World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
66
Citations
13677
World Ranking
1711
National Ranking
108

John L. Innes publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Innes sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 346 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John L. Innes D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Innes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

John L. Innes is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Plant Science, Ecology, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Major topics in their work encompass Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management; Forest Management and Policy; Bamboo Properties and Applications; Urban Green Space and Health; Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research; Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management; and Fire Effects on Ecosystems.

Recent publications authored or coauthored by John L. Innes include:

  • Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis, 2020, Journal of Forestry Research
  • Tree Vitality and Forest Health: Can Tree-Ring Stable Isotopes Be Used as Indicators?, 2021, Current Forestry Reports
  • Key challenges and approaches to addressing barriers in forest carbon offset projects, 2022, Journal of Forestry Research
  • Visitor satisfaction and behavioral intentions in nature-based tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study from Zhangjiajie National Forest Park, China, 2022, International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks
  • Challenges Facing the Improvement of Forest Management in the Hyrcanian Forests of Iran, 2022, Forests

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Innes include Guangyu Wang, Anil Shrestha, Dehui Christina Geng, Chunyu Pan, and Patrick O. Waeber. These collaborations have contributed to various publications across multiple research topics.

The scientist has published in several recurring venues, most notably:

  • Sustainability
  • Journal of Forestry Research
  • International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks
  • Forests
  • Advances in Bamboo Science

Best Publications

  • Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis.

    Dehui Christina Geng;John Innes;Wanli Wu;Guangyu Wang

  • Identification, measurement and interpretation of tree rings in woody species from mediterranean climates

    Paolo Cherubini;Barbara L. Gartner;Roberto Tognetti;Otto U. Bräker

  • Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics

    D J Wilford;M E Sakals;J L Innes;Roy C Sidle

  • Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests

    T.B. Larsson;P. Angelstam;G. Balent;A. Barbati

  • China's Forestry Reforms

    Guangyu Wang;John L. Innes;Jiafu Lei;Shuanyou Dai

  • Forest Health: Its Assessment and Status

    John L. Innes

  • Integrated watershed management: evolution, development and emerging trends

    Guangyu Wang;Shari Mang;Haisheng Cai;Shirong Liu

  • Tree-life history prior to death: two fungal root pathogens affect tree-ring growth differently

    Paolo Cherubini;Giovanni Fontana;Daniel Rigling;Matthias Dobbertin

  • Lichenometric dating of debris‐flow deposits in the Scottish Highlands

    John L. Innes

  • Ozone — A Risk Factor for Trees and Forests in Europe?

    R. Matyssek;J. L. Innes

  • Spatial and temporal variations in the end date of the vegetation growing season throughout the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2011

    Mingliang Che;Baozhang Chen;Baozhang Chen;John L. Innes;Guangyu Wang

  • Changes in vegetation photosynthetic activity trends across the Asia-Pacific region over the last three decades

    Baozhang Chen;Baozhang Chen;Guang Xu;Nicholas C. Coops;Philippe Ciais

  • Impacts of climate change on mountain regions

    Martin Beniston;Douglas G. Fox;S. Adhikary;R. Andressen

  • Forest biodiversity and its assessment by remote sensing

    John L. Innes;Barbara Koch

  • Changes in Vegetation Growth Dynamics and Relations with Climate over China’s Landmass from 1982 to 2011

    Guang Xu;Huifang Zhang;Baozhang Chen;Hairong Zhang

  • Estimation of forest biomass dynamics in subtropical forests using multi-temporal airborne LiDAR data

    Lin Cao;Lin Cao;Nicholas C. Coops;John L. Innes;Stephen R.J. Sheppard

  • Comparative stem‐growth rates of Mediterranean trees under background and naturally enhanced ambient CO2 concentrations

    Roberto Tognetti;Paolo Cherubini;John L. Innes

  • National Park Development in China: Conservation or Commercialization?

    Guangyu Wang;John L. Innes;Sara W. Wu;Judi Krzyzanowski

  • ClimateAP: an application for dynamic local downscaling of historical and future climate data in Asia Pacific

    Tongli Wang;Guangyu Wang;John L. Innes;Brad Seely

  • Ozone exposure thresholds and foliar injury on forest plants in Switzerland.

    D. VanderHeyden;J. Skelly;J. Innes;C. Hug

  • Air pollution and forest decline in Central Europe.

    Otto Kandler;John L. Innes

  • High-altitude and high-latitude tree growth in relation to past, present and future global climate change

    J.L. Innes

  • Lichenometry

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus Schaub
Marcus Schaub Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Martine Rebetez
Martine Rebetez Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Arthur Gessler
Arthur Gessler ETH Zurich
Baozhang Chen
Baozhang Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Martin Beniston
Martin Beniston University of Geneva
Nicholas C. Coops
Nicholas C. Coops University of British Columbia
Matthias Dobbertin
Matthias Dobbertin Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Paolo Cherubini
Paolo Cherubini Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Suzanne W. Simard
Suzanne W. Simard University of British Columbia
Rainer Matyssek
Rainer Matyssek Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary careers and educational opportunities. Many students with a science background consider expanding their impact by entering counseling or psychology. If you're interested in supporting people’s well-being, affordable masters in counseling programs can help you develop essential skills in mental health services.

Similarly, understanding behavior on both an ecological and individual level can lead you to the field of psychology. Accredited online clinical psychology programs offer flexible study options for those eager to explore behavioral science or clinical practice.

Those seeking to make a positive impact in communities can explore fast-tracked paths such as a human services bachelors degree online. This can lead to roles in social work, advocacy, or nonprofit management—all invaluable to building healthier, more sustainable societies.

Education professionals looking for a shift may also consider speech and language careers. It’s easy to get started on a new pathway by learning what is an slp in education to see if this specialized field matches your interests.

Best Scientists Citing John L. Innes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles