World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6608
World Ranking
6399
National Ranking
2277

Peter Eichhubl publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Eichhubl sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 179 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Peter Eichhubl D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Eichhubl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Eichhubl is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within engineering and earth sciences, with a particular focus on geophysics and mechanical engineering.

The main fields of study for Eichhubl include:

  • Engineering
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, Eichhubl's work addresses several subfields, notably:

  • Geophysics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Geology

The research topics covered by Eichhubl encompass:

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Drilling and Well Engineering

Eichhubl has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • Hydrogen Storage Assessment in Depleted Oil Reservoir and Saline Aquifer, 2022, Energies
  • Poroelastic models for fault reactivation in response to concurrent injection and production in stacked reservoirs, 2020, Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
  • Mineral precipitation as a mechanism of fault core growth, 2020, Journal of Structural Geology
  • Origin of low salinity, high volume produced waters in the Wolfcamp Shale (Permian), Delaware Basin, USA, 2020, Applied Geochemistry
  • Opening-mode fracturing and cementation during hydrocarbon generation in shale: An example from the Barnett Shale, Delaware Basin, West Texas, 2022, AAPG Bulletin

Frequent coauthors working alongside Eichhubl include:

  • Owen Callahan
  • András Fall
  • Shuvajit Bhattacharya
  • Mahdi Haddad
  • Elizabeth A. Horne

Publications by Eichhubl commonly appear in these venues:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Structural Geology
  • Report of investigations/Report of investigations - University of Texas at Austin. Bureau of Economic Geology
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Natural fractures in shale: A review and new observations

    Julia F. W. Gale;Stephen E. Laubach;Jon E. Olson;Peter Eichhubl

  • Geological and mathematical framework for failure modes in granular rock

    Atilla Aydin;Ronaldo I. Borja;Peter Eichhubl

  • Authigenic carbonate formation at hydrocarbon seeps in continental margin sediments: A comparative study

    Thomas H. Naehr;Peter Eichhubl;Victoria J. Orphan;Martin Hovland

  • A 48 m.y. history of fracture opening, temperature, and fluid pressure: Cretaceous Travis Peak Formation, East Texas basin

    S. P. Becker;Peter Eichhubl;Stephen E Laubach;Robert M Reed

  • Evolution of a hydrocarbon migration pathway along basin-bounding faults: Evidence from fault cement

    James R. Boles;Peter Eichhubl;Grant Garven;Jim Chen

  • Dilation bands: A new form of localized failure in granular media

    Xavier Du Bernard;Peter Eichhubl;Atilla Aydin

  • Structural and diagenetic control of fluid migration and cementation along the Moab fault, Utah

    Peter Eichhubl;Nicholas C. Davatzes;Stephen P. Becker

  • Pure and shear-enhanced compaction bands in Aztec Sandstone

    Peter Eichhubl;John N. Hooker;Stephen E. Laubach

  • Structural diagenesis

    Unknown

  • Testing the basin-centered gas accumulation model using fluid inclusion observations: Southern Piceance Basin, Colorado

    András Fall;Peter Eichhubl;Stephen P. Cumella;Robert J. Bodnar

  • Paleo-fluid flow and deformation in the Aztec Sandstone at the Valley of Fire, Nevada—Evidence for the coupling of hydrogeologic, diagenetic, and tectonic processes

    Peter Eichhubl;W. Lansing Taylor;David D. Pollard;Atilla Aydin

  • Natural hydraulic fracturing of tight-gas sandstone reservoirs, Piceance Basin, Colorado

    András Fall;Peter Eichhubl;Robert J. Bodnar;Stephen E. Laubach

  • Connecting microstructural attributes and permeability from 3D tomographic images of in situ shear-enhanced compaction bands using multiscale computations

    WaiChing Sun;José E. Andrade;John W. Rudnicki;Peter Eichhubl

  • Hydrogen Storage Assessment in Depleted Oil Reservoir and Saline Aquifer

    Unknown

  • Geomechanical analysis of fluid injection and seismic fault slip for the Mw4.8 Timpson, Texas, earthquake sequence

    Zhiqiang Fan;Peter Eichhubl;Julia F. W. Gale

  • Structural evolution of fault zones in sandstone by multiple deformation mechanisms: Moab fault, southeast Utah

    Nicholas C. Davatzes;Peter Eichhubl;Atilla Aydin

  • Direct simulation of supercritical gas flow in complex nanoporous media and prediction of apparent permeability

    Christopher J. Landry;Maša Prodanović;Peter Eichhubl

  • Focused fluid flow along faults in the Monterey Formation, coastal California

    Peter Eichhubl;James R. Boles

  • Submarine landslides in the Santa Barbara Channel as potential tsunami sources

    H. G. Greene;L. Y. Murai;P. Watts;N. A. Maher

  • Chemical and Hydrodynamic Mechanisms for Long-Term Geological Carbon Storage

    Susan J Altman;Behdad Aminzadeh;Matthew T. Balhoff;Phillip C. Bennett

  • Structural control of fluid flow: offshore fluid seepage in the Santa Barbara Basin, California

    P Eichhubl;P Eichhubl;H.G Greene;H.G Greene;T Naehr;N Maher

  • Rates of fluid flow in fault systems; evidence for episodic rapid fluid flow in the Miocene Monterey Formation, coastal California

    Peter Eichhubl;James R. Boles

  • Structure, petrophysics, and diagenesis of shale entrained along a normal fault at Black Diamond Mines, California—Implications for fault seal

    Peter Eichhubl;Peter S. D'Onfro;Atilla Aydin;John Waters

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen E. Laubach
Stephen E. Laubach The University of Texas at Austin
Maša Prodanović
Maša Prodanović The University of Texas at Austin
Jon E. Olson
Jon E. Olson The University of Texas at Austin
Atilla Aydin
Atilla Aydin Stanford University
James R. Boles
James R. Boles University of California, Santa Barbara
Matthew T. Balhoff
Matthew T. Balhoff The University of Texas at Austin
Robert J. Bodnar
Robert J. Bodnar Virginia Tech
Steven L. Bryant
Steven L. Bryant University of Calgary
Grant Garven
Grant Garven Tufts University
Cliff Frohlich
Cliff Frohlich The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, but students often consider complementary fields to enhance their expertise. For those interested in language skills and cultural fluency, pursuing an online Spanish degree can be both affordable and lucrative. This skill set benefits Earth Science professionals working in international or community-based environmental projects.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science-related roles may find tailored resources and support through online Spanish degrees for veterans, which provide flexible learning options while valuing military experience. Such interdisciplinary education can amplify career opportunities in governmental or non-profit sectors.

On the creative side, an online MFA degree may appeal to those who wish to combine environmental science with visual storytelling, helping communicate important scientific findings through various media. This approach enhances public awareness and engagement.

Finally, for those interested in organizational roles within Earth Science institutions, an online human resource management masters programs provide essential leadership and management skills. This knowledge supports effective team coordination and project implementation in scientific environments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Eichhubl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles