World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Šárka Pospíšilová

Šárka Pospíšilová

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 56 14364 13207 18 17 609 12108

Šárka Pospíšilová publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Šárka Pospíšilová between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Šárka Pospíšilová published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 21.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2018. 29 of the 724 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2018. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 35 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 52 publications 2016: 50 publications 2017: 59 publications 2018: 66 publications 2019: 55 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 63 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 11 publications
1993 2025

724 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Šárka Pospíšilová: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 3
2001 7
2002 1
2003 3
2004 14
2005 12
2006 13
2007 8
2008 12
2009 26
2010 25
2011 35
2012 35
2013 27
2014 40
2015 52
2016 50
2017 59
2018 66
2019 55
2020 37
2021 27
2022 22
2023 63
2024 18
2025 11
Total 724
Download as CSV

Šárka Pospíšilová publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Šárka Pospíšilová sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 607–616 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 609 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33 609
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Šárka Pospíšilová D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Šárka Pospíšilová sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235 56
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Šárka Pospíšilová is affiliated with Masaryk University in the Czech Republic. Their research focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist has an extensive record in genetics, pathology and forensic medicine, molecular biology, immunology, and oncology.

The primary topics covered in their research include chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, cancer genomics and diagnostics, CAR-T cell therapy research, advanced breast cancer therapies, and chronic myeloid leukemia treatments.

Šárka Pospíšilová has published prominently in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues are Blood with 16 papers, Leukemia with 11 papers, HemaSphere with 10 papers, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 5 papers, and Haematologica with 4 papers.

Recent publications by Šárka Pospíšilová include:

  • International prognostic score for asymptomatic early-stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 2020, Blood
  • Higher-order connections between stereotyped subsets: implications for improved patient classification in CLL, 2020, Blood
  • Genomic arrays identify high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia with genomic complexity: a multi-center study, 2020, Haematologica
  • Whole Exome Sequencing reveals NOTCH1 mutations in anaplastic large cell lymphoma and points to Notch both as a key pathway and a potential therapeutic target, 2020, Haematologica
  • miR-29 modulates CD40 signaling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by targeting TRAF4: an axis affected by BCR inhibitors, 2021, Blood

Frequent co-authors of Šárka Pospíšilová include:

  • Michael Doubek
  • Karla Plevová
  • Paolo Ghia
  • Richard Rosenquist
  • Šárka Pavlová

Best Publications

  • Stereotyped B-cell receptors in one-third of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a molecular classification with implications for targeted therapies

    Andreas Agathangelidis;Nikos Darzentas;Anastasia Hadzidimitriou;Xavier Brochet

  • Towards error-free profiling of immune repertoires

    Mikhail Shugay;Olga V Britanova;Ekaterina M Merzlyak;Maria A Turchaninova

  • Recurrent mutations refine prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    P Baliakas;A Hadzidimitriou;L-A Sutton;D Rossi

  • ERIC recommendations on TP53 mutation analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    S Pospisilova;D Gonzalez;J Malcikova;M Trbusek

  • MicroRNA isolation and stability in stored RNA samples.

    Marek Mráz;Karla Malinová;Jiří Mayer;Šárka Pospíšilová

  • A Complex Role for FGF‐2 in Self‐Renewal, Survival, and Adhesion of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    Livia Eiselleova;Kamil Matulka;Vitezslav Kriz;Michaela Kunova

  • miR-34a, miR-29c and miR-17-5p are downregulated in CLL patients with TP53 abnormalities

    Marek Mraz;K Malinova;J Kotaskova;Sarka Pavlova

  • Cytogenetic complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: definitions, associations, and clinical impact

    Panagiotis Baliakas;Sabine Jeromin;Michalis Iskas;Anna Puiggros

  • Monoallelic and biallelic inactivation of TP53 gene in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: selection, impact on survival, and response to DNA damage.

    Jitka Malcikova;Jana Smardova;Ludmila Rocnova;Boris Tichy

  • A complementary role of multiparameter flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing for minimal residual disease detection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an European Research Initiative on CLL study

    A. C. Rawstron;C. Fazi;A. Agathangelidis;N. Villamor

  • TP53 mutation profile in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: evidence for a disease specific profile from a comprehensive analysis of 268 mutations

    T. Zenz;D. Vollmer;Martin Trbušek;Jana Šmardová

  • MicroRNA biogenesis, functionality and cancer relevance.

    Branislav Kusenda;Marek Mraz;Jiri Mayer;Sarka Pospisilova

  • ERIC recommendations for TP53 mutation analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia-update on methodological approaches and results interpretation

    J. Malcikova;J. Malcikova;E. Tausch;D. Rossi;Lesley Ann Sutton;Lesley Ann Sutton

  • High-quality full-length immunoglobulin profiling with unique molecular barcoding.

    M. A. Turchaninova;M. A. Turchaninova;M. A. Turchaninova;Alexey Nikolayevich Davydov;O. V. Britanova;O. V. Britanova;Mikhail Shugay;Mikhail Shugay

  • MYB transcriptionally regulates the miR-155 host gene in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    Karin Vargova;Nikola Curik;Pavel Burda;Petra Basova

  • Detailed analysis of therapy-driven clonal evolution of TP53 mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    J Malcikova;K Stano-Kozubik;B Tichy;B Kantorova

  • Reproducible diagnosis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia by flow cytometry: an European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) & European Society for Clinical Cell Analysis (ESCCA) harmonisation project

    Andy C Rawstron;Karl-Anton Kreuzer;Asha Soosapilla;Martin Spacek

  • Whole-exome sequencing in relapsing chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical impact of recurrent RPS15 mutations.

    Viktor Ljungström;Diego Cortese;Emma Young;Tatjana Pandzic

  • Chromosomal translocations and karyotype complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic reappraisal of classic cytogenetic data.

    Panagiotis Baliakas;Michalis Iskas;Anne Gardiner;Zadie Davis

  • MicroRNAs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia pathogenesis and disease subtypes.

    Marek Mraz;Sarka Pospisilova;Karla Malinova;Ivo Slapak

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Rosenquist
Richard Rosenquist Karolinska Institute
Paolo Ghia
Paolo Ghia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Kostas Stamatopoulos
Kostas Stamatopoulos Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
David Oscier
David Oscier Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Frederic Davi
Frederic Davi Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Davide Rossi
Davide Rossi European Society for Medical Oncology
Gianluca Gaidano
Gianluca Gaidano University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Gunnar Juliusson
Gunnar Juliusson Lund University
Anton W. Langerak
Anton W. Langerak Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nicholas Chiorazzi
Nicholas Chiorazzi Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of healthcare and science careers. Many students look to online programs for flexibility and affordability. For example, those interested in diagnostic healthcare careers might consider online associate radiology tech programs, which blend science fundamentals with hands-on clinical skills.

Nutrition and wellness are also popular fields. Pursuing one of the top dietetics programs in the us can lead to roles in hospitals, research, or food industry settings. Financial concerns continue to be an issue for many prospective students, but options like financial aid for medical assistant programs can help make education more accessible.

For those already working as medical assistants, there are clear advancement paths. A popular choice is enrolling in a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online, allowing professionals to boost their credentials and career opportunities. Each of these related programs complements a foundation in Biology and Biochemistry, supporting diverse roles in America’s healthcare and science landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Šárka Pospíšilová

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles