World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wolfgang Kneifel

Wolfgang Kneifel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 56 14534 13356 131 123 185 10086

Wolfgang Kneifel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wolfgang Kneifel between 1984 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wolfgang Kneifel published across 39 years, from 1984 to 2022, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2011. 3 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2011. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
1984 2022

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wolfgang Kneifel: publications per year, 1984 to 2022
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 2
1986 0
1987 2
1988 0
1989 2
1990 5
1991 5
1992 12
1993 5
1994 3
1995 0
1996 5
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 4
2001 6
2002 5
2003 7
2004 0
2005 2
2006 2
2007 8
2008 3
2009 4
2010 5
2011 17
2012 6
2013 7
2014 17
2015 12
2016 15
2017 9
2018 8
2019 3
2020 3
2021 2
2022 1
Total 190
Download as CSV

Wolfgang Kneifel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Kneifel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 185 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915 185
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Wolfgang Kneifel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Kneifel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235 56
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wolfgang Kneifel is affiliated with BOKU University in Austria and focuses on research within Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with additional work in Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, and Agronomy and Crop Science.

The scientist's research covers diverse topics such as Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Food and Agricultural Sciences, Meat and Animal Product Quality, Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology, Agriculture, Soil, and Plant Science, Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure, and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety.

Wolfgang Kneifel has contributed papers to various peer-reviewed journals, including:

  • Interaction of Soybean Varieties and Heat Treatments and Its Effect on Growth Performance and Nutrient Digestibility in Broiler Chickens, 2021, Animals
  • Short communication: Clostridial spore counts in vat milk of Alpine dairies, 2020, Journal of Dairy Science
  • A diet containing native or fermented wheat bran does not interfere with natural microbiota of laying hens, 2020, animal
  • Bacterial growth dynamics and corresponding metabolite levels in the extraction area of an Austrian sugar beet factory using antimicrobial treatment, 2020, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
  • Effect of Two Soybean Varieties Treated with Different Heat Intensities on Ileal and Caecal Microbiota in Broiler Chickens, 2022, Animals

Their frequent publication venues include Animals, animal, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Journal of Dairy Science, and Applied Sciences.

Kneifel collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including Konrad J. Domig, Karl Schedle, Ulrike Zitz, Florian Hemetsberger, and Christina Ukowitz.

Best Publications

  • A new view of the fish gut microbiome: Advances from next-generation sequencing

    Mahdi Ghanbari;Wolfgang Kneifel;Konrad J. Domig

  • Fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates used in bacterial diagnostics.

    M Manafi;W Kneifel;S Bascomb

  • Wheat bran-based biorefinery 1: Composition of wheat bran and strategies of functionalization

    Michael Prückler;Susanne Siebenhandl-Ehn;Silvia Apprich;Stefan Höltinger

  • The protective effect of farm milk consumption on childhood asthma and atopy: The GABRIELA study

    Georg Loss;Georg Loss;Silvia Apprich;Marco Waser;Marco Waser;Wolfgang Kneifel

  • Wheat bran-based biorefinery 2: Valorization of products

    Silvia Apprich;Özge Tirpanalan;Johannes Hell;Michael Reisinger

  • Hydrolytic fate of deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside during digestion.

    Franz Berthiller;Rudolf Krska;Konrad J. Domig;Wolfgang Kneifel

  • Effect of galacto-oligosaccharide supplementation on human faecal microflora and on survival and persistence of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 in the gastrointestinal tract

    M. Alander;J. Mättö;W. Kneifel;M. Johansson

  • Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery

    Ljubomir Petricevic;Konrad J. Domig;Franz Josef Nierscher;Michael J. Sandhofer

  • Seafood biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria – A review

    Mahdi Ghanbari;Mansooreh Jami;Konrad J. Domig;Wolfgang Kneifel

  • Microbial Contamination of Medicinal Plants - A Review

    Wolfgang Kneifel;Erich Czech;Brigitte Kopp

  • β-Glucosidase activities of lactic acid bacteria: mechanisms, impact on fermented food and human health.

    Herbert Michlmayr;Wolfgang Kneifel

  • Safety of Novel Microbes for Human Consumption: Practical Examples of Assessment in the European Union.

    Theodor Brodmann;Akihito Endo;Miguel Gueimonde;Gabriel Vinderola

  • Listeria monocytogenes in Aquatic Food Products—A Review

    Mansooreh Jami;Mahdi Ghanbari;Marija Zunabovic;Konrad J. Domig

  • Methods used for the isolation, enumeration, characterisation and identification of Enterococcus spp. 2. Pheno- and genotypic criteria.

    Konrad J Domig;Helmut K Mayer;Wolfgang Kneifel

  • Purification and characterization of two novel β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus reuteri

    Thu-Ha Nguyen;Barbara Splechtna;Marlene Steinböck;Wolfgang Kneifel

  • Microflora and acidification properties of yogurt and yogurt-related products fermented with commercially available starter cultures

    W. Kneifel;Doris Jaros;F. Erhard

  • Influence of a synbiotic mixture consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus 74-2 and a fructooligosaccharide preparation on the microbial ecology sustained in a simulation of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME reactor).

    M Gmeiner;W Kneifel;K D Kulbe;R Wouters

  • Comparison of broth microdilution, Etest, and agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Lactobacillus acidophilus group members.

    Sigrid Mayrhofer;Konrad J. Domig;Christiane Mair;Ulrike Zitz

  • Microbiological Criteria of Random Samples of Spices and Herbs Retailed on the Austrian Market.

    Wolfgang Kneifel;Erika Berger

  • Characterization and molecular cloning of a heterodimeric beta-galactosidase from the probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus R22.

    Thu-Ha Nguyen;Barbara Splechtna;Stanimira Krasteva;Wolfgang Kneifel

Frequent Co-Authors

Seppo Salminen
Seppo Salminen University of Turku
Erik Reimhult
Erik Reimhult BOKU University
Thomas Rosenau
Thomas Rosenau BOKU University
Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer
Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer University of Basel
Dietmar Haltrich
Dietmar Haltrich BOKU University
Akihito Endo
Akihito Endo Tokyo University of Agriculture
Geert Huys
Geert Huys KU Leuven
Willem M. de Vos
Willem M. de Vos Wageningen University & Research
Jon Genuneit
Jon Genuneit Leipzig University
Rudolf Krska
Rudolf Krska BOKU University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A foundation in Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of in-demand healthcare careers—many of which now offer flexible online study options. Students can explore specialized fields such as medical imaging, nutrition, or clinical support roles, depending on their interests and career goals.

For those interested in diagnostic healthcare, ultrasound tech school programs online provide comprehensive training in sonography. Similarly, online radiology tech programs are a cost-effective path to careers in medical imaging and analysis.

Nutrition-focused students can pursue graduate-level study with the best dietetics programs offered online, preparing for registered dietitian or nutritionist roles. Additionally, those aiming to work directly with patients can consider online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid, making healthcare education more accessible and affordable.

With these diverse pathways, online degrees help students strengthen their scientific background and transition into rewarding healthcare professions.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Kneifel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles