World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
15712
World Ranking
1795
National Ranking
50

Paolo Cherubini publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Cherubini sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 279 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Paolo Cherubini D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Cherubini sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paolo Cherubini is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions also in specialized subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, and Pollution.

Their research topics focus extensively on Tree-ring climate responses, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Forest ecology and management, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Horticultural and Viticultural Research, and Tree Root and Stability Studies.

The scientist has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, including recent papers such as:

  • Tree Vitality and Forest Health: Can Tree-Ring Stable Isotopes Be Used as Indicators? (2021, Current Forestry Reports)
  • Recent European drought extremes beyond Common Era background variability (2021, Nature Geoscience)
  • The influence of decision-making in tree ring-based climate reconstructions (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Precise date for the Laacher See eruption synchronizes the Younger Dryas (2021, Nature)
  • Joint effects of climate, tree size, and year on annual tree growth derived from tree-ring records of ten globally distributed forests (2021, Global Change Biology)

Their frequent co-authors include Matthias Saurer, Liangjun Zhu, Mai-He Li, Ulf Büntgen, and Xiaochun Wang. Across their career, they have published work multiple times in prominent journals such as Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Indicators, Dendrochronologia, and Tree Physiology.

The scientist's work integrates diverse approaches within tree-ring analysis and related environmental studies, often focusing on forest health, climate variability, and plant physiological responses at various temporal and spatial scales. Their research draws upon long-term ecological data to address questions in forest ecology, hydrology, and paleoclimatology.

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • On the 'Divergence Problem' in Northern Forests: A review of the tree-ring evidence and possible causes

    Rosanne D'Arrigo;Rob Wilson;Rob Wilson;Beate Liepert;Paolo Cherubini;Paolo Cherubini

  • A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality

    Maxime Cailleret;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Lucía Desoto

  • Identification, measurement and interpretation of tree rings in woody species from mediterranean climates

    Paolo Cherubini;Barbara L. Gartner;Roberto Tognetti;Otto U. Bräker

  • Recent European drought extremes beyond Common Era background variability

    Ulf Büntgen;Otmar Urban;Paul J. Krusic;Paul J. Krusic;Michal Rybníček;Michal Rybníček

  • Thresholds for warming-induced growth decline at elevational tree line in the Yukon Territory, Canada

    Rosanne D. D'Arrigo;Robert K. Kaufmann;Nicole Davi;Gordon C. Jacoby

  • Growth response to climate and drought in Pinus nigra Arn. trees of different crown classes

    Darío Martín-Benito;Paolo Cherubini;Miren del Río;Isabel Cañellas

  • Elevated CO2 increases tree‐level intrinsic water use efficiency: insights from carbon and oxygen isotope analyses in tree rings across three forest FACE sites

    Giovanna Battipaglia;Giovanna Battipaglia;Matthias Saurer;Paolo Cherubini;Carlo Calfapietra

  • Tree-life history prior to death: two fungal root pathogens affect tree-ring growth differently

    Paolo Cherubini;Giovanni Fontana;Daniel Rigling;Matthias Dobbertin

  • Drought tolerance of two black poplar (Populus nigra L.) clones: contribution of carbohydrates and oxidative stress defence

    Nicole Regier;Sebastian Streb;Claudia Cocozza;Marcus Schaub

  • Mobile carbohydrates in Himalayan treeline trees I. Evidence for carbon gain limitation but not for growth limitation.

    Mai-He Li;Mai-He Li;Wen-Fa Xiao;San-Gen Wang;Gen-Wei Cheng

  • Intra-annual density fluctuations in tree rings: how, when, where, and why?

    V. De Micco;F. Campelo;M. De Luis;A. Bräuning

  • Tree rings reveal globally coherent signature of cosmogenic radiocarbon events in 774 and 993 CE.

    Ulf Büntgen;Lukas Wacker;J. Diego Galván;Stephanie Arnold

  • Comparative stem‐growth rates of Mediterranean trees under background and naturally enhanced ambient CO2 concentrations

    Roberto Tognetti;Paolo Cherubini;John L. Innes

  • Early-warning signals of individual tree mortality based on annual radial growth

    Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Vasilis Dakos;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M.R. Robert;Elisabeth M.R. Robert

  • Variations of vessel diameter and δ13C in false rings of Arbutus unedo L. reflect different environmental conditions

    Giovanna Battipaglia;Giovanna Battipaglia;Veronica De Micco;Willi A. Brand;Petra Linke

  • The influence of decision-making in tree ring-based climate reconstructions

    Ulf Büntgen;Kathy Allen;Kathy Allen;Kevin J. Anchukaitis;Dominique Arseneault

  • Modelling carbon budget of Mediterranean forests using ground and remote sensing measurements

    M. Chiesi;F. Maselli;M. Bindi;L. Fibbi

  • Drought impact on water use efficiency and intra-annual density fluctuations in Erica arborea on Elba (Italy)

    Giovanna Battipaglia;Giovanna Battipaglia;Veronica De Micco;Willi A. Brand;Matthias Saurer

  • An investigation of the common signal in tree ring stable isotope chronologies at temperate sites

    M. Saurer;P. Cherubini;C. E. Reynolds-Henne;C. E. Reynolds-Henne;K. S. Treydte

  • Tree-ring reconstructions of precipitation and streamflow for north-western Turkey

    Ünal Akkemik;Rosanne D'Arrigo;Paolo Cherubini;Paolo Cherubini;Nesibe Köse

  • Fast response of Scots pine to improved water availability reflected in tree-ring width and δ13C

    Britta Eilmann;Nina Buchmann;Rolf Siegwolf;Matthias Saurer

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanna Battipaglia
Giovanna Battipaglia University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Matthias Saurer
Matthias Saurer Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Roberto Tognetti
Roberto Tognetti University of Molise
Ulf Büntgen
Ulf Büntgen University of Cambridge
Markus Egli
Markus Egli University of Zurich
Rolf T. W. Siegwolf
Rolf T. W. Siegwolf Paul Scherrer Institute
Veronica De Micco
Veronica De Micco University of Naples Federico II
Marco Marchetti
Marco Marchetti University of Molise
Kerstin Treydte
Kerstin Treydte Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Alexander V. Kirdyanov
Alexander V. Kirdyanov University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to diverse career directions, many of which are accessible through flexible online learning. For those looking to cross over from unrelated fields, there are various accelerated and bridge programs. For example, healthcare-related studies are increasingly popular, including the asha approved slp programs online that enable you to become a certified speech-language pathologist through streamlined coursework.

If you’re transitioning into speech-language pathology with a non-SLP background, an slp bridge program can help you meet prerequisites and advance your career. Similarly, those interested in nursing can take advantage of some of the best online bsn programs for non nurses, offering a fast track for career changers.

Understanding potential career pathways also means staying informed about salary expectations. If your interests lean toward mental health, you might want to know how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make in your state. Researching these options helps you align your education with your personal and professional goals—even if your background isn’t strictly in ecology or biology.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Cherubini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles