World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Xingchao Wang

Xingchao Wang

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 34 885 882 289 289 89 3731
Psychology 39 8669 8100 77 75 89 4704

Xingchao Wang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xingchao Wang between 2016 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xingchao Wang published across 10 years, from 2016 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2020. 24 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2016 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2020. 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 14 publications
2016 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xingchao Wang: publications per year, 2016 to 2025
Year Publications
2016 1
2017 5
2018 7
2019 9
2020 22
2021 17
2022 11
2023 15
2024 10
2025 14
Total 111
Download as CSV

Xingchao Wang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xingchao Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 89
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Xingchao Wang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xingchao Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Xingchao Wang is affiliated with Shanxi University in China and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and social sciences. Their work primarily focuses on topics related to adolescent behavior, social media use, and interpersonal dynamics.

Their recent publications include studies on the intersection of social media and adolescent psychology, with notable papers such as:

  • "Fear of missing out and problematic social media use as mediators between emotional support from social media and phubbing behavior" (2020, Addictive Behaviors)
  • "Parental Phubbing and Adolescents' Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Moderated Mediation Model of Moral Disengagement and Online Disinhibition" (2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence)
  • "Parent-adolescent congruence in phubbing and adolescents' depressive symptoms: A moderated polynomial regression with response surface analyses" (2020, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • "Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Cyberbullying Among Chinese Adolescents: A Mediation Model of Loneliness and Depression" (2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence)
  • "Callous-Unemotional traits and cyberbullying perpetration: The mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of empathy" (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)

Wang frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Gao Ling, Pengcheng Wang, Jiping Yang, Li Lei, and Shiyin Wang. These co-authorships highlight an active engagement in collaborative scientific inquiry.

Their work is often published in specific scientific venues, demonstrating a pattern of contributions to certain journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Current Psychology
  • Children and Youth Services Review
  • Psychology in the Schools

Xingchao Wang's research fields of study primarily span psychology with a strong focus on social sciences. Within these, their subfields of study involve social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, education, and health.

The main topics covered in their body of research include:

  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

This collection of research topics and publication venues indicates a focus on complex social behaviors and psychological challenges faced by youth, especially in the context of technology and digital interaction. The scholarly contributions reflect a concentrated effort in examining psychosocial development and interpersonal violence within adolescent populations.

Best Publications

  • Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length

    Xingchao Wang;Xiaochun Xie;Yuhui Wang;Pengcheng Wang

  • Peer relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction: The mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of the need to belong

    Pengcheng Wang;Meng Zhao;Xingchao Wang;Xiaochun Xie

  • Social networking sites addiction and adolescent depression: A moderated mediation model of rumination and self-esteem

    Pengcheng Wang;Xinyue Wang;Yingqiu Wu;Xiaochun Xie

  • Fear of missing out and problematic social media use as mediators between emotional support from social media and phubbing behavior.

    Jie Fang;Xingchao Wang;Zhonglin Wen;Jianfeng Zhou

  • Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents

    Xingchao Wang;Li Lei;Li Lei;Dong Liu;Huahua Hu

  • Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults

    Xingchao Wang;Li Yang;Jiping Yang;Pengcheng Wang

  • Childhood maltreatment and Chinese adolescents' bullying and defending: The mediating role of moral disengagement.

    Xingchao Wang;Li Yang;Ling Gao;Jiping Yang

  • Childhood maltreatment, moral disengagement, and adolescents' cyberbullying perpetration: Fathers' and mothers' moral disengagement as moderators

    Xingchao Wang;Jiping Yang;Pengcheng Wang;Li Lei

  • Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents

    Xingchao Wang;Li Lei;Jiping Yang;Ling Gao

  • Fear of Missing Out and Procrastination as Mediators Between Sensation Seeking and Adolescent Smartphone Addiction

    Jiayi Wang;Pengcheng Wang;Xiaofan Yang;Guohua Zhang

  • Cyberbullying and depression among Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model of social anxiety and neuroticism.

    Wei Wang;Xiaochun Xie;Xingchao Wang;Li Lei

  • The need to belong and adolescent authentic self-presentation on SNSs: A moderated mediation model involving FoMO and perceived social support

    Pengcheng Wang;Xiaochun Xie;Xingchao Wang;Xinyue Wang

  • The exacerbating role of perceived social support and the “buffering” role of depression in the relation between sensation seeking and adolescent smartphone addiction

    Pengcheng Wang;Li Lei;Xingchao Wang;Jia Nie

  • Envy and problematic smartphone use: The mediating role of FOMO and the moderating role of student-student relationship

    Pengcheng Wang;Xingchao Wang;Jia Nie;Pan Zeng

  • Parental phubbing, problematic smartphone use, and adolescents' learning burnout: A cross-lagged panel analysis

    Unknown

  • Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Cyberbullying Among Chinese Adolescents: A Mediation Model of Loneliness and Depression.

    Qianyun Jiang;Fengqing Zhao;Xiaochun Xie;Xingchao Wang

  • Parent-adolescent congruence in phubbing and adolescents' depressive symptoms: A moderated polynomial regression with response surface analyses.

    Qiyu Bai;Li Lei;Fang-Hsuan Hsueh;Xiaoqi Yu

  • Trait anger and aggression: A moderated mediation model of anger rumination and moral disengagement

    Xingchao Wang;Li Yang;Jiping Yang;Ling Gao

  • Callous-Unemotional traits and cyberbullying perpetration: The mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of empathy

    Jie Fang;Xingchao Wang;Ke-Hai Yuan;Zhonglin Wen

Frequent Co-Authors

Pengcheng Wang
Pengcheng Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Ke-Hai Yuan
Ke-Hai Yuan University of Notre Dame
Jasmine Fardouly
Jasmine Fardouly University of Sydney
Lenny R. Vartanian
Lenny R. Vartanian University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a variety of dynamic fields and career paths. For those looking to quickly enter the workforce, consider enrolling in one of the fastest human services online degree programs. These accelerated options are ideal for students eager to make an impact without spending years in school.

Specializations like sports psychology are also gaining popularity. A background in this area can lead to jobs in sports psychology, including roles supporting athletes’ mental health and performance at various levels, from local clubs to professional sports teams.

If you’re considering a master’s degree, it’s important to know your professional scope. Many wonder, can you diagnose with a masters in psychology? While a master’s can lead to many rewarding roles, diagnostic privileges often require further licensure and state-specific certifications.

For those interested in criminal justice, forensic psychology is a promising niche. With a master’s, you can pursue a career with a competitive forensic psychology salary master's degree, working with law enforcement, legal professionals, or rehabilitation agencies.

Best Scientists Citing Xingchao Wang

Trending Scientists