World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
96
Citations
30995
World Ranking
338
National Ranking
24

Tobias Kuemmerle publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Kuemmerle sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 279 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tobias Kuemmerle D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Kuemmerle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tobias Kuemmerle is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their research is positioned within the broad field of environmental science, where they have contributed extensively across various subfields and topics.

The main subfields of study for Kuemmerle include global and planetary change, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, ecological modeling, and management, monitoring, policy, and law. Their work spans multiple interconnected themes, emphasizing the interactions between human activities and natural ecosystems.

Kuemmerle's research topics cover several important areas:

  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy

Their recent publications include:

  • "Disentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical deforestation," 2022, Science
  • "Ten facts about land systems for sustainability," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Tropical forest loss enhanced by large-scale land acquisitions," 2020, Nature Geoscience
  • "Land-cover change in the Caucasus Mountains since 1987 based on the topographic correction of multi-temporal Landsat composites," 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe," 2020, Diversity and Distributions

Kuemmerle collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Matthias Baumann
  • Patrick Meyfroidt
  • Arash Ghoddousi
  • Ana Buchadas
  • Benjamin Bleyhl

Their work has been published in a range of outlets, with a concentration of studies appearing in:

  • Diversity and Distributions
  • Biological Conservation
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • Environmental Research Letters

Best Publications

  • A review of the application of optical and radar remote sensing data fusion to land use mapping and monitoring

    Neha P. Joshi;Matthias Baumann;Andrea Ehammer;Rasmus Fensholt

  • Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward

    Jörn Fischer;David James Abson;Van Butsic;Van Butsic;M Jahi Chappell;M Jahi Chappell

  • Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature

    Sebastiaan Luyssaert;Mathilde Jammet;Paul C. Stoy;Stephen Estel

  • Rewilding complex ecosystems.

    Andrea Perino;Henrique M. Pereira;Henrique M. Pereira;Laetitia M. Navarro;Néstor Fernández

  • Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series.

    Stephan Estel;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle;Camilo Alcántara;Christian Levers

  • Middle-range theories of land system change

    P. Meyfroidt;R. Roy Chowdhury;A. de Bremond;A. de Bremond;E.C. Ellis

  • Disentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical deforestation

    Unknown

  • The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: a systematic review of the evidence

    Tobias Plieninger;Hélène Draux;Nora Fagerholm;Nora Fagerholm;Claudia Bieling

  • Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine

    Matthias Baumann;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle;Marine Elbakidze;Marine Elbakidze;Mutlu Ozdogan

  • Ten facts about land systems for sustainability

    Unknown

  • Challenges for land system science

    Mark D.A. Rounsevell;Bas Pedroli;Karl-Heinz Erb;Marc Gramberger

  • Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes

    Joern Fischer;Tibor Hartel;Tibor Hartel;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle

  • Where are Europe's last primary forests?

    Francesco Maria Sabatini;Sabina Burrascano;William S. Keeton;Christian Levers

  • Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010

    Martin Rudbeck Jepsen;Tobias Kuemmerle;Daniel Müller;Daniel Müller;Karlheinz Erb

  • Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally

    Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle;Karlheinz Erb;Patrick Meyfroidt;Daniel Müller;Daniel Müller

  • Cross-border Comparison of Post-socialist Farmland Abandonment in the Carpathians

    Tobias Kuemmerle;Patrick Hostert;Volker C. Radeloff;Sebastian van der Linden

  • Mapping abandoned agriculture with multi-temporal MODIS satellite data

    Camilo Alcantara;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle;Alexander V. Prishchepov;Volker C. Radeloff

  • A Pixel-Based Landsat Compositing Algorithm for Large Area Land Cover Mapping

    Patrick Griffiths;Sebastian van der Linden;Tobias Kuemmerle;Patrick Hostert

  • Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification

    Laura Kehoe;Laura Kehoe;Alfredo Romero-Muñoz;Ester Polaina;Lyndon Estes;Lyndon Estes

  • Effects of institutional changes on land use: agricultural land abandonment during the transition from state-command to market-driven economies in post-Soviet Eastern Europe

    Alexander V Prishchepov;Alexander V Prishchepov;Volker C Radeloff;Matthias Baumann;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle

  • A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity

    Karl-Heinz Erb;Helmut Haberl;Martin Rudbeck Jepsen;Tobias Kuemmerle

  • Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images

    Jan Knorn;Andreas Rabe;Volker C. Radeloff;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle

  • Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward.

    J. Fischer;D. J. Abson;V. Butsic;M. J. Chappell

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Müller
Daniel Müller Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Volker C. Radeloff
Volker C. Radeloff University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alexander V. Prishchepov
Alexander V. Prishchepov University of Copenhagen
Patrick Hostert
Patrick Hostert Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Karl-Heinz Erb
Karl-Heinz Erb BOKU University
Patrick Meyfroidt
Patrick Meyfroidt Université Catholique de Louvain
Helmut Haberl
Helmut Haberl BOKU University
Pieter Johannes Verkerk
Pieter Johannes Verkerk European Forest Institute
Tobias Plieninger
Tobias Plieninger University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution frequently explore related fields through flexible online education. Many choose to pursue degrees that build on their scientific background, such as Library and Information Science, Speech-Language Pathology, or Nursing, each with unique educational pathways and career prospects.

Affordability is a common concern. The cost of mlis degree us is often a deciding factor for students considering library science, but many programs offer competitive tuition rates to help reduce financial barriers.

For those interested in healthcare, becoming a speech-language pathologist or nurse can start with online education. There are numerous asha accredited online slp programs that meet rigorous professional standards and allow students to balance school with other commitments. Prospective SLPs from unrelated academic backgrounds may benefit from speech pathology bridge programs online.

Similarly, individuals considering a transition to nursing can explore online absn programs for non nurses, which provide an accelerated pathway to a nursing career even for those without prior nursing experience. These options illustrate the diverse, affordable, and accessible avenues available for students seeking to expand their scientific and professional horizons.

Best Scientists Citing Tobias Kuemmerle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles