World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
6911
World Ranking
6764
National Ranking
3663

Michelle F. Wright publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle F. Wright sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michelle F. Wright D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle F. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michelle F. Wright is a researcher affiliated with Indiana State University in the United States. The primary fields of study for this scientist are Social Sciences and Psychology, with significant work also in subfields including Social Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their research focuses on topics related to adolescent development, digital environments, and psychosocial behaviors. Key areas of investigation include:

  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Education Discipline and Inequality

Michelle F. Wright has contributed to several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
  • Current Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • The Journal of Early Adolescence

Selected recent papers illustrate the focus on psychological needs, motivation, digital behavior, and mental health among youth. Examples include:

  • "Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination-a multi-country study," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Adolescent well-being and learning in times of COVID-19-A multi-country study of basic psychological need satisfaction, learning behavior, and the mediating roles of positive emotion and intrinsic motivation," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "How Are Consensual, Non-Consensual, and Pressured Sexting Linked to Depression and Self-Harm? The Moderating Effects of Demographic Variables," 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Assessing image-based sexual abuse: Measurement, prevalence, and temporal stability of sextortion and nonconsensual sexting ("revenge porn") among adolescents," 2022, Journal of Adolescence
  • "Online Hate Speech Victimization and Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents: The Protective Role of Resilience," 2022, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

Collaborative work is common, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Sebastian Wachs
  • Manuel Gámez-Guadix
  • Jun Sung Hong
  • Ikuko Aoyama
  • Ludwig Bilz

Best Publications

  • Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis.

    Jennifer J. Vogel;David S. Vogel;Jan Cannon-Bowers;Clint A. Bowers

  • The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: the moderating effect of peer rejection

    Michelle F. Wright;Yan Li

  • The associations between young adults' face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors

    Michelle F. Wright;Yan Li

  • Changes in attitudes toward seeking mental health services: a 40-year cross-temporal meta-analysis.

    Corey S. Mackenzie;Julie Erickson;Frank P. Deane;Michelle Wright

  • Adolescents’ Social Status Goals: Relationships to Social Status Insecurity, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior

    Yan Li;Michelle F. Wright

  • Normative Beliefs About Aggression and Cyber Aggression Among Young Adults: A Longitudinal Investigation

    Michelle F. Wright;Yan Li

  • The relationship between young adults' beliefs about anonymity and subsequent cyber aggression.

    Michelle F. Wright

  • Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination-a multi-country study.

    Elisabeth R Pelikan;Selma Korlat;Julia Reiter;Julia Holzer

  • Kicking the digital dog: a longitudinal investigation of young adults' victimization and cyber-displaced aggression.

    Michelle F. Wright;Yan Li

  • The meaning of online problematic situations for children: results of qualitative cross-cultural investigation in nine European countries

    David Smahel;Michelle F. Wright

  • Associations between Bystanders and Perpetrators of Online Hate: The Moderating Role of Toxic Online Disinhibition

    Sebastian Wachs;Michelle F. Wright

  • Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition

    Sebastian Wachs;Michelle F. Wright;Michelle F. Wright;Alexander T. Vazsonyi

  • Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents' popularity and cyber social behaviors

    Michelle F. Wright

  • Predictors of Anonymous Cyber Aggression: The Role of Adolescents' Beliefs About Anonymity, Aggression, and the Permanency of Digital Content

    Michelle F. Wright

  • The impact of digital media on health: children’s perspectives

    David Smahel;Michelle F. Wright;Martina Cernikova

  • Cyber Aggression Within Adolescents’ Romantic Relationships: Linkages to Parental and Partner Attachment

    Michelle F. Wright

  • Peer Attachment and Cyber Aggression Involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese Adolescents

    Michelle F. Wright;Ikuko Aoyama;Shanmukh V. Kamble;Zheng Li

  • Adolescents’ cyber aggression perpetration and cyber victimization: the longitudinal associations with school functioning

    Michelle F. Wright

  • Cyber victimization and perceived stress: Linkages to late adolescents’ cyber aggression and psychological functioning

    Michelle F. Wright

  • Parental mediation, cyberbullying, and cybertrolling

    Michelle F. Wright

  • The associations between cyberbullying and callous-unemotional traits among adolescents: The moderating effect of online disinhibition

    Michelle F. Wright;Michelle F. Wright;Bridgette D. Harper;Sebastian Wachs

  • Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age

    Michelle F. Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian Wachs
Sebastian Wachs University of Münster
Manuel Gámez-Guadix
Manuel Gámez-Guadix Autonomous University of Madrid
Shanmukh V. Kamble
Shanmukh V. Kamble Karnatak University
Jun Sung Hong
Jun Sung Hong Wayne State University
Alexander T. Vazsonyi
Alexander T. Vazsonyi University of Kentucky
Katariina Salmela-Aro
Katariina Salmela-Aro University of Helsinki
Jennie G. Noll
Jennie G. Noll Pennsylvania State University
Christiane Spiel
Christiane Spiel University of Vienna
Ann C. McKee
Ann C. McKee Boston University
Brett H. Graham
Brett H. Graham Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up diverse career opportunities, particularly in the growing field of behavioral analysis. Many students are now pursuing online degrees, which offer flexibility and access to accredited programs across the USA. One popular career pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role in high demand within clinical, educational, and community settings.

Navigating the BCBA certification process involves understanding state-specific requirements. For example, students interested in Cleveland bcba requirements must meet local standards for supervised experience and coursework. Likewise, those pursuing this career in Colorado Springs can benefit from resources outlining bcba certification requirements in Colorado Springs.

In other regions, like Ohio, it helps to review the steps for becoming a bcba in Columbus, ensuring all necessary exams and fieldwork are completed. Similarly, aspiring professionals in Texas can consult bcba certification requirements in Corpus Christi for region-specific guidance.

With online study options and clear certification pathways, building a career in behavioral psychology is more accessible than ever, no matter where you live in the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle F. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles