World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 9924 9311 5106 4717 686 42211

Ping Wang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ping Wang between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ping Wang published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 19.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 118 publications in 2023. 140 of the 1,128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 118. Peak 118 publications in 2023. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 24 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 51 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 117 publications 2023: 118 publications 2024: 80 publications 2025: 60 publications
1968 2025

1,128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ping Wang: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 4
1991 13
1992 13
1993 10
1994 13
1995 14
1996 13
1997 13
1998 21
1999 18
2000 24
2001 24
2002 18
2003 14
2004 23
2005 13
2006 15
2007 17
2008 18
2009 20
2010 30
2011 28
2012 31
2013 31
2014 31
2015 33
2016 39
2017 42
2018 32
2019 41
2020 51
2021 44
2022 117
2023 118
2024 80
2025 60
Total 1,128
Download as CSV

Ping Wang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 686 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 686
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ping Wang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ping Wang is affiliated with the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The scientist's work prominently features subfields such as Molecular Biology, Immunology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Surgery.

The core topics covered in Ping Wang's research include Immune Response and Inflammation, Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment, Inflammasome and immune disorders, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, MicroRNA in disease regulation, Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms, and Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation.

Ping Wang has contributed to numerous publications, including articles in key venues:

  • Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Release mechanisms of major DAMPs, 2021, APOPTOSIS
  • Neutrophil phenotypes and functions in cancer: A consensus statement, 2022, The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • TLR4 signalling via Piezo1 engages and enhances the macrophage mediated host response during bacterial infection, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Emerging phagocytosis checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy, 2023, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Shock
  • Molecular Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Ping Wang has collaborated regularly with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Monowar Aziz
  • Atsushi Murao
  • Max Brenner
  • Asha Jacob
  • Gaifeng Ma

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • DAMPs and NETs in Sepsis

    Naomi-Liza Denning;Monowar Aziz;Steven D. Gurien;Steven D. Gurien;Ping Wang

  • Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) triggers inflammatory responses in hemorrhagic shock and sepsis

    Xiaoling Qiang;Weng Lang Yang;Rongqian Wu;Mian Zhou

  • Differential alterations in plasma IL-6 and TNF levels after trauma and hemorrhage.

    A. Ayala;Ping Wang;Z. F. Ba;M. M. Perrin

  • Current trends in inflammatory and immunomodulatory mediators in sepsis

    Monowar Aziz;Asha Jacob;Weng Lang Yang;Akihisa Matsuda

  • The complex pattern of cytokines in sepsis. Association between prostaglandins, cachectin, and interleukins.

    Wolfgang Ertel;Mary H. Morrison;Ping Wang;Zheng F. Ba

  • Mechanism of the Anti-inflammatory Effect of Curcumin: PPAR-γ Activation

    Asha Jacob;Rongqian Wu;Mian Zhou;Ping Wang

  • Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors.

    Tinghui Yin;Ping Wang;Rongqin Zheng;Bowen Zheng

  • A novel method to determine the engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages using pHrodo succinimidyl ester

    Michael Miksa;Hidefumi Komura;Hidefumi Komura;Rongqian Wu;Rongqian Wu;Kavin G. Shah;Kavin G. Shah

  • Ubiquitin Proteasome Dysfunction in Human Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathies

    Jaime M. Predmore;Ping Wang;Frank Davis;Sarah Bartolone

  • Bacterial endotoxin stimulates macrophages to release HMGB1 partly through CD14- and TNF-dependent mechanisms.

    Guoqian Chen;Jianhua Li;Mahendar Ochani;Beatriz Rendon-Mitchell

  • Mechanism of hepatocellular dysfunction during hyperdynamic sepsis

    P. Wang;I. H. Chaudry

  • Ghrelin attenuates sepsis-induced acute lung injury and mortality in rats.

    Rongqian Wu;Weifeng Dong;Mian Zhou;Fangming Zhang

  • The anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin in an experimental model of sepsis is mediated by up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ*

    Aqeel M. Siddiqui;Xiaoxuan Cui;Rongqian Wu;Weifeng Dong

  • Organ dysfunction following hemorrhage and sepsis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches (Review).

    D Jarrar;I H Chaudry;P Wang

  • Administration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in vivo depresses endothelium-dependent relaxation.

    Ping Wang;Z. F. Ba;I. H. Chaudry

  • Ghrelin Down-regulates Proinflammatory Cytokines in Sepsis Through Activation of the Vagus Nerve

    Rongqian Wu;Weifeng Dong;Xiaoxuan Cui;Mian Zhou

  • Hemorrhage produces depression in microvascular blood flow which persists despite fluid resuscitation.

    Wang P;Hauptman Jg;Chaudry Ih

  • Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia [Intervention Protocol]

    Zongdao Shi;Huixu Xie;Ping Wang;Yan Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

Irshad H. Chaudry
Irshad H. Chaudry University of Alabama at Birmingham
Kirby I. Bland
Kirby I. Bland University of Alabama at Birmingham
Haichao Wang
Haichao Wang Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
William G. Cioffi
William G. Cioffi Brown University
Alfred Ayala
Alfred Ayala Brown University
Kevin J. Tracey
Kevin J. Tracey Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Jianhua Li
Jianhua Li Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Huan Yang
Huan Yang Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Jie Fan
Jie Fan University of Pittsburgh
Luis Ulloa
Luis Ulloa Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering careers in medicine or healthcare, online degree options offer flexible and cost-effective alternatives to traditional study. There is a growing demand for nurses and healthcare professionals, making now an ideal time to explore online pathways to launch or advance your medical career.

Prospective nurses may want to look into affordable nursing programs online as a starting point. These programs are perfect for those seeking flexibility without compromising quality or affordability.

For registered nurses aiming to complete their bachelor’s degree at a lower cost, the cheapest rn to bsn options can speed up career advancement. Likewise, nurses seeking terminal degrees can consider the cheapest dnp programs for affordable doctoral-level credentials.

Even non-nurses can pursue nursing through direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online, which provide a fast track into the nursing profession for those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree.

Ultimately, whether you are just beginning or seeking advanced qualifications, there are many flexible online degree and career pathways available in the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Ping Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles