World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel G. Remick

Daniel G. Remick

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 109 522 483 318 289 451 41414
Medicine 109 5810 5456 3117 2890 457 41530

Daniel G. Remick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel G. Remick between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel G. Remick published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2005. 9 of the 471 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2005. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 18 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
1984 2025

471 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel G. Remick: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 2
1986 3
1987 3
1988 7
1989 18
1990 14
1991 18
1992 18
1993 13
1994 15
1995 15
1996 15
1997 8
1998 15
1999 10
2000 12
2001 23
2002 10
2003 10
2004 16
2005 24
2006 24
2007 14
2008 14
2009 16
2010 16
2011 15
2012 13
2013 16
2014 14
2015 4
2016 8
2017 5
2018 8
2019 7
2020 6
2021 4
2022 4
2023 3
2024 4
2025 5
Total 471
Download as CSV

Daniel G. Remick publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Remick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 442–451 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 451 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31 451
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel G. Remick D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Remick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23 109
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel G. Remick is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and specializes in medicine, with a primary focus on sepsis diagnosis and treatment. Their research spans several interconnected subfields, including epidemiology, surgery, immunology, physiology, and infectious diseases.

Their work covers multiple key topics, among which are:

  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • COVID-19 Diagnosis Using AI
  • Surgical Simulation and Training

Recent publications by Daniel G. Remick include:

  • "ChatGPT 3.5 fails to write appropriate multiple choice practice exam questions," 2023, Academic Pathology
  • "Cytokine Drizzle-The Rationale for Abandoning "Cytokine Storm"," 2021, Shock
  • "Sepsis Biomarkers," 2021, Methods in Molecular Biology
  • "Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee," 2020, Academic Pathology
  • "Universal Precautions Provide Appropriate Protection during Autopsies of Patients with Infectious Diseases," 2020, American Journal of Pathology

Daniel G. Remick frequently collaborates with authors such as Allan E. Stolarski, Jiyoun Kim, Katherine Wee, Qiuyang Zhang, and Bradley E. Hiller. These partnerships contribute to the breadth and depth of their research output.

Their research is often published in recognized venues, including:

  • Shock
  • Academic Pathology
  • American Journal Of Pathology
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Methods in Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans

    Steve E. Calvano;Wenzhong Xiao;Daniel R. Richards;Ramon M. Felciano

  • Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibody to Human Tumor Necrosis Factor α in Patients With Sepsis Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter Clinical Trial

    E Abraham;R Wunderink;H Silverman;T M Perl

  • Cytokines and the brain: implications for clinical psychiatry.

    Ziad Kronfol;Daniel G. Remick

  • Role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the pathophysiologic alterations after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat.

    L M Colletti;D G Remick;G D Burtch;S L Kunkel

  • Endothelial cell gene expression of a neutrophil chemotactic factor by TNF-alpha, LPS, and IL-1 beta.

    R. M. Strieter;S. L. Kunkel;H. J. Showell;D. G. Remick

  • Prostaglandin E2 regulates macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor gene expression.

    S L Kunkel;M Spengler;M A May;R Spengler

  • Cellular and molecular regulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by pentoxofylline

    Robert M. Strieter;Daniel G. Remick;Daniel G. Remick;Peter A. Ward;Peter A. Ward;Robert N. Spengler;Robert N. Spengler

  • The Pathogenesis of Sepsis

    Deborah J. Stearns-Kurosawa;Marcin F. Osuchowski;Catherine Valentine;Shinichiro Kurosawa

  • Pathophysiology of Sepsis

    Daniel G. Remick

  • Circulating Cytokine/Inhibitor Profiles Reshape the Understanding of the SIRS/CARS Continuum in Sepsis and Predict Mortality

    Marcin F. Osuchowski;Kathy Welch;Javed Siddiqui;Daniel G. Remick

  • Comparison of the mortality and inflammatory response of two models of sepsis: lipopolysaccharide vs. cecal ligation and puncture.

    Daniel G. Remick;David E. Newcomb;Gerald L. Bolgos;Douglas R. Call

  • Sepsis: Multiple Abnormalities, Heterogeneous Responses, and Evolving Understanding

    Kendra N. Iskander;Marcin F. Osuchowski;Deborah J. Stearns-Kurosawa;Shinichiro Kurosawa

  • Acute Inflammatory Response to Endotoxin in Mice and Humans

    Shannon Copeland;H. Shaw Warren;Stephen F. Lowry;Steve E. Calvano

  • Regulation of interleukin 8 gene expression by oxidant stress.

    L E DeForge;A M Preston;E Takeuchi;J Kenney

  • Six at six: Interleukin-6 measured 6 H after the initiation of sepsis predicts mortality over 3 days

    Daniel G. Remick;Gerald R. Bolgos;Javed Siddiqui;Jungsoon Shin

  • Stimulation of alpha-adrenergic receptor augments the production of macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor.

    R N Spengler;R M Allen;D G Remick;R M Strieter

  • Acute pancreatitis: models, markers, and mediators.

    Jill Granger;Daniel Remick

  • Anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody therapy fails to prevent lethality after cecal ligation and puncture or endotoxemia.

    Mark Eskandari;G. Bolgos;C. Miller;D. T. Nguyen

  • IL-8 in septic shock, endotoxemia, and after IL-1 administration.

    K J Van Zee;L E DeForge;E Fischer;M A Marano

  • Interleukin-1 receptor blockade improves survival and hemodynamic performance in Escherichia coli septic shock, but fails to alter host responses to sublethal endotoxemia.

    E Fischer;M A Marano;K J Van Zee;C S Rock

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Kunkel
Steven L. Kunkel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Javed Siddiqui
Javed Siddiqui University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert M. Strieter
Robert M. Strieter University of Virginia
Lyle L. Moldawer
Lyle L. Moldawer University of Florida
Irshad H. Chaudry
Irshad H. Chaudry University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jon S. Friedland
Jon S. Friedland St George's, University of London
Ronald G. Tompkins
Ronald G. Tompkins Harvard University
George E. Griffin
George E. Griffin St George's, University of London
Wenzhong Xiao
Wenzhong Xiao Harvard University
Henry V. Baker
Henry V. Baker University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Immunology in the USA opens doors to various healthcare careers, many of which can be pursued through specialized online programs. For those interested in nursing pathways, exploring the easy admission LPN programs can be a great starting point. These programs provide foundational nursing knowledge with flexible entry requirements, making them accessible for many students.

Advancing further, aspiring family nurse practitioners can benefit from the easiest FNP program options online, which offer straightforward admission processes paired with comprehensive clinical training. These programs prepare students for broad healthcare roles that often intersect with immunology, particularly in preventive care and chronic disease management.

For those focusing on mental health, top online PMHNP programs with best clinical placement rates provide excellent pathways, ensuring practical experience alongside academic learning. This combination is crucial for effective psychiatric care and understanding immune-related mental health conditions.

Cost is often a key consideration, and the cheapest psychiatric nurse practitioner programs offer budget-friendly options without compromising education quality. These programs support career growth for those passionate about immunology's role in psychiatric health.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel G. Remick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles