World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
19675
World Ranking
5599
National Ranking
158

Frederic Davi publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic Davi sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 326 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Frederic Davi D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic Davi sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederic Davi is affiliated with Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris in France. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with substantial contributions to Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Immunology. They have also worked in Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Frederic Davi has published extensively in several key venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Leukemia
  • Blood
  • HemaSphere
  • Haematologica
  • American Journal of Hematology

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Frederic Davi are:

  • Higher-order connections between stereotyped subsets: implications for improved patient classification in CLL, 2020, Blood
  • Molecular and clinical diversity in primary central nervous system lymphoma, 2022, Annals of Oncology
  • Immunoglobulin gene sequence analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the 2022 update of the recommendations by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, 2022, Leukemia
  • Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia patients: Correlations and prognostic impact, 2021, American Journal of Hematology
  • Primary vitreoretinal lymphomas display a remarkably restricted immunoglobulin gene repertoire, 2020, Blood Advances

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Κώστας Σταματόπουλος
  • Clotilde Bravetti
  • Anton W. Langerak
  • Paolo Ghia
  • Sylvain Choquet

Best Publications

  • Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936.

    J J M van Dongen;A W Langerak;M Brüggemann;P A S Evans

  • Over 20% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carry stereotyped receptors: pathogenetic implications and clinical correlations

    Kostas Stamatopoulos;Chrysoula Belessi;Carol Moreno;Myriam Boudjograh

  • EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 guidelines for interpretation and reporting of Ig/TCR clonality testing in suspected lymphoproliferations

    A. W. Langerak;P. J. T. A. Groenen;M. Brüggemann;K. Beldjord

  • Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders not associated with Epstein-Barr virus: a distinct entity?

    V Leblond;F Davi;F Charlotte;R Dorent

  • Stereotyped B-cell receptors in one-third of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a molecular classification with implications for targeted therapies

    Andreas Agathangelidis;Nikos Darzentas;Anastasia Hadzidimitriou;Xavier Brochet

  • Stereotyped patterns of somatic hypermutation in subsets of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: implications for the role of antigen selection in leukemogenesis

    Fiona Murray;Nikos Darzentas;Anastasia Hadzidimitriou;Gerard Tobin

  • Lymphoproliferative disorders after organ transplantation: a report of 24 cases observed in a single center.

    V Leblond;L Sutton;R Dorent;F Davi

  • Significantly improved PCR-based clonality testing in B-cell malignancies by use of multiple immunoglobulin gene targets: Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936

    P. A. S. Evans;Ch Pott;P. J. T. A. Groenen;G. Salles

  • Improved reliability of lymphoma diagnostics via PCR-based clonality testing: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936.

    J H J M van Krieken;A W Langerak;E A Macintyre;M Kneba

  • ERIC recommendations on IGHV gene mutational status analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Paolo Ghia;K. Stamatopoulos;C. Belessi;C. Moreno

  • Geographic patterns and pathogenetic implications of IGHV gene usage in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the lesson of the IGHV3-21 gene

    Paolo Ghia;Kostas Stamatopoulos;Chrysoula Belessi;Carol Moreno

  • Acquired initiating mutations in early hematopoietic cells of CLL patients

    Frederik Damm;Frederik Damm;Elena Mylonas;Elena Mylonas;Adrien Cosson;Adrien Cosson;Kenichi Yoshida

  • Powerful strategy for polymerase chain reaction-based clonality assessment in T-cell malignancies Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4 CT98-3936.

    M. Brüggemann;H. White;P. Gaulard;R. Garcia-Sanz

  • Description of a novel FR1 IgH PCR strategy and its comparison with three other strategies for the detection of clonality in B cell malignancies.

    J Aubin;F Davi;F Nguyen-Salomon;D Leboeuf

  • Identification of Prognostic Factors in 61 Patients With Posttransplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorders

    Véronique Leblond;Nathalie Dhedin;Marie-France Mamzer Bruneel;Sylvain Choquet

  • Standardized next-generation sequencing of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations for MRD marker identification in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; a EuroClonality-NGS validation study

    Monika Brüggemann;Michaela Kotrová;Henrik Knecht;Jack Bartram

  • Cytogenetic complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: definitions, associations, and clinical impact

    Panagiotis Baliakas;Sabine Jeromin;Michalis Iskas;Anna Puiggros

  • The LPL/ADAM29 expression ratio is a novel prognosis indicator in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Pablo Oppezzo;Yuri Vasconcelos;Catherine Settegrana;Dominique Jeannel

  • Modulated expression of notch1 during thymocyte development

    RP Hasserjian;JC Aster;F Davi;DS Weinberg

  • Identification o f P rognostic F actors i n 6 1 P atients W ith Posttransplantat ion L ymphoproliferat ive D isorders

    Véronique Leblond;Nathalie Dhedin;Marie-France Mamzer Bruneel;Sylvain Choquet

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Rosenquist
Richard Rosenquist Karolinska Institute
Paolo Ghia
Paolo Ghia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Kostas Stamatopoulos
Kostas Stamatopoulos Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
Šárka Pospíšilová
Šárka Pospíšilová Masaryk University
Véronique Leblond
Véronique Leblond Sorbonne University
David Oscier
David Oscier Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Anton W. Langerak
Anton W. Langerak Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nicholas Chiorazzi
Nicholas Chiorazzi Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Olivier Hermine
Olivier Hermine Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital
Gunnar Juliusson
Gunnar Juliusson Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in Biology or Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of rewarding and flexible career paths, especially with the growing popularity of online learning. For those interested in the intersection of health, movement, and physiology, kinesiology online programs provide an excellent foundation for roles in sports medicine, rehabilitation, or human performance.

If you’re aiming to advance your nursing career, there are options for accelerated certifications. Programs like the shortest pmhnp certificate program and shortest online nurse practitioner program allow qualified nurses to specialize quickly in psychiatric mental health or family practice roles, filling vital gaps in healthcare.

Nutrition is another in-demand field closely tied to biology and biochemistry studies. A nutritionist degree online lets students gain vital knowledge in food science and health, with the affordability and flexibility that online programs offer.

No matter which path you choose, these diverse online degree options make it possible to build a career aligned with your interests and the latest developments in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Frederic Davi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles