World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
42211
World Ranking
9924
National Ranking
5106

Ping Wang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 686 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ping Wang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ping Wang is affiliated with the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The scientist's work prominently features subfields such as Molecular Biology, Immunology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Surgery.

The core topics covered in Ping Wang's research include Immune Response and Inflammation, Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment, Inflammasome and immune disorders, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, MicroRNA in disease regulation, Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms, and Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation.

Ping Wang has contributed to numerous publications, including articles in key venues:

  • Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Release mechanisms of major DAMPs, 2021, APOPTOSIS
  • Neutrophil phenotypes and functions in cancer: A consensus statement, 2022, The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • TLR4 signalling via Piezo1 engages and enhances the macrophage mediated host response during bacterial infection, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Emerging phagocytosis checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy, 2023, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Shock
  • Molecular Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Ping Wang has collaborated regularly with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Monowar Aziz
  • Atsushi Murao
  • Max Brenner
  • Asha Jacob
  • Gaifeng Ma

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • DAMPs and NETs in Sepsis

    Naomi-Liza Denning;Monowar Aziz;Steven D. Gurien;Steven D. Gurien;Ping Wang

  • Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) triggers inflammatory responses in hemorrhagic shock and sepsis

    Xiaoling Qiang;Weng Lang Yang;Rongqian Wu;Mian Zhou

  • Differential alterations in plasma IL-6 and TNF levels after trauma and hemorrhage.

    A. Ayala;Ping Wang;Z. F. Ba;M. M. Perrin

  • Current trends in inflammatory and immunomodulatory mediators in sepsis

    Monowar Aziz;Asha Jacob;Weng Lang Yang;Akihisa Matsuda

  • The complex pattern of cytokines in sepsis. Association between prostaglandins, cachectin, and interleukins.

    Wolfgang Ertel;Mary H. Morrison;Ping Wang;Zheng F. Ba

  • Mechanism of the Anti-inflammatory Effect of Curcumin: PPAR-γ Activation

    Asha Jacob;Rongqian Wu;Mian Zhou;Ping Wang

  • Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors.

    Tinghui Yin;Ping Wang;Rongqin Zheng;Bowen Zheng

  • A novel method to determine the engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages using pHrodo succinimidyl ester

    Michael Miksa;Hidefumi Komura;Hidefumi Komura;Rongqian Wu;Rongqian Wu;Kavin G. Shah;Kavin G. Shah

  • Ubiquitin Proteasome Dysfunction in Human Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathies

    Jaime M. Predmore;Ping Wang;Frank Davis;Sarah Bartolone

  • Bacterial endotoxin stimulates macrophages to release HMGB1 partly through CD14- and TNF-dependent mechanisms.

    Guoqian Chen;Jianhua Li;Mahendar Ochani;Beatriz Rendon-Mitchell

  • Mechanism of hepatocellular dysfunction during hyperdynamic sepsis

    P. Wang;I. H. Chaudry

  • Ghrelin attenuates sepsis-induced acute lung injury and mortality in rats.

    Rongqian Wu;Weifeng Dong;Mian Zhou;Fangming Zhang

  • Incidence and prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in a Large U.S. Managed Care Health Plan, 2008-2015

    Kevin L. Winthrop;Theodore K. Marras;Jennifer Adjemian;Haixin Zhang

  • The anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin in an experimental model of sepsis is mediated by up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ*

    Aqeel M. Siddiqui;Xiaoxuan Cui;Rongqian Wu;Weifeng Dong

  • Organ dysfunction following hemorrhage and sepsis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches (Review).

    D Jarrar;I H Chaudry;P Wang

  • Administration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in vivo depresses endothelium-dependent relaxation.

    Ping Wang;Z. F. Ba;I. H. Chaudry

  • Ghrelin Down-regulates Proinflammatory Cytokines in Sepsis Through Activation of the Vagus Nerve

    Rongqian Wu;Weifeng Dong;Xiaoxuan Cui;Mian Zhou

  • Hemorrhage produces depression in microvascular blood flow which persists despite fluid resuscitation.

    Wang P;Hauptman Jg;Chaudry Ih

  • Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia [Intervention Protocol]

    Zongdao Shi;Huixu Xie;Ping Wang;Yan Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

Irshad H. Chaudry
Irshad H. Chaudry University of Alabama at Birmingham
Kirby I. Bland
Kirby I. Bland University of Alabama at Birmingham
Haichao Wang
Haichao Wang Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
William G. Cioffi
William G. Cioffi Brown University
Alfred Ayala
Alfred Ayala Brown University
Kevin J. Tracey
Kevin J. Tracey Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Jianhua Li
Jianhua Li Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Huan Yang
Huan Yang Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Jie Fan
Jie Fan University of Pittsburgh
Luis Ulloa
Luis Ulloa Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering careers in medicine or healthcare, online degree options offer flexible and cost-effective alternatives to traditional study. There is a growing demand for nurses and healthcare professionals, making now an ideal time to explore online pathways to launch or advance your medical career.

Prospective nurses may want to look into affordable nursing programs online as a starting point. These programs are perfect for those seeking flexibility without compromising quality or affordability.

For registered nurses aiming to complete their bachelor’s degree at a lower cost, the cheapest rn to bsn options can speed up career advancement. Likewise, nurses seeking terminal degrees can consider the cheapest dnp programs for affordable doctoral-level credentials.

Even non-nurses can pursue nursing through direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online, which provide a fast track into the nursing profession for those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree.

Ultimately, whether you are just beginning or seeking advanced qualifications, there are many flexible online degree and career pathways available in the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Ping Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles