen;Paul Martin;Stefan Symeonides

  • Systematic review of misdiagnosis of conversion symptoms and “hysteria”

    Jon Stone;Roger Smyth;Alan Carson;Steff Lewis

  • Do medically unexplained symptoms matter? A prospective cohort study of 300 new referrals to neurology outpatient clinics

    Alan J Carson;Brigitte Ringbauer;Jon Stone;Lesley McKenzie

  • Drug therapy for the management of cancer related fatigue

    Ollie Minton;Alison Richardson;Michael Sharpe;Matthew Hotopf

  • Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data

    Adam B Smith;Adam B Smith;Robert Rush;Lesley J Fallowfield;Galina Velikova

  • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A cognitive approach

    Christina Surawy;Ann Hackmann;Keith Hawton;Michael Sharpe

  • Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review. (vol 33, pg 395, 2003)

    A J Carson;M Sharpe;S M Lawrie

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon Stone
Jon Stone University of Edinburgh
Trudie Chalder
Trudie Chalder King's College London
Gordon D. Murray
Gordon D. Murray University of Edinburgh
Charles Warlow
Charles Warlow University of Edinburgh
Simon Wessely
Simon Wessely King's College London
Christopher R Burton
Christopher R Burton University of Sheffield
Keith Hawton
Keith Hawton University of Oxford
Per Fink
Per Fink Aarhus University
David A. Jaffray
David A. Jaffray The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Kurt Kroenke
Kurt Kroenke Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA opens the door to diverse education routes and professional opportunities. Many students consider online programs for their flexibility and accessibility, allowing them to advance their education while balancing work or family responsibilities.

For registered nurses aspiring to become nurse practitioners, adn to np bridge programs are a popular choice. These online pathways offer a career boost for nurses holding an associate degree. Similarly, experienced RNs looking to further their qualifications may opt for online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, ideal for those wanting to upskill without additional face-to-face practice components.

Not all aspiring healthcare professionals pursue clinical roles. For students interested in healthcare leadership, enrolling in top online mha programs that are cahme accredited provides a direct path into healthcare administration and management positions.

Beyond direct patient care, wellness-focused careers are in demand as well. Earning an online degree nutrition prepares graduates for roles in nutrition counseling, public health, or food science.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Sharpe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles