World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 115 4549 4267 2470 2288 911 48777

Irshad H. Chaudry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Irshad H. Chaudry between 1969 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Irshad H. Chaudry published across 56 years, from 1969 to 2024, averaging 16.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2006. 6 of the 916 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2006. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 4 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 7 publications 1975: 9 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 12 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 10 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 21 publications 1992: 27 publications 1993: 30 publications 1994: 30 publications 1995: 36 publications 1996: 38 publications 1997: 29 publications 1998: 45 publications 1999: 48 publications 2000: 43 publications 2001: 45 publications 2002: 34 publications 2003: 39 publications 2004: 35 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 65 publications 2007: 44 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications
1969 2024

916 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Irshad H. Chaudry: publications per year, 1969 to 2024
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 4
1971 0
1972 1
1973 3
1974 7
1975 9
1976 8
1977 3
1978 6
1979 4
1980 12
1981 8
1982 10
1983 7
1984 10
1985 11
1986 8
1987 7
1988 6
1989 4
1990 14
1991 21
1992 27
1993 30
1994 30
1995 36
1996 38
1997 29
1998 45
1999 48
2000 43
2001 45
2002 34
2003 39
2004 35
2005 25
2006 65
2007 44
2008 33
2009 23
2010 11
2011 7
2012 6
2013 8
2014 8
2015 12
2016 3
2017 4
2018 4
2019 3
2020 4
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 4
Total 916
Download as CSV

Irshad H. Chaudry publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irshad H. Chaudry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 901–920 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 911 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145 911
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Irshad H. Chaudry D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irshad H. Chaudry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 115
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Irshad H. Chaudry is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Other important subfields include Neurology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, and Emergency Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics within their disciplines. These include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation

Recent publications by Irshad H. Chaudry cover a range of relevant subjects in critical care and related medical fields. Selected papers include:

  • Expert consensus on the monitoring and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression, 2022, Military Medical Research
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury and Regeneration in the Liver-Shock and Surgery-Associated Changes, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Potential Immunotherapeutic Targets for Hypoxia Due to COVI-Flu, 2020, Shock
  • 17α-Ethinyl estradiol-3-sulfate increases survival and hemodynamic functioning in a large animal model of combined traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock: a randomized control trial, 2021, Critical Care
  • Operative Trauma and Blood Loss - Impact on Tumor Growth and Recurrence, 2020, Shock

Collaboration is an important aspect of their research activity. Frequent coauthors include Elise Pretzsch, Florian Bösch, Jens Werner, Martin K. Angele, and Andrew R. Mayer.

Their articles often appear in respected journals such as Shock, Critical Care, and The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, which are key publication venues for studies in trauma, critical illness, and intensive care medicine.

Best Publications

  • Sepsis and septic shock—A review of laboratory models and a proposal

    Keith A. Wichterman;Arthur E. Baue;Irshad H. Chaudry

  • Cecal ligation and puncture.

    William J Hubbard;Mashkoor Choudhry;Martin G Schwacha;Jeffrey D Kerby

  • Evaluation of factors affecting mortality rate after sepsis in a murine cecal ligation and puncture model.

    Baker Cc;Chaudry Ih;Gaines Ho;Baue Ae

  • Effect of gender and sex hormones on immune responses following shock.

    Martin K. Angele;Martin G. Schwacha;Alfred Ayala;Irshad H. Chaudry;Irshad H. Chaudry

  • Effect of sepsis on tissue adenine nucleotide levels.

    Irshad H. Chaudry;Keith A. Wichterman;Arthur E. Baue

  • Females in proestrus state maintain splenic immune functions and tolerate sepsis better than males.

    Rene Zellweger;Matthias W. Wichmann;Matthias W. Wichmann;Alfred Ayala;Alfred Ayala;Susan Stein

  • Evidence favoring the role of the gut as a cytokine-generating organ in rats subjected to hemorrhagic shock.

    Edwin A. Deitch;Dazhong Xu;Lisa Franko;Alfred Ayala

  • Differential alterations in plasma IL-6 and TNF levels after trauma and hemorrhage.

    A. Ayala;Ping Wang;Z. F. Ba;M. M. Perrin

  • The complex pattern of cytokines in sepsis. Association between prostaglandins, cachectin, and interleukins.

    Wolfgang Ertel;Mary H. Morrison;Ping Wang;Zheng F. Ba

  • Depression of Cellular Immunity After Major Injury: Its Association With Posttraumatic Complications and Its Reversal With Immunomodulation

    Eugen Faist;Thomas S. Kupper;Christopher C. Baker;Irshaud H. Chaudry

  • Differential induction of apoptosis in lymphoid tissues during sepsis: variation in onset, frequency, and the nature of the mediators

    Alfred Ayala;Crystal D. Herdon;Donna L. Lehman;Carol A. Ayala

  • Gender differences in sepsis: Cardiovascular and immunological aspects

    Martin K Angele;Sebastian Pratschke;William J Hubbard;Irshad H Chaudry

  • Hemorrhage without tissue trauma produces immunosuppression and enhances susceptibility to sepsis.

    Rabie N. Stephan;Thomas S. Kupper;Alexander S. Geha;Arthur E. Baue

  • Enhanced immune responses in females, as opposed to decreased responses in males following haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation.

    Matthias W. Wichmann;Matthias W. Wichmann;René Zellweger;Catherine M. DeMaso;Alfred Ayala;Alfred Ayala

  • Gender differences in the inflammatory response and survival following haemorrhage and subsequent sepsis.

    Michael D. Diodato;Markus W. Knöferl;Markus W. Knöferl;Martin G. Schwacha;Kirby I. Bland

  • Hemorrhage induces an increase in serum TNF which is not associated with elevated levels of endotoxin.

    Alfred Ayala;Michelle M Perrin;Daniel R Meldrum;Wolfgang Ertel

  • Application of genome-wide expression analysis to human health and disease

    J. Perren Cobb;Michael N. Mindrinos;Carol Miller-Graziano;Steve E. Calvano

  • Influence of sex and age on mods and cytokines after multiple injuries.

    Michael Frink;Hans-Christoph Pape;Martijn van Griensven;Christian Krettek

  • The Gut: A Cytokine-generating Organ In Systemic Inflammation?

    Mark R. Mainous;Wolfgang Ertel;Irshad H. Chaudry;Edwin A. Deitch

  • Mechanism of hepatocellular dysfunction during hyperdynamic sepsis

    P. Wang;I. H. Chaudry

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirby I. Bland
Kirby I. Bland University of Alabama at Birmingham
Alfred Ayala
Alfred Ayala Brown University
Ping Wang
Ping Wang Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Martin G. Schwacha
Martin G. Schwacha The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Mashkoor A. Choudhry
Mashkoor A. Choudhry Loyola University Chicago
William G. Cioffi
William G. Cioffi Brown University
Daniel G. Remick
Daniel G. Remick Boston University
Chun-Shiang Chung
Chun-Shiang Chung Brown University
Lyle L. Moldawer
Lyle L. Moldawer University of Florida
James A. Lederer
James A. Lederer Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If studying Medicine in the USA sparks your interest in the broader healthcare field, online degrees offer flexible options to expand your expertise and career opportunities. Many healthcare professionals are turning to advanced roles in areas like administration, informatics, and clinical leadership through affordable online study options.

For those interested in leading hospitals or health systems, exploring the most affordable online mha programs can open doors to in-demand management positions. Likewise, nurses considering the highest clinical practice qualifications might pursue one of the cheapest dnp programs online, which offer advanced curriculum and greater autonomy.

Pharmacists aiming for a doctorate can enroll in pharm d online programs that fit their schedules and budgets. Meanwhile, the digital revolution in healthcare is fueling demand for experts in data management—earning an online mhi can prepare you for cutting-edge roles in health information management.

Each online pathway presents a unique opportunity to tailor your education, enhance your credentials, and pursue impactful careers in America’s dynamic health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Irshad H. Chaudry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles