World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
11212
World Ranking
11529
National Ranking
4976

Chhinder P. Sodhi publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chhinder P. Sodhi sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 145 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Chhinder P. Sodhi D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chhinder P. Sodhi sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chhinder P. Sodhi is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in Medicine and Nursing. Their scholarly work spans several subfields including Nutrition and Dietetics, Epidemiology, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics, notably in Infant Nutrition and Health, Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues, Child Nutrition and Water Access, Cytomegalovirus and Herpesvirus Research, Breastfeeding Practices and Influences, Gastrointestinal Disorders and Treatments, and Congenital Gastrointestinal and Neural Anomalies.

Chhinder P. Sodhi's recent papers demonstrate a focus on gastrointestinal and neonatal health, including studies related to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and related infectious factors as well as pediatric nutritional impacts. Notable publications include:

  • Multi-strain probiotic administration decreases necrotizing enterocolitis severity and alters the epigenetic profile in mice, 2024, Pediatric Research
  • Cytomegalovirus Worsens Necrotizing Enterocolitis Severity in Mice via Increased Toll-Like Receptor 4 Signaling, 2025, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Heat exposure impacts the incidence of intussusception in children, 2025, Pediatric Research
  • Biofilm probiotics for NEC: promise, pitfalls, and pathways to translation, 2025, Pediatric Research
  • Segmental cholestasis drives global hepatic fibrosis: lessons from the sBDL model in weaned rats, 2025, Pediatric Research

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Sodhi include Daphne H. Klerk, Hannah Moore, Cody Tragesser, Johannes W. Duess, and Maame Efua Sampah. These collaborations suggest an active engagement in multidisciplinary research teams.

Publication venues where their work frequently appears include Pediatric Research, with four papers published there, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and The Journal of Immunology.

Best Publications

  • Necrotizing enterocolitis: new insights into pathogenesis and mechanisms.

    Diego F. Niño;Chhinder P. Sodhi;David J. Hackam

  • A critical role for TLR4 in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis by modulating intestinal injury and repair.

    Cynthia L. Leaphart;Jaime Cavallo;Steven C. Gribar;Selma Cetin

  • Attenuation of pulmonary ACE2 activity impairs inactivation of des-Arg9 bradykinin/BKB1R axis and facilitates LPS-induced neutrophil infiltration.

    Chhinder P Sodhi;Christine Wohlford-Lenane;Yukihiro Yamaguchi;Thomas Prindle

  • Intestinal Epithelial Toll-Like Receptor 4 Regulates Goblet Cell Development and Is Required for Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Mice

    Chhinder P. Sodhi;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Matthew D. Neal;Matthew D. Neal;Richard Siggers;Richard Siggers;Shonan Sho;Shonan Sho

  • Reciprocal Expression and Signaling of TLR4 and TLR9 in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Necrotizing Enterocolitis

    Steven C. Gribar;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Ward M. Richardson;Rahul J. Anand

  • Breast milk protects against the development of necrotizing enterocolitis through inhibition of Toll Like Receptor 4 in the intestinal epithelium via activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor

    Misty Good;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Charlotte E. Egan;Amin Afrazi

  • Endothelial TLR4 activation impairs intestinal microcirculatory perfusion in necrotizing enterocolitis via eNOS-NO-nitrite signaling.

    Ibrahim Yazji;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Elizabeth K. Lee;Misty Good

  • Toll-Like Receptor-4 Inhibits Enterocyte Proliferation via Impaired β-Catenin Signaling in Necrotizing Enterocolitis

    Chhinder P. Sodhi;Xia–Hua Shi;Ward M. Richardson;Zachary S. Grant

  • The role of epithelial Toll-like receptor signaling in the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation

    Steven C. Gribar;Rahul J. Anand;Chhinder P. Sodhi;David J. Hackam

  • Toll-like receptor 4 is expressed on intestinal stem cells and regulates their proliferation and apoptosis via the p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis.

    Matthew D. Neal;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Hongpeng Jia;Mitchell Dyer

  • Toll-like receptor 4–mediated lymphocyte influx induces neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis

    Charlotte E. Egan;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Misty Good;Joyce Lin

  • Hypoxia causes an increase in phagocytosis by macrophages in a HIF‐1α‐dependent manner

    Rahul J. Anand;Steven C. Gribar;Jun Li;Jeff W. Kohler

  • Lipopolysaccharide Clearance, Bacterial Clearance, and Systemic Inflammatory Responses Are Regulated by Cell Type–Specific Functions of TLR4 during Sepsis

    Meihong Deng;Melanie J. Scott;Patricia Loughran;Gregory Gibson

  • No longer an innocent bystander: epithelial toll-like receptor signaling in the development of mucosal inflammation.

    Steven C. Gribar;Ward M. Richardson;Chhinder P. Sodhi;David J. Hackam

  • Isoniazid- and rifampicin-induced oxidative hepatic injury : protection by N-acetylcysteine

    S Attri;S V Rana;K Vaiphei;C P Sodhi

  • Amniotic fluid inhibits Toll-like receptor 4 signaling in the fetal and neonatal intestinal epithelium

    Misty Good;Richard H. Siggers;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Amin Afrazi

  • The human milk oligosaccharide 2′-fucosyllactose attenuates the severity of experimental necrotising enterocolitis by enhancing mesenteric perfusion in the neonatal intestine

    Misty Good;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Yukihiro Yamaguchi;Hongpeng Jia

  • Toll-like Receptor 4-mediated Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Intestinal Crypts Induces Necrotizing Enterocolitis

    Amin Afrazi;Maria F. Branca;Chhinder P. Sodhi;Misty Good

  • Toll-Like Receptor–Mediated Intestinal Inflammatory Imbalance in the Pathogenesis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis

    David J. Hackam;Chhinder P. Sodhi

  • Study of oxidative-stress in isoniazid-rifampicin induced hepatic injury in young rats.

    C. P. Sodhi;S. V. Rana;S. K. Mehta;K. Vaiphei

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Hackam
David J. Hackam Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Timothy R. Billiar
Timothy R. Billiar University of Pittsburgh
Peter Wipf
Peter Wipf University of Pittsburgh
Donna B. Stolz
Donna B. Stolz University of Pittsburgh
Jeffrey L. Brodsky
Jeffrey L. Brodsky University of Pittsburgh
Kyle Bibby
Kyle Bibby University of Notre Dame
Anthony J. Bauer
Anthony J. Bauer Liberty University
Lester Kobzik
Lester Kobzik Harvard University
Mikhail V. Pletnikov
Mikhail V. Pletnikov Johns Hopkins University
Eugene B. Chang
Eugene B. Chang University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized career pathways in healthcare and science. Many students are now opting for online nutrition degree programs, which offer flexibility and prepare graduates for roles in nutrition counseling, wellness, or health education.

Advanced roles in mental health are also in demand. Psych nurse practitioner programs are designed for those interested in psychiatric care, blending biochemistry knowledge with clinical skills.

For those seeking leadership opportunities, an MBA with a focus on healthcare can be a wise investment. However, it is essential to consider healthcare mba cost when selecting a program, as tuition and fees can vary significantly.

Additionally, careers in medical coding are growing rapidly. Understanding the differences between ccs vs cpc certification can help you choose the right path for credentials, salary prospects, and job stability within healthcare administration.

Best Scientists Citing Chhinder P. Sodhi

Trending Scientists