World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
33
Citations
7532
World Ranking
908
National Ranking
8

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
7537
World Ranking
6308
National Ranking
124

Volodymyr Trotsiuk publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Volodymyr Trotsiuk sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 83 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Volodymyr Trotsiuk D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Volodymyr Trotsiuk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Volodymyr Trotsiuk is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research spans several interconnected areas within environmental science, focusing extensively on forest ecology, plant water relations, and the impact of climate on forest productivity.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Climate-change-driven growth decline of European beech forests (2022, Communications Biology)
  • The 2018 European heatwave led to stem dehydration but not to consistent growth reductions in forests (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Assessing the response of forest productivity to climate extremes in Switzerland using model-data fusion (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Historical Disturbances Determine Current Taxonomic, Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity of Saproxylic Beetle Communities in Temperate Primary Forests (2020, Ecosystems)
  • Accuracy, realism and general applicability of European forest models (2022, Global Change Biology)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Volodymyr Trotsiuk include Miroslav Svoboda, Vojtěch Čada, Pavel Janda, Martin Mikoláš, and Marcus Schaub. These collaborations have contributed to a focused body of work across multiple facets of forest and environmental science.

Volodymyr Trotsiuk publishes regularly in several venues, most notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Global Change Biology
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Their primary field of study is Environmental Science, with emphasis on these subfields:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Insect Science
  • Plant Science

Key research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Forest Management and Policy

Best Publications

  • Forest disturbances under climate change

    Rupert Seidl;Dominik Thom;Markus Kautz;Dario Martin-Benito;Dario Martin-Benito

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Old World megadroughts and pluvials during the Common Era

    Edward R. Cook;Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Keith R. Briffa

  • A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality

    Maxime Cailleret;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Lucía Desoto

  • Climate-change-driven growth decline of European beech forests

    Unknown

  • The 2018 European heatwave led to stem dehydration but not to consistent growth reductions in forests

    Unknown

  • Age structure and disturbance dynamics of the relic virgin beech forest Uholka (Ukrainian Carpathians)

    Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Martina L. Hobi;Martina L. Hobi;Brigitte Commarmot

  • Age, competition, disturbance and elevation effects on tree and stand growth response of primary Picea abies forest to climate

    Irantzu Primicia;Jesús Julio Camarero;Pavel Janda;Vojtĕch Čada

  • Early-warning signals of individual tree mortality based on annual radial growth

    Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Vasilis Dakos;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M.R. Robert;Elisabeth M.R. Robert

  • The historical disturbance regime of mountain Norway spruce forests in the Western Carpathians and its influence on current forest structure and composition.

    Pavel Janda;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Martin Mikoláš;Radek Bače

  • Landscape‐level variability in historical disturbance in primary Picea abies mountain forests of the Eastern Carpathians, Romania

    Miroslav Svoboda;Pavel Janda;Radek Bače;Shawn Fraver

  • When a tree dies in the forest: Scaling climate-driven tree mortality to ecosystem water and carbon fluxes

    William R. L. Anderegg;Jordi Martinez-Vilalta;Maxime Cailleret;Jesus Julio Camarero

  • Contrasting effects of environmental change on the radial growth of co-occurring beech and fir trees across Europe.

    Michal Bosela;Martin Lukac;Daniele Castagneri;Róbert Sedmák

  • More ways than one: Mixed-severity disturbance regimes foster structural complexity via multiple developmental pathways

    Garrett W. Meigs;Robert C. Morrissey;Radek Bače;Oleh Chaskovskyy

  • A mixed severity disturbance regime in the primary Picea abies (L.) Karst. forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians

    Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Miroslav Svoboda;Pavel Janda;Martin Mikolas

  • Large‐scale disturbance legacies and the climate sensitivity of primary Picea abies forests

    Jonathan S. Schurman;Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Radek Bače;Vojtěch Čada

  • Assessing the response of forest productivity to climate extremes in Switzerland using model─data fusion

    Volodymyr Trotsiuk;Florian Hartig;Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Flurin Babst;Flurin Babst

  • Ecosystem dynamics and management after forest die-off: a global synthesis with conceptual state-and-transition models

    Richard C. Cobb;Katinka X. Ruthrof;Katinka X. Ruthrof;David D. Breshears;Francisco Lloret

  • The climatic drivers of primary Picea forest growth along the Carpathian arc are changing under rising temperatures

    Jonathan S. Schurman;Flurin Babst;Jesper Björklund;Jesper Björklund;Miloš Rydval

  • Primary forest distribution and representation in a Central European landscape: Results of a large-scale field-based census

    Martin Mikoláš;Karol Ujházy;Marián Jasík;Michal Wiezik

  • Accuracy, realism and general applicability of European forest models

    Unknown

  • A Combined Tree Ring and Vegetation Model Assessment of European Forest Growth Sensitivity to Interannual Climate Variability

    S. Klesse;S. Klesse;S. Klesse;F. Babst;F. Babst;F. Babst;S. Lienert;S. Lienert;R. Spahni;R. Spahni

  • Profile of tree-related microhabitats in European primary beech-dominated forests

    Daniel Kozák;Martin Mikoláš;Marek Svitok;Radek Bače

Frequent Co-Authors

Miroslav Svoboda
Miroslav Svoboda Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Thomas A. Nagel
Thomas A. Nagel University of Ljubljana
Flurin Babst
Flurin Babst University of Arizona
David I. Forrester
David I. Forrester Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Arthur Gessler
Arthur Gessler ETH Zurich
David Frank
David Frank University of Arizona
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson University of St Andrews
Marcus Schaub
Marcus Schaub Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Harald Bugmann
Harald Bugmann ETH Zurich
Thomas Kitzberger
Thomas Kitzberger National University of Comahue

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in ecology, evolution, or even healthcare cross-fields, online degrees offer flexible options for advancing your education and career. Online nursing programs, for example, have become a popular choice for those wanting a science-related profession with real-world impact.

Fast-track options such as the 6-month rn to bsn program can help working nurses advance quickly, while bridge programs like the adn to np programs online allow registered nurses with associate degrees to pursue advanced practice roles. If you’re starting from a non-nursing background, you might consider online direct entry msn programs designed for those with bachelor’s degrees in other subjects, such as biology or environmental science.

Choosing the right university is crucial. Comparing options like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn can help you find a program tailored to your needs, whether you prioritize flexibility, reputation, or support services. These varied pathways highlight the diverse directions your science background can take—both inside and outside the traditional lab or field environment.

Best Scientists Citing Volodymyr Trotsiuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles