World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2034 1845 1185 1050 250 24793

Elizabeth Cauffman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth Cauffman between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth Cauffman published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 19 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 12 publications
1996 2025

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth Cauffman: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 4
2001 6
2002 1
2003 6
2004 7
2005 5
2006 5
2007 4
2008 6
2009 11
2010 16
2011 11
2012 11
2013 9
2014 13
2015 13
2016 15
2017 13
2018 13
2019 11
2020 14
2021 21
2022 15
2023 14
2024 7
2025 12
Total 271
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Cauffman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Cauffman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 250 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 250
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Cauffman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Cauffman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth Cauffman is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their primary research fields span Social Sciences and Psychology, with a significant emphasis on Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science as subfields.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Elizabeth Cauffman has contributed articles to a variety of publication venues where they have frequently published. These venues include:

  • Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
  • Law and Human Behavior
  • CrimRxiv
  • Development and Psychopathology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Elizabeth Cauffman highlight their focus on adolescent development, juvenile justice, and forensic psychology. Selected papers include:

  • "Adolescent decision making: A decade in review," published in 2021 in the Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • "Callous-Unemotional Traits and Risk of Gun Carrying and Use During Crime," published in 2020 in the American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Neurobiology of eating behavior, nutrition, and health," published in 2023 in the Journal of Internal Medicine
  • "Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest," published in 2021 in Development and Psychopathology
  • "Developing Cutoff Scores for the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) in Justice-Involved and Community Samples," published in 2021 in the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Elizabeth Cauffman collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Paul J. Frick
  • Laurence Steinberg
  • Jordan Beardslee
  • Adam Fine
  • Caitlin Cavanagh

Best Publications

  • Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model.

    Laurence Steinberg;Dustin Albert;Elizabeth Cauffman;Marie Banich

  • Age Differences in Future Orientation and Delay Discounting

    Laurence D. Steinberg;Sandra Graham;Lia O’Brien;Jennifer Woolard

  • Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making.

    Laurence Steinberg;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults.

    Elizabeth Cauffman;Laurence Steinberg

  • Juveniles' competence to stand trial: a comparison of adolescents' and adults' capacities as trial defendants.

    Thomas Grisso;Laurence Steinberg;Jennifer Woolard;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.

    Elizabeth Cauffman;Elizabeth P. Shulman;Laurence Steinberg;Eric Claus

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Female Juvenile Offenders

    Elizabeth Cauffman;S. Shirley Feldman;Jaime Waterman;Hans Steiner

  • Affiliation With Antisocial Peers, Susceptibility to Peer Influence, and Antisocial Behavior During the Transition to Adulthood

    Kathryn C. Monahan;Laurence Steinberg;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • AN EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK FOR STUDYING DESISTANCE AS A PROCESS

    Shawn D. Bushway;Alex R. Piquero;Lisa M. Broidy;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • Assessment of ``Juvenile Psychopathy'' and Its Association with Violence: A Critical Review

    John F. Edens;Jennifer L. Skeem;Keith R. Cruise;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • THEORY AND RESEARCH ON DESISTANCE FROM ANTISOCIAL ACTIVITY AMONG SERIOUS ADOLESCENT OFFENDERS

    Edward P. Mulvey;Laurence Steinberg;Jeffrey A. Fagan;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • It's Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty among High School and College Students

    Lene Arnett Jensen;Jeffrey Jensen Arnett;S.Shirley Feldman;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • Trajectories of Antisocial Behavior and Psychosocial Maturity From Adolescence to Young Adulthood

    Kathryn C. Monahan;Laurence Steinberg;Elizabeth Cauffman;Edward P. Mulvey

  • Patterns of Competence and Adjustment Among Adolescents from Authoritative, Authoritarian, Indulgent, and Neglectful Homes: A Replication in a Sample of Serious Juvenile Offenders

    Laurence Steinberg;Ilana Blatt-Eisengart;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • Are adolescents less mature than adults?: minors' access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA "flip-flop"

    Laurence Steinberg;Elizabeth Cauffman;Jennifer Woolard;Sandra Graham

  • OPERATIONAL LESSONS FROM THE PATHWAYS TO DESISTANCE PROJECT.

    Carol A. Schubert;Edward P. Mulvey;Laurence Steinberg;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • From the school yard to the squad car: school discipline, truancy, and arrest.

    Kathryn C. Monahan;Susan VanDerhei;Jordan Bechtold;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths.

    Thomas Grisso;Richard Barnum;Kenneth E. Fletcher;Elizabeth Cauffman

  • PSYCHOLOGICAL, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF SERIOUS ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN ADOLESCENCE: THE ROLE OF SELF‐CONTROL*

    Elizabeth Cauffman;Laurence Steinberg;Alex R. Piquero

  • Family rearing antecedents of pubertal timing.

    Jay Belsky;Laurence D. Steinberg;Renate M. Houts;Sarah L. Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurence Steinberg
Laurence Steinberg Temple University
Paul J. Frick
Paul J. Frick Louisiana State University
Alex R. Piquero
Alex R. Piquero University of Miami
Kathryn C. Monahan
Kathryn C. Monahan University of Pittsburgh
Eva R. Kimonis
Eva R. Kimonis University of New South Wales
Benjamin van Rooij
Benjamin van Rooij University of Amsterdam
Jeffrey Fagan
Jeffrey Fagan Columbia University
Glenn I. Roisman
Glenn I. Roisman University of Minnesota
Edward P. Mulvey
Edward P. Mulvey University of Pittsburgh
Sandra Graham
Sandra Graham University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens doors to various online degree options and specialized pathways, particularly in fields like marriage and family therapy (MFT). Many students explore online psychology degrees as a flexible route to start, before moving on to focus areas within counseling or therapy.

Requirements to become a marriage and family therapist can vary greatly by location. For instance, if you are curious about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Boston, you’ll see that licensure typically involves a master’s degree in a relevant field, supervised clinical experience, and passing a state exam. Similarly, mft requirements in Buffalo emphasize specialized coursework and state-specific licensing steps.

Educational standards are equally important elsewhere. If you’re looking at Chandler mft education requirements or are interested in Charlotte mft certification requirements, you’ll find that each city’s guidelines affect everything from degree selection to supervised practice hours.

Exploring these regional differences is essential for planning your education and maximizing your career opportunities as an aspiring mental health professional.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Cauffman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles