World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
4726
World Ranking
9163
National Ranking
178

Marine Elbakidze publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marine Elbakidze sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 98 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Marine Elbakidze D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marine Elbakidze sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marine Elbakidze is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with an emphasis on specific subfields such as global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, plant science, strategy and management, and environmental engineering.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Land use and ecosystem services
  • Urban green space and health
  • Conservation, biodiversity, and resource management
  • Urban agriculture and sustainability
  • Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Urban heat island mitigation
  • Forest management and policy

Marine Elbakidze has contributed to multiple publication venues. The most frequent of these are:

  • Urban forestry & urban greening
  • Ecology and Society
  • Landscape and Urban Planning
  • People and Nature
  • Agroforestry Systems

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Marine Elbakidze are:

  • Multiple factors shape the interaction of people with urban greenspace: Sweden as a case study (2022), Urban forestry & urban greening
  • Perceived benefits from agroforestry landscapes across North-Eastern Europe: What matters and for whom? (2021), Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Why don't we go outside? - Perceived constraints for users of urban greenspace in Sweden (2023), Urban forestry & urban greening
  • Biodiversity conservation through forest certification: key factors shaping national Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standard-development processes in Canada, Sweden, and Russia (2022), Ecology and Society
  • Bogs, birds, and berries in Belarus: the governance and management dynamics of wetland restoration in a state-centric, top-down context (2021), Ecology and Society

The list of frequent co-authors includes:

  • Lucas Dawson
  • Sara Teitelbaum
  • C.L. Schaffer
  • Constance L. McDermott
  • Maria Tysiachniouk

Marine Elbakidze's research addresses diverse aspects of environmental science, ranging from urban green space use and its health impacts to governance dynamics in wetland restoration and forest certification processes. Their work intersects topics like ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, urban sustainability, and environmental policy development across multiple geographic contexts, including Sweden and broader Northern and Eastern Europe.

Best Publications

  • Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine

    Matthias Baumann;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle;Marine Elbakidze;Marine Elbakidze;Mutlu Ozdogan

  • From economic survival to recreation: contemporary uses of wild food and medicine in rural Sweden, Ukraine and NW Russia

    Nataliya Stryamets;Marine Elbakidze;Melissa Ceuterick;Per Angelstam

  • Social and Cultural Sustainability: Criteria, Indicators, Verifier Variables for Measurement and Maps for Visualization to Support Planning

    Robert Axelsson;Per Angelstam;Erik Degerman;Sara Teitelbaum

  • Solving Problems in Social–Ecological Systems: Definition, Practice and Barriers of Transdisciplinary Research

    Per Angelstam;Kjell Andersson;Matilda Annerstedt;Robert Axelsson

  • Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish model forest initiatives: adaptive governance toward sustainable forest management?

    Marine Elbakidze;Per K. Angelstam;Camilla Sandström;Robert Axelsson

  • Measurement, Collaborative Learning and Research for Sustainable Use of Ecosystem Services: Landscape Concepts and Europe as Laboratory

    Per Angelstam;Michael Grodzynskyi;Kjell Andersson;Robert Axelsson

  • Sustainable Development and Sustainability: Landscape Approach as a Practical Interpretation of Principles and Implementation Concepts

    Robert Axelsson;Per Angelstam;Marine Elbakidze;Nataliya Stryamets

  • Implementing sustainable forest management in Ukraine's Carpathian Mountains: The role of traditional village systems

    Marine Elbakidze;Marine Elbakidze;Per Angelstam

  • Stakeholder perspectives of wood-pasture ecosystem services: A case study from Iberian dehesas

    Pablo Garrido;Marine Elbakidze;Per Angelstam;Tobias Plieninger

  • Protecting Forest Areas for Biodiversity in Sweden 1991-2010 : the Policy Implementation Process and Outcomes on the Ground

    Per Angelstam;Kjell Andersson;Robert Axelsson;Marine Elbakidze

  • How does forest certification contribute to boreal biodiversity conservation? Standards and outcomes in Sweden and NW Russia

    Marine Elbakidze;Per Angelstam;Kjell Andersson;Mats Nordberg

  • Is spatial planning a collaborative learning process? A case study from a rural–urban gradient in Sweden

    Marine Elbakidze;Lucas Dawson;Kjell Andersson;Robert Axelsson

  • Stakeholders’ perceptions on ecosystem services in Östergötland’s (Sweden) threatened oak wood-pasture landscapes

    Pablo Garrido;Marine Elbakidze;Per Angelstam

  • Knowledge production and learning for sustainable forest management on the ground: Pan-European landscapes as a time machine

    Per Angelstam;Robert Axelsson;Marine Elbakidze;Lars Laestadius

  • Governance and management dynamics of landscape restoration at multiple scales: Learning from successful environmental managers in Sweden

    Lucas Dawson;Marine Elbakidze;Per Angelstam;Johanna Gordon

  • Global Change Research in the Carpathian Mountain Region

    Anita Bokwa;Wojciech Cheømicki;Marine Elbakidze;Manuela Hirschmugl

  • How to reconcile wood production and biodiversity conservation? The Pan-European boreal forest history gradient as an "experiment".

    Vladimir Naumov;Michael Manton;Marine Elbakidze;Zigmars Rendenieks

  • Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural–urban gradient

    Kjell Andersson;Per Angelstam;Marine Elbakidze;Robert Axelsson

  • A bottom-up approach to map land covers as potential green infrastructure hubs for human well-being in rural settings: A case study from Sweden

    Marine Elbakidze;Per Angelstam;Taras Yamelynets;Lucas Dawson

  • Knowledge production and learning for sustainable landscapes: seven steps using social-ecological systems as laboratories.

    Per Angelstam;Marine Elbakidze;Robert Axelsson;Malcolm Dixelius

  • The regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia : summary for policymakers

    Markus Fischer;Mark Rounsevell;Amor Torre-Marin Rando;André Mader

  • Protecting forest areas for biodiversity in Sweden 1991-2010

    Per Angelstam;Kjell Andersson;Robert Axelsson;Marine Elbakidze

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Angelstam
Per Angelstam Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Mikolaj Czajkowski
Mikolaj Czajkowski University of Warsaw
Tobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
Bengt Gunnar Jonsson Mid Sweden University
Patrick Hostert
Patrick Hostert Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Tobias Plieninger
Tobias Plieninger University of Göttingen
Pedro Beja
Pedro Beja University of Porto
Mutlu Ozdogan
Mutlu Ozdogan University of Wisconsin–Madison
Per Milberg
Per Milberg Linköping University
Gerardo Moreno
Gerardo Moreno University of Extremadura

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open new career pathways. Many professionals seek to enhance their expertise without the traditional barriers, which is where programs like a doctorate degree online no dissertation become attractive options. These flexible programs allow learners to focus on applied learning without the stress of extensive dissertation requirements.

Educators and researchers may also consider specialized tracks such as an eds to edd bridge program, which facilitates a smooth transition from a master's level Education Specialist degree to a Doctorate in Education. This pathway is ideal for those aiming to deepen their impact in environmental education or policy-making.

For individuals interested in social work’s intersection with environmental issues, exploring the cheapest online dsw programs offers an affordable route to doctoral credentials while engaging with community-based environmental challenges.

Lastly, students seeking broad interdisciplinary knowledge to support various environmental careers might find value in an affordable online general studies degree. This degree provides flexibility and foundational skills applicable across scientific, policy, and advocacy roles.

Best Scientists Citing Marine Elbakidze

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles