World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4753
World Ranking
9911
National Ranking
437

Janna Cousijn publications per year

2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 2 publications
2011 2026

189 publications in total across all disciplines

Janna Cousijn publication distribution in Psychology in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Janna Cousijn sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janna Cousijn D-index placement in Psychology in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Janna Cousijn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janna Cousijn is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work covers key topics including Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Mental Health Research Topics.

Janna Cousijn has contributed to a variety of recent publications, reflecting a focus on substance use and its neuropsychological correlates. Notable recent papers include:

  • The short-term and long-term effects of cannabis on cognition: recent advances in the field (2020, Current Opinion in Psychology)
  • Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of alcohol dependence: hippocampus and amygdala subregions in a sample of 966 people from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group (2021, Translational Psychiatry)
  • For better or for worse? A pre-post exploration of the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on cannabis users (2021, Addiction)
  • Associations between cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and mood disorders: longitudinal, genetic, and neurocognitive evidence (2021, Psychopharmacology)
  • How do substance use disorders compare to other psychiatric conditions on structural brain abnormalities? A cross-disorder meta-analytic comparison using the ENIGMA consortium findings (2020, Human Brain Mapping)

Frequent publication venues for Janna Cousijn include Addiction, Addiction Biology, Psychopharmacology, Human Brain Mapping, and Drug and Alcohol Dependence. These venues reflect the intersection of behavioral health, addiction research, and neuroscience in their work.

  • Addiction (19 publications)
  • Addiction Biology (5 publications)
  • Psychopharmacology (4 publications)
  • Human Brain Mapping (4 publications)
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (4 publications)

Their collaborative network includes several frequent co-authors with whom they have published extensively. Among these are Emese Kroon, Lauren Kuhns, Reínout W. Wiers, Francesca M. Filbey, and Valentina Lorenzetti.

  • Emese Kroon (37 co-authored papers)
  • Lauren Kuhns (29 co-authored papers)
  • Reínout W. Wiers (21 co-authored papers)
  • Francesca M. Filbey (18 co-authored papers)
  • Valentina Lorenzetti (16 co-authored papers)

Best Publications

  • Grey matter alterations associated with cannabis use: results of a VBM study in heavy cannabis users and healthy controls.

    Janna Cousijn;Reinout W. Wiers;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Wim van den Brink

  • Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use

    Janna Cousijn;Anna E. Goudriaan;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Mega-Analysis of Gray Matter Volume in Substance Dependence: General and Substance-Specific Regional Effects

    Scott Mackey;Nicholas Allgaier;Bader Chaarani;Philip Spechler

  • Recovery of neurocognitive functions following sustained abstinence after substance dependence and implications for treatment.

    Mieke H J Schulte;Janna Cousijn;Tess E den Uyl;Anna E Goudriaan

  • Neural responses associated with cue-reactivity in frequent cannabis users

    Janna Cousijn;Anna E. Goudriaan;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Wim van den Brink

  • Age-related differences in the impact of cannabis use on the brain and cognition: a systematic review.

    Claire Gorey;Lauren Kuhns;Eleni Smaragdi;Emese Kroon

  • Effect of baseline cannabis use and working-memory network function on changes in cannabis use in heavy cannabis users: a prospective fMRI study

    Janna Cousijn;Reinout W. Wiers;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Wim van den Brink

  • Heavy cannabis use, dependence and the brain : a clinical perspective

    Emese Kroon;Lauren Kuhns;Eva Hoch;Janna Cousijn

  • Individual differences in decision making and reward processing predict changes in cannabis use: a prospective functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Janna Cousijn;Reinout W. Wiers;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Wim van den Brink

  • Adolescent resilience to addiction: a social plasticity hypothesis.

    Janna Cousijn;Maartje Luijten;Sarah W Feldstein Ewing

  • Cannabis dependence, cognitive control and attentional bias for cannabis words.

    J. Cousijn;P. Watson;L. Koenders;W.A.M. Vingerhoets

  • Approach-bias predicts development of cannabis problem severity in heavy cannabis users: results from a prospective FMRI study

    Janna Cousijn;Anna E. Goudriaan;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Wim van den Brink

  • The short-term and long-term effects of cannabis on cognition: recent advances in the field.

    Emese Kroon;Lauren Kuhns;Janna Cousijn

  • Recommendations for international gambling harm-minimisation guidelines: comparison with effective public health policy

    Sally M Gainsbury;Matthijs Blankers;Matthijs Blankers;Claire Wilkinson;Claire Wilkinson;Karen Schelleman-Offermans

  • Grey Matter Changes Associated with Heavy Cannabis Use: A Longitudinal sMRI Study

    Laura Koenders;Janna Cousijn;Janna Cousijn;Wilhelmina A. M. Vingerhoets;Wilhelmina A. M. Vingerhoets;Wim van den Brink

  • Attempted Training of Alcohol Approach and Drinking Identity Associations in US Undergraduate Drinkers: Null Results from Two Studies

    Kristen P. Lindgren;Reinout W. Wiers;Bethany A. Teachman;Melissa L. Gasser

  • Subcortical surface morphometry in substance dependence: An ENIGMA addiction working group study

    Yann Chye;Scott Mackey;Boris A. Gutman;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Dissociable roles of mGlu5 and dopamine receptors in the rewarding and sensitizing properties of morphine and cocaine.

    M. M. J. Veeneman;H. Boleij;M. H. Broekhoven;E. M. S. Snoeren

  • Relationship between working-memory network function and substance use: a 3-year longitudinal fMRI study in heavy cannabis users and controls

    Janna Cousijn;Janna Cousijn;Wilhelmina A M Vingerhoets;Laura Koenders;Lieuwe de Haan

  • Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of alcohol dependence: hippocampus and amygdala subregions in a sample of 966 people from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group

    Sally Grace;Maria Gloria Rossetti;Maria Gloria Rossetti;Nicholas Allen;Nicholas Allen;Albert Batalla

  • Time to acknowledge the mixed effects of cannabis on health: a summary and critical review of the NASEM 2017 report on the health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids.

    Janna Cousijn;Adrián E. Núñez;Adrián E. Núñez;Francesca M. Filbey

Frequent Co-Authors

Valentina Lorenzetti
Valentina Lorenzetti Australian Catholic University
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Anna E. Goudriaan
Anna E. Goudriaan University of Amsterdam
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
Nadia Solowij
Nadia Solowij University of Wollongong
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Patricia J. Conrod
Patricia J. Conrod University of Montreal
Rajita Sinha
Rajita Sinha Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology unlocks a variety of online degree programs and career opportunities throughout the United States. One rapidly growing pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a highly sought-after credential for professionals specializing in behavioral interventions and applied behavior analysis (ABA).

Those interested in this field should be aware that bcba certification requirements in Chicago emphasize supervised experience and passing the national BCBA exam. Requirements may differ based on your location; for example, aspiring analysts should research Chula Vista bcba requirements or look into Cincinnati bcba requirements for relevant regional differences.

Additionally, licensure regulations and accepted degree programs vary by state. For instance, those considering work in Ohio must familiarize themselves with Cleveland bcba requirements. By exploring online psychology degrees, you can prepare for flexible and rewarding career pathways like counseling, education, research, and ABA therapy. Be sure to review local requirements wherever you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Janna Cousijn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles