World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
115
Citations
48777
World Ranking
4549
National Ranking
2471

Irshad H. Chaudry publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irshad H. Chaudry sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 911 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Irshad H. Chaudry D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irshad H. Chaudry sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Irshad H. Chaudry is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Other important subfields include Neurology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, and Emergency Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics within their disciplines. These include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation

Recent publications by Irshad H. Chaudry cover a range of relevant subjects in critical care and related medical fields. Selected papers include:

  • Expert consensus on the monitoring and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression, 2022, Military Medical Research
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury and Regeneration in the Liver-Shock and Surgery-Associated Changes, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Potential Immunotherapeutic Targets for Hypoxia Due to COVI-Flu, 2020, Shock
  • 17α-Ethinyl estradiol-3-sulfate increases survival and hemodynamic functioning in a large animal model of combined traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock: a randomized control trial, 2021, Critical Care
  • Operative Trauma and Blood Loss - Impact on Tumor Growth and Recurrence, 2020, Shock

Collaboration is an important aspect of their research activity. Frequent coauthors include Elise Pretzsch, Florian Bösch, Jens Werner, Martin K. Angele, and Andrew R. Mayer.

Their articles often appear in respected journals such as Shock, Critical Care, and The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, which are key publication venues for studies in trauma, critical illness, and intensive care medicine.

Best Publications

  • Sepsis and septic shock—A review of laboratory models and a proposal

    Keith A. Wichterman;Arthur E. Baue;Irshad H. Chaudry

  • Cecal ligation and puncture.

    William J Hubbard;Mashkoor Choudhry;Martin G Schwacha;Jeffrey D Kerby

  • Evaluation of factors affecting mortality rate after sepsis in a murine cecal ligation and puncture model.

    Baker Cc;Chaudry Ih;Gaines Ho;Baue Ae

  • Effect of gender and sex hormones on immune responses following shock.

    Martin K. Angele;Martin G. Schwacha;Alfred Ayala;Irshad H. Chaudry;Irshad H. Chaudry

  • Effect of sepsis on tissue adenine nucleotide levels.

    Irshad H. Chaudry;Keith A. Wichterman;Arthur E. Baue

  • Females in proestrus state maintain splenic immune functions and tolerate sepsis better than males.

    Rene Zellweger;Matthias W. Wichmann;Matthias W. Wichmann;Alfred Ayala;Alfred Ayala;Susan Stein

  • Evidence favoring the role of the gut as a cytokine-generating organ in rats subjected to hemorrhagic shock.

    Edwin A. Deitch;Dazhong Xu;Lisa Franko;Alfred Ayala

  • Differential alterations in plasma IL-6 and TNF levels after trauma and hemorrhage.

    A. Ayala;Ping Wang;Z. F. Ba;M. M. Perrin

  • The complex pattern of cytokines in sepsis. Association between prostaglandins, cachectin, and interleukins.

    Wolfgang Ertel;Mary H. Morrison;Ping Wang;Zheng F. Ba

  • Depression of Cellular Immunity After Major Injury: Its Association With Posttraumatic Complications and Its Reversal With Immunomodulation

    Eugen Faist;Thomas S. Kupper;Christopher C. Baker;Irshaud H. Chaudry

  • Differential induction of apoptosis in lymphoid tissues during sepsis: variation in onset, frequency, and the nature of the mediators

    Alfred Ayala;Crystal D. Herdon;Donna L. Lehman;Carol A. Ayala

  • Gender differences in sepsis: Cardiovascular and immunological aspects

    Martin K Angele;Sebastian Pratschke;William J Hubbard;Irshad H Chaudry

  • Hemorrhage without tissue trauma produces immunosuppression and enhances susceptibility to sepsis.

    Rabie N. Stephan;Thomas S. Kupper;Alexander S. Geha;Arthur E. Baue

  • Enhanced immune responses in females, as opposed to decreased responses in males following haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation.

    Matthias W. Wichmann;Matthias W. Wichmann;René Zellweger;Catherine M. DeMaso;Alfred Ayala;Alfred Ayala

  • Gender differences in the inflammatory response and survival following haemorrhage and subsequent sepsis.

    Michael D. Diodato;Markus W. Knöferl;Markus W. Knöferl;Martin G. Schwacha;Kirby I. Bland

  • Hemorrhage induces an increase in serum TNF which is not associated with elevated levels of endotoxin.

    Alfred Ayala;Michelle M Perrin;Daniel R Meldrum;Wolfgang Ertel

  • Application of genome-wide expression analysis to human health and disease

    J. Perren Cobb;Michael N. Mindrinos;Carol Miller-Graziano;Steve E. Calvano

  • Influence of sex and age on mods and cytokines after multiple injuries.

    Michael Frink;Hans-Christoph Pape;Martijn van Griensven;Christian Krettek

  • The Gut: A Cytokine-generating Organ In Systemic Inflammation?

    Mark R. Mainous;Wolfgang Ertel;Irshad H. Chaudry;Edwin A. Deitch

  • Mechanism of hepatocellular dysfunction during hyperdynamic sepsis

    P. Wang;I. H. Chaudry

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirby I. Bland
Kirby I. Bland University of Alabama at Birmingham
Alfred Ayala
Alfred Ayala Brown University
Ping Wang
Ping Wang Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Martin G. Schwacha
Martin G. Schwacha The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Mashkoor A. Choudhry
Mashkoor A. Choudhry Loyola University Chicago
William G. Cioffi
William G. Cioffi Brown University
Daniel G. Remick
Daniel G. Remick Boston University
Chun-Shiang Chung
Chun-Shiang Chung Brown University
Lyle L. Moldawer
Lyle L. Moldawer University of Florida
James A. Lederer
James A. Lederer Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If studying Medicine in the USA sparks your interest in the broader healthcare field, online degrees offer flexible options to expand your expertise and career opportunities. Many healthcare professionals are turning to advanced roles in areas like administration, informatics, and clinical leadership through affordable online study options.

For those interested in leading hospitals or health systems, exploring the most affordable online mha programs can open doors to in-demand management positions. Likewise, nurses considering the highest clinical practice qualifications might pursue one of the cheapest dnp programs online, which offer advanced curriculum and greater autonomy.

Pharmacists aiming for a doctorate can enroll in pharm d online programs that fit their schedules and budgets. Meanwhile, the digital revolution in healthcare is fueling demand for experts in data management—earning an online mhi can prepare you for cutting-edge roles in health information management.

Each online pathway presents a unique opportunity to tailor your education, enhance your credentials, and pursue impactful careers in America’s dynamic health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Irshad H. Chaudry

Trending Scientists