World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
11208
World Ranking
4167
National Ranking
95

Matthias Dobbertin publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Dobbertin sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 103 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Matthias Dobbertin D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Dobbertin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Dobbertin is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their work is grounded in scientific research related to forest ecosystems and landscape analysis.

While specific details about research papers, coauthors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, and main topics are not provided, the institutional affiliation highlights a focus on environmental and forest research. As part of a federal research institute, their work likely addresses ecological dynamics, forest health, climate interactions, and landscape management practices within Switzerland and possibly broader European contexts.

There are no listed publications, frequent co-authors, or awards available at this time.

Best Publications

  • Drought as an Inciting Mortality Factor in Scots Pine Stands of the Valais, Switzerland

    Christof Bigler;Christof Bigler;Otto Ulrich Bräker;Harald Bugmann;Matthias Dobbertin;Matthias Dobbertin

  • Tree growth as indicator of tree vitality and of tree reaction to environmental stress: a review

    Matthias Dobbertin

  • A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees.

    Greg S. Biging;Matthias Dobbertin

  • Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models

    Gregory S. Biging;Matthias Dobbertin

  • Tree growth as indicator of tree vitality and of tree reaction to environmental stress: a review

    Unknown

  • LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management

    Felix Morsdorf;Erich Meier;Benjamin Kötz;Klaus I. Itten

  • The impact of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by European forests and heathlands

    W. de Vries;S. Solberg;M. Dobbertin;H. Sterba

  • Driving factors of a vegetation shift from Scots pine to pubescent oak in dry Alpine forests

    Andreas Rigling;Christof Bigler;Britta Eilmann;Elisabeth Feldmeyer-Christe

  • Climate change may already threaten Scots pine stands in the Swiss Alps

    M. Rebetez;M. Dobbertin

  • The influence of sampling design on tree-ring-based quantification of forest growth

    Christoph Nehrbass-Ahles;Flurin Babst;Stefan Klesse;Magdalena Nötzli

  • Divergent vegetation growth responses to the 2003 heat wave in the Swiss Alps

    William M. Jolly;Matthias Dobbertin;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Markus Reichstein

  • Spatio-temporal effects of forest canopy on understory microclimate in a long-term experiment in Switzerland

    Georg von Arx;Matthias Dobbertin;Martine Rebetez

  • Analyses of the impact of changes in atmospheric deposition and climate on forest growth in European monitoring plots: A stand growth approach

    Svein Solberg;Matthias Dobbertin;Gert Jan Reinds;Holger Lange

  • Provenance-specific growth responses to drought and air warming in three European oak species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens)

    Matthias Arend;Thomas Kuster;Madeleine S. Günthardt-Goerg;Matthias Dobbertin

  • Tree-life history prior to death: two fungal root pathogens affect tree-ring growth differently

    Paolo Cherubini;Giovanni Fontana;Daniel Rigling;Matthias Dobbertin

  • Impacts of acid deposition, ozone exposure and weather conditions on forest ecosystems in Europe: an overview

    W. de Vries;M. H. Dobbertin;S. Solberg;H. F. van Dobben

  • Ecologically implausible carbon response

    Wim de Vries;Svein Solberg;Matthias Dobbertin;Hubert Sterba

  • Increasing storm damage to forests in Switzerland from 1858 to 2007

    Tilo Usbeck;Thomas Wohlgemuth;Matthias Dobbertin;Christian Pfister

  • Crown defoliation improves tree mortality models

    Matthias Dobbertin;Peter Brang

  • Pine mistletoe (Viscum album ssp. austriacum) contributes to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) mortality in the Rhone valley of Switzerland

    M. Dobbertin;A. Rigling

  • Assessing the role of bark- and wood-boring insects in the decline of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris ) in the Swiss Rhone valley

    B. Wermelinger;A. Rigling;D. Schneider Mathis;M. Dobbertin

  • Effect of irrigation on needle morphology, shoot and stem growth in a drought-exposed Pinus sylvestris forest.

    Matthias Dobbertin;Britta Eilmann;Peter Bleuler;Arnaud Giuggiola

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Wohlgemuth
Thomas Wohlgemuth Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Martine Rebetez
Martine Rebetez Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Hubert Sterba
Hubert Sterba BOKU University
Svein Solberg
Svein Solberg Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
Roman Zweifel
Roman Zweifel Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Niklaus E. Zimmermann
Niklaus E. Zimmermann Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Marcus Schaub
Marcus Schaub Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Mai-He Li
Mai-He Li Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Daniel Rigling
Daniel Rigling Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring ecology and evolution opens doors to interdisciplinary study and unique careers, often blending natural sciences with healthcare and environmental management. Many students seek flexible education options, such as online programs, to balance studies with other commitments.

For those already in the healthcare field, advancing your credentials quickly can be key. The shortest rn to bsn program options allow you to upskill in as little as six months, providing vital knowledge in bioethics, genetics, and research methods that complement applied ecology and evolution.

If you're an associate degree nurse aspiring to advanced practice roles, asn to np programs present bridge options—some fully online—so you can specialize in areas like public health or environmental nursing while still working.

Career changers from non-nursing backgrounds can access msn direct entry programs online. These programs offer an accelerated route into nursing with a graduate degree, fostering analytical skills relevant to ecological health and policy work.

Program choice matters: comparing capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn helps you find the best fit, tuition value, and specialization. Leveraging online pathways can launch or advance your ecology and evolution career while keeping you adaptable in a rapidly changing job market.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Dobbertin

Recently Published Articles