World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 33 908 905 8 8 84 7532
Ecology and Evolution 39 6308 6087 124 121 83 7537

Volodymyr Trotsiuk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Volodymyr Trotsiuk between 2012 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Volodymyr Trotsiuk published across 14 years, from 2012 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 10 of the 100 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
2012 2025

100 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Volodymyr Trotsiuk: publications per year, 2012 to 2025
Year Publications
2012 1
2013 0
2014 4
2015 4
2016 2
2017 11
2018 6
2019 13
2020 18
2021 16
2022 10
2023 5
2024 6
2025 4
Total 100
Download as CSV

Volodymyr Trotsiuk publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Volodymyr Trotsiuk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 82–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 83 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236 83
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Volodymyr Trotsiuk D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Volodymyr Trotsiuk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254 39
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Volodymyr Trotsiuk is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research spans several interconnected areas within environmental science, focusing extensively on forest ecology, plant water relations, and the impact of climate on forest productivity.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Climate-change-driven growth decline of European beech forests (2022, Communications Biology)
  • The 2018 European heatwave led to stem dehydration but not to consistent growth reductions in forests (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Assessing the response of forest productivity to climate extremes in Switzerland using model-data fusion (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Historical Disturbances Determine Current Taxonomic, Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity of Saproxylic Beetle Communities in Temperate Primary Forests (2020, Ecosystems)
  • Accuracy, realism and general applicability of European forest models (2022, Global Change Biology)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Volodymyr Trotsiuk include Miroslav Svoboda, Vojtěch Čada, Pavel Janda, Martin Mikoláš, and Marcus Schaub. These collaborations have contributed to a focused body of work across multiple facets of forest and environmental science.

Volodymyr Trotsiuk publishes regularly in several venues, most notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Global Change Biology
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Their primary field of study is Environmental Science, with emphasis on these subfields:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Insect Science
  • Plant Science

Key research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Forest Management and Policy

Best Publications

  • Forest disturbances under climate change

    Rupert Seidl;Dominik Thom;Markus Kautz;Dario Martin-Benito;Dario Martin-Benito

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Old World megadroughts and pluvials during the Common Era

    Edward R. Cook;Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Keith R. Briffa

  • A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality

    Maxime Cailleret;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Lucía Desoto

  • Climate-change-driven growth decline of European beech forests

    Unknown

  • The 2018 European heatwave led to stem dehydration but not to consistent growth reductions in forests

    Unknown

  • Age structure and disturbance dynamics of the relic virgin beech forest Uholka (Ukrainian Carpathians)

    Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Martina L. Hobi;Martina L. Hobi;Brigitte Commarmot

  • Age, competition, disturbance and elevation effects on tree and stand growth response of primary Picea abies forest to climate

    Irantzu Primicia;Jesús Julio Camarero;Pavel Janda;Vojtĕch Čada

  • Early-warning signals of individual tree mortality based on annual radial growth

    Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Vasilis Dakos;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M.R. Robert;Elisabeth M.R. Robert

  • The historical disturbance regime of mountain Norway spruce forests in the Western Carpathians and its influence on current forest structure and composition.

    Pavel Janda;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Martin Mikoláš;Radek Bače

  • Landscape‐level variability in historical disturbance in primary Picea abies mountain forests of the Eastern Carpathians, Romania

    Miroslav Svoboda;Pavel Janda;Radek Bače;Shawn Fraver

  • When a tree dies in the forest: Scaling climate-driven tree mortality to ecosystem water and carbon fluxes

    William R. L. Anderegg;Jordi Martinez-Vilalta;Maxime Cailleret;Jesus Julio Camarero

  • Contrasting effects of environmental change on the radial growth of co-occurring beech and fir trees across Europe.

    Michal Bosela;Martin Lukac;Daniele Castagneri;Róbert Sedmák

  • More ways than one: Mixed-severity disturbance regimes foster structural complexity via multiple developmental pathways

    Garrett W. Meigs;Robert C. Morrissey;Radek Bače;Oleh Chaskovskyy

  • A mixed severity disturbance regime in the primary Picea abies (L.) Karst. forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians

    Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Miroslav Svoboda;Pavel Janda;Martin Mikolas

  • Large‐scale disturbance legacies and the climate sensitivity of primary Picea abies forests

    Jonathan S. Schurman;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Radek Bače;Vojtěch Čada

  • Assessing the response of forest productivity to climate extremes in Switzerland using model─data fusion

    Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Florian Hartig;Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Flurin Babst;Flurin Babst

  • Ecosystem dynamics and management after forest die-off: a global synthesis with conceptual state-and-transition models

    Richard C. Cobb;Katinka X. Ruthrof;Katinka X. Ruthrof;David D. Breshears;Francisco Lloret

  • The climatic drivers of primary Picea forest growth along the Carpathian arc are changing under rising temperatures

    Jonathan S. Schurman;Flurin Babst;Jesper Björklund;Jesper Björklund;Miloš Rydval

  • Primary forest distribution and representation in a Central European landscape: Results of a large-scale field-based census

    Martin Mikoláš;Karol Ujházy;Marián Jasík;Michal Wiezik

  • Accuracy, realism and general applicability of European forest models

    Unknown

  • A Combined Tree Ring and Vegetation Model Assessment of European Forest Growth Sensitivity to Interannual Climate Variability

    S. Klesse;S. Klesse;S. Klesse;F. Babst;F. Babst;F. Babst;S. Lienert;S. Lienert;R. Spahni;R. Spahni

  • Profile of tree-related microhabitats in European primary beech-dominated forests

    Daniel Kozák;Martin Mikoláš;Marek Svitok;Radek Bače

Frequent Co-Authors

Miroslav Svoboda
Miroslav Svoboda Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Thomas A. Nagel
Thomas A. Nagel University of Ljubljana
Flurin Babst
Flurin Babst University of Arizona
David I. Forrester
David I. Forrester Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Arthur Gessler
Arthur Gessler ETH Zurich
David Frank
David Frank University of Arizona
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson University of St Andrews
Marcus Schaub
Marcus Schaub Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Harald Bugmann
Harald Bugmann ETH Zurich
Thomas Kitzberger
Thomas Kitzberger National University of Comahue

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in ecology, evolution, or even healthcare cross-fields, online degrees offer flexible options for advancing your education and career. Online nursing programs, for example, have become a popular choice for those wanting a science-related profession with real-world impact.

Fast-track options such as the 6-month rn to bsn program can help working nurses advance quickly, while bridge programs like the adn to np programs online allow registered nurses with associate degrees to pursue advanced practice roles. If you’re starting from a non-nursing background, you might consider online direct entry msn programs designed for those with bachelor’s degrees in other subjects, such as biology or environmental science.

Choosing the right university is crucial. Comparing options like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn can help you find a program tailored to your needs, whether you prioritize flexibility, reputation, or support services. These varied pathways highlight the diverse directions your science background can take—both inside and outside the traditional lab or field environment.

Best Scientists Citing Volodymyr Trotsiuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles