World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kostas A. Fanti

Kostas A. Fanti

Award Badge
Psychology
Cyprus
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6667 6209 1 1 142 8633

Kostas A. Fanti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kostas A. Fanti between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kostas A. Fanti published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2017. 25 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2017. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications
2004 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kostas A. Fanti: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 2
2012 4
2013 8
2014 7
2015 4
2016 14
2017 21
2018 13
2019 15
2020 7
2021 15
2022 6
2023 9
2024 13
2025 12
Total 161
Download as CSV

Kostas A. Fanti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kostas A. Fanti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 142
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kostas A. Fanti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kostas A. Fanti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Cyprus Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Cyprus Leader Award

Overview

Kostas A. Fanti is a researcher affiliated with the University of Cyprus in Cyprus, specializing primarily in the field of Psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Education.

The main focus of their research covers topics such as psychopathy and forensic psychiatry, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, personality disorders and psychopathology, stalking, cyberstalking, and harassment, deception detection and forensic psychology, child abuse and trauma, as well as bullying, victimization, and aggression.

Fanti's recent publications include the following papers:

  • "The DSM-5 Limited Prosocial Emotions Specifier for Conduct Disorder: Comorbid Problems, Prognosis, and Antecedents," 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Testing the predictive and incremental validity of callous-unemotional traits versus the multidimensional psychopathy construct in preschool children," 2020, Journal of Criminal Justice
  • "Stability and Change in Early Social Skills Development in Relation to Early School Performance: A Longitudinal Study of A Swedish Cohort," 2021, Early Education and Development
  • "Are Children High on Callous-Unemotional Traits Emotionally Blind? Testing Eye-Gaze Differences," 2021, Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • "Trajectories of Pure and Co-Occurring Internalizing and Externalizing Problems from Age 2 to Age 12: Findings from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care," 2022, Counseling And Psychological Services Dissertations (Georgia State University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Fanti include:

  • Olivier F. Colins
  • Ioannis Mavrommatis
  • Henrik Andershed
  • Georgia Soursou
  • Chara A. Demetriou

Fanti's research has been published consistently in several academic venues, notably:

  • Children
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • European Journal of Developmental Psychology

Best Publications

  • A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors

    Kostas A. Fanti;Andreas G. Demetriou;Veronica V. Hawa

  • Schools, parents, and youth violence: a multilevel, ecological analysis.

    Kathryn A. Brookmeyer;Kostas A. Fanti;Christopher C. Henrich

  • Linking Callous-Unemotional Traits to Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Forms of Aggression

    Kostas A. Fanti;Paul J. Frick;Stelios Georgiou

  • Trajectories of pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems from age 2 to age 12: findings from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care.

    Kostas A. Fanti;Christopher C. Henrich

  • Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation.

    Laurence Steinberg;Laurence Steinberg;Grace Icenogle;Elizabeth P. Shulman;Kaitlyn Breiner

  • Age Patterns in Risk Taking Across the World

    Natasha Duell;Laurence Steinberg;Grace Icenogle;Jason Chein

  • Bullying and Victimization: The Role of Conduct Problems and Psychopathic Traits

    Kostas A. Fanti;Eva R. Kimonis

  • The association of community violence exposure with middle-school achievement: A prospective study

    Christopher C Henrich;Mary Schwab-Stone;Kostas Fanti;Stephanie M Jones

  • Effects of Self-Esteem and Narcissism on Bullying and Victimization During Early Adolescence:

    Kostas A. Fanti;Christopher C. Henrich

  • Variants of callous-unemotional conduct problems in a community sample of adolescents.

    Kostas A. Fanti;Chara A. Demetriou;Eva R. Kimonis

  • Desensitization to media violence over a short period of time

    Kostas A. Fanti;Eric Vanman;Christopher C. Henrich;Marios N. Avraamides

  • Can Callous-Unemotional Traits be Reliably Measured in Preschoolers?

    Eva R. Kimonis;Kostas A. Fanti;Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous;Biran Mertan

  • Toward a Transactional Model of Parent-Adolescent Relationship Quality and Adolescent Psychological Adjustment

    Kostas A. Fanti;Christopher C. Henrich;Kathryn A. Brookmeyer;Gabriel P. Kuperminc

  • Understanding heterogeneity in conduct disorder: A review of psychophysiological studies.

    Kostas A. Fanti

  • Individual, Social, and Behavioral Factors Associated with Co-Occurring Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits

    Kostas A. Fanti

  • Maltreatment profiles among incarcerated boys with callous-unemotional traits

    Eva R. Kimonis;Eva R. Kimonis;Kostas A. Fanti;Zachary Isoma;Kathleen Donoghue;Kathleen Donoghue

  • Adolescents' cognitive capacity reaches adult levels prior to their psychosocial maturity: Evidence for a "maturity gap" in a multinational, cross-sectional sample.

    Grace Icenogle;Laurence Steinberg;Natasha Duell;Jason Chein

  • Using self-reported callous-unemotional traits to cross-nationally assess the DSM-5 ‘With Limited Prosocial Emotions’ specifier

    Eva R. Kimonis;Kostas A. Fanti;Paul J. Frick;Paul J. Frick;Terrie E. Moffitt;Terrie E. Moffitt

  • Psychopathic personality in the general population: differences and similarities across gender

    Olivier F. Colins;Kostas A. Fanti;Randall T. Salekin;Henrik Andershed

  • Stability and Change in Callous-Unemotional Traits : Longitudinal Associations With Potential Individual and Contextual Risk and Protective Factors

    Kostas A. Fanti;Olivier F. Colins;Henrik Andershed;Maria Sikki

  • Trajectories of Pure and Co-Occurring Internalizing and Externalizing Problems from Age 2 to Age 12: Findings from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care

    Kostas Andrea Fanti

Frequent Co-Authors

Olivier F. Colins
Olivier F. Colins Ghent University
Henrik Andershed
Henrik Andershed Örebro University
Eva R. Kimonis
Eva R. Kimonis University of New South Wales
Laurence Steinberg
Laurence Steinberg Temple University
Suha M. Al-Hassan
Suha M. Al-Hassan Abu Dhabi Early Childhood Authority
Paul J. Frick
Paul J. Frick Louisiana State University
Georgia Panayiotou
Georgia Panayiotou University of Cyprus
Randall T. Salekin
Randall T. Salekin University of Alabama
Christopher C. Henrich
Christopher C. Henrich University of Alabama at Birmingham
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. Whether you’re interested in counseling, research, or private practice, flexible degree options let you tailor your education to your professional goals.

For those aiming to become licensed therapists, it’s important to understand that requirements vary by state and even by city. For example, if you want to learn how to become a licensed therapist in Pittsburgh or about Plano licensed therapist requirements, you'll need to meet specific educational, clinical training, and licensing standards. Similarly, the process of becoming a licensed therapist in Port St. Lucie or understanding licensed therapist requirements in Portland may include local exams or specialized coursework.

Online psychology and counseling degrees often prepare you for these requirements, offering flexibility while still providing essential hands-on training. Careful research will help you choose the right pathway, no matter where you plan to practice in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Kostas A. Fanti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles