World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 9997 9360 5263 4809 47 14133

Sandra H. Losoya publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sandra H. Losoya between 1997 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sandra H. Losoya published across 25 years, from 1997 to 2021, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2009. 1 of the 51 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2009. 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1997 2021

51 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sandra H. Losoya: publications per year, 1997 to 2021
Year Publications
1997 4
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 5
2004 6
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 4
2009 12
2010 3
2011 0
2012 2
2013 1
2014 1
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 51
Download as CSV

Sandra H. Losoya publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra H. Losoya sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 41–50 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 47 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52 47
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sandra H. Losoya D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra H. Losoya sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sandra H. Losoya is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research interests span psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on clinical psychology and behavioral neuroscience. The main topics addressed in their work include stress responses and cortisol, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and resilience and mental health.

Losoya's scholarly contributions include publications in notable venues. One recorded paper is titled "Dispositional Active Coping Predicts Patterns of Adolescents' Cortisol Responsivity in the Context of School-related Stressors," published in 2021 in the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

  • Dispositional Active Coping Predicts Patterns of Adolescents' Cortisol Responsivity in the Context of School-related Stressors (2021), Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Vanesa Pérez, Nancy A. Gonzales, Jenn-Yun Tein, Mariam Hanna Ibrahim, and Linda J. Luecken.

  • Vanesa Pérez
  • Nancy A. Gonzales
  • Jenn-Yun Tein
  • Mariam Hanna Ibrahim
  • Linda J. Luecken

Publication venues associated with Losoya's research are primarily within the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

The combination of their research areas and publication record suggests a sustained focus on understanding psychological and physiological responses to stress in young populations, emphasizing mechanisms of coping and resilience during childhood and adolescence.

Best Publications

  • The Relations of Regulation and Emotionality to Children's Externalizing and Internalizing Problem Behavior

    Nancy Eisenberg;Amanda Cumberland;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes

  • Longitudinal Relations of Children’s Effortful Control, Impulsivity, and Negative Emotionality to Their Externalizing, Internalizing, and Co-Occurring Behavior Problems

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Tracy L. Spinrad;Amanda Cumberland

  • The Relations of Parental Warmth and Positive Expressiveness to Children's Empathy-Related Responding and Social Functioning: A Longitudinal Study

    Qing Zhou;Nancy Eisenberg;Sandra H. Losoya;Richard A. Fabes

  • The Relations of Effortful Control and Impulsivity to Children's Resiliency and Adjustment

    Nancy Eisenberg;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes;Mark Reiser

  • Mothers' emotional expressivity and children's behavior problems and social competence: mediation through children's regulation.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Elizabeth Thompson Gershoff;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard

  • The relations of problem behavior status to children's negative emotionality, effortful control, and impulsivity: concurrent relations and prediction of change.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Adrienne Sadovsky;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes

  • Prediction of elementary school children's externalizing problem behaviors from attentional and behavioral regulation and negative emotionality.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie Shepard

  • The Relations of Regulation and Emotionality to Resiliency and Competent Social Functioning in Elementary School Children

    Nancy Eisenberg;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Richard A. Fabes;Mark Reiser

  • THEORY AND RESEARCH ON DESISTANCE FROM ANTISOCIAL ACTIVITY AMONG SERIOUS ADOLESCENT OFFENDERS

    Edward P. Mulvey;Laurence Steinberg;Jeffrey A. Fagan;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • Longitudinal relations among parental emotional expressivity, children's regulation, and quality of socioemotional functioning.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Amanda Sheffield Morris;Amanda Sheffield Morris;Richard A.P Fabes

  • Relation of Emotion-Related Regulation to Children's Social Competence: A Longitudinal Study

    Tracy L. Spinrad;Nancy Eisenberg;Amanda Cumberland;Richard A. Fabes

  • Parental socialization of children's dysregulated expression of emotion and externalizing problems

    Nancy Eisenberg;Sandra Losoya;Richard A. Fabes;Ivanna K. Guthrie

  • OPERATIONAL LESSONS FROM THE PATHWAYS TO DESISTANCE PROJECT.

    Carol A. Schubert;Edward P. Mulvey;Laurence Steinberg;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • ESTIMATING A DOSE‐RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LENGTH OF STAY AND FUTURE RECIDIVISM IN SERIOUS JUVENILE OFFENDERS*

    Thomas A. Loughran;Edward P. Mulvey;Carol A. Schubert;Jeffrey A. Fagan

  • The relations of effortful control and ego control to children's resiliency and social functioning

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Richard A. Fabes;Cynthia L. Smith

  • Developmental Issues in the Study of Coping

    Sandra Losoya;Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes

  • Prediction of children's empathy-related responding from their effortful control and parents' expressivity.

    Carlos Valiente;Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard

  • The relations of effortful control and reactive control to children's externalizing problems: a longitudinal assessment.

    Carlos Valiente;Nancy Eisenberg;Cynthia L. Smith;Mark Reiser

  • Origins of familial similarity in parenting: a study of twins and adoptive siblings.

    Sandra H. Losoya;Suzanne Callor;David C. Rowe;H. Hill Goldsmith

  • Emotional responding: Regulation, social correlates, and socialization.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Sandra Losoya

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg Arizona State University
Richard A. Fabes
Richard A. Fabes Arizona State University
Mark Reiser
Mark Reiser Arizona State University
Stephanie A. Shepard
Stephanie A. Shepard Brown University
Ivanna K. Guthrie
Ivanna K. Guthrie Arizona State University
Tracy L. Spinrad
Tracy L. Spinrad Arizona State University
Carlos Valiente
Carlos Valiente Arizona State University
Bridget C. Murphy
Bridget C. Murphy Arizona State University
Laurie Chassin
Laurie Chassin Arizona State University
George P. Knight
George P. Knight Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens the door to many rewarding career paths. One of the most popular and meaningful options is entering the field of social work. Aspiring professionals can pursue online degrees that fulfill core educational requirements, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments.

The requirements to practice as a social worker vary by state. For example, those interested in becoming a social worker in Illinois must complete state-approved education, gain supervised experience, and pass relevant exams. Similarly, becoming a social worker in Indiana involves specific licensure steps that can include internships or fieldwork.

If you plan to work in Iowa, be sure to check the Iowa social work license requirements, as these outline the credentials and exams needed to practice. In Kansas, aspiring professionals must meet Kansas social work education requirements including approved coursework and practical training.

By understanding these requirements and exploring accredited online programs, students can prepare for diverse careers wherever their goals take them.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra H. Losoya

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles