World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
8163
World Ranking
5292
National Ranking
132

Marcus Schaub publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Schaub sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 183 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Marcus Schaub D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Schaub sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcus Schaub is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focusing on Environmental Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Earth and Planetary Sciences.

The scientist has contributed extensively to various subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Plant Science
  • Ecology

Schaub's work covers a range of topics within the environmental and biological sciences. The main areas of research include:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Forest Management and Policy

The scientist has published numerous papers across several prominent venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • New Phytologist (10 publications)
  • Tree Physiology (7 publications)
  • Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen (5 publications)
  • Nature Communications (3 publications)
  • Global Change Biology (3 publications)

Recent notable publications include:

  • "Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe" (2020) in Nature Communications
  • "Turgor - a limiting factor for radial growth in mature conifers along an elevational gradient" (2020) in New Phytologist
  • "Forest tree growth is linked to mycorrhizal fungal composition and function across Europe" (2022) in The ISME Journal
  • "Drought reduces water uptake in beech from the drying topsoil, but no compensatory uptake occurs from deeper soil layers" (2021) in New Phytologist
  • "Applying a science-based systems perspective to dispel misconceptions about climate effects of forest bioenergy" (2021) in GCB Bioenergy

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Schaub's research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Arthur Geßler
  • Andreas Rigling
  • Katrin Meusburger
  • Jonas Gisler
  • Roman Zweifel

In addition to journal articles, Schaub has contributed to book publications, including a title published by the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology: "Forest monitoring to assess forest functioning under air pollution and climate change. Proceedings. FORECOMON 2021 - the 9th forest ecosystem monitoring conference. 7-9 June 2021, Birmensdorf, Switzerland."

Best Publications

  • Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe

    Francesca Pilotto;Francesca Pilotto;Ingolf Kühn;Ingolf Kühn;Rita Adrian;Renate Alber

  • Environment and host as large-scale controls of ectomycorrhizal fungi

    Sietse van der Linde;Sietse van der Linde;Laura M. Suz;C. David L. Orme;Filipa Cox

  • The role of nutrients in drought-induced tree mortality and recovery

    Arthur Gessler;Marcus Schaub;Nate G. McDowell

  • Early stage litter decomposition across biomes

    Ika Djukic;Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas;Inger Kappel Schmidt;Klaus Steenberg Larsen

  • Recovery of trees from drought depends on belowground sink control

    Frank Hagedorn;Jobin Joseph;Jobin Joseph;Martina Peter;Jörg Luster

  • Forest tree growth is linked to mycorrhizal fungal composition and function across Europe

    Unknown

  • Promoting the O3 flux concept for European forest trees

    R. Matyssek;A. Bytnerowicz;P.-E. Karlsson;E. Paoletti

  • Impacts of acid deposition, ozone exposure and weather conditions on forest ecosystems in Europe: an overview

    W. de Vries;M. H. Dobbertin;S. Solberg;H. F. van Dobben

  • Drought tolerance of two black poplar (Populus nigra L.) clones: contribution of carbohydrates and oxidative stress defence

    Nicole Regier;Sebastian Streb;Claudia Cocozza;Marcus Schaub

  • Ozone air pollution and foliar injury development on native plants of Switzerland.

    Kristopher Novak;John M. Skelly;Marcus Schaub;Norbert Kräuchi

  • Risk assessments for forest trees: the performance of the ozone flux versus the AOT concepts.

    P.E. Karlsson;S. Braun;M. Broadmeadow;S. Elvira

  • Turgor - a limiting factor for radial growth in mature conifers along an elevational gradient.

    Richard L. Peters;Richard L. Peters;Richard L. Peters;Kathy Steppe;Henri E. Cuny;Henri E. Cuny;Dirk J.W. De Pauw

  • Advances of air pollution science: From forest decline to multiple-stress effects on forest ecosystem services

    E. Paoletti;M. Schaub;R. Matyssek;G. Wieser

  • Drought reduces water uptake in beech from the drying topsoil, but no compensatory uptake occurs from deeper soil layers.

    Arthur Gessler;Arthur Gessler;Lukas Bächli;Elham Rouholahnejad Freund;Kerstin Treydte

  • Nitrogen deposition is the most important environmental driver of growth of pure, even-aged and managed European forests

    Sophia Etzold;Marco Ferretti;Gert Jan Reinds;Svein Solberg

  • Ozone stress in woody plants assessed with chlorophyll a fluorescence. A critical reassessment of existing data

    Filippo Bussotti;Rosanna Desotgiu;Chiara Cascio;Martina Pollastrini

  • Drought induced tree mortality - a tree-ring isotope based conceptual model to assess mechanisms and predispositions.

    Arthur Gessler;Maxime Cailleret;Jobin Joseph;Leonie Schönbeck

  • Combining ensemble modeling and remote sensing for mapping individual tree species at high spatial resolution

    Robin Engler;Lars T. Waser;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Marcus Schaub

  • Photosynthetic behavior of woody species under high ozone exposure probed with the JIP-test : A review

    Filippo Bussotti;Reto J. Strasser;Marcus Schaub

  • Applying a science-based systems perspective to dispel misconceptions about climate effects of forest bioenergy

    Annette L. Cowie;Göran Berndes;Niclas Scott Bentsen;Miguel Brandão

  • Seasonal trends in reduced leaf gas exchange and ozone-induced foliar injury in three ozone sensitive woody plant species.

    K. Novak;M. Schaub;J. Fuhrer;J.M. Skelly

  • Ozone symptoms in leaves of woody plants in open‐top chambers: ultrastructural and physiological characteristics

    Elisabetta Gravano;Filippo Bussotti;Reto J. Strasser;Marcus Schaub

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Gessler
Arthur Gessler ETH Zurich
Mai-He Li
Mai-He Li Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
John L. Innes
John L. Innes University of British Columbia
Rolf T. W. Siegwolf
Rolf T. W. Siegwolf Paul Scherrer Institute
Martine Rebetez
Martine Rebetez Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Marco Ferretti
Marco Ferretti University of Camerino
Matthias Saurer
Matthias Saurer Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Frank Hagedorn
Frank Hagedorn Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Matthias Arend
Matthias Arend University of Trier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider complementary fields that broaden their impact, such as sociology and social work. For those interested in understanding human-environment interactions, pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree programs can provide valuable insight into societal behaviors and environmental policies.

Advanced education is increasingly accessible through flexible online formats. For professionals aiming to deepen their expertise without the traditional challenges of research-heavy programs, online doctoral programs without dissertation offer an appealing pathway for career advancement in related fields.

Educators and administrators focused on environmental education can enhance their credentials by enrolling in the best online eds to edd programs, which support leadership roles in curriculum development and policy implementation within environmental studies.

Additionally, professionals committed to social justice and community-focused environmental work might explore online dsw programs. These programs combine social work expertise with environmental advocacy, opening diverse career pathways that bridge science and society.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Schaub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles