World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4742 4392 266 258 168 14148

Nadia Solowij publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nadia Solowij between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nadia Solowij published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1998. 12 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1998. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 15 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
1987 2025

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nadia Solowij: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 0
1995 4
1996 3
1997 1
1998 15
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 5
2003 0
2004 3
2005 0
2006 7
2007 2
2008 6
2009 4
2010 11
2011 5
2012 9
2013 9
2014 5
2015 4
2016 15
2017 13
2018 12
2019 11
2020 5
2021 10
2022 4
2023 5
2024 4
2025 8
Total 189
Download as CSV

Nadia Solowij publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Solowij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nadia Solowij D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Solowij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nadia Solowij is affiliated with the University of Wollongong in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience with significant contributions in subfields such as Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, and Physiology.

The main topics in their body of work include:

  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders

Frequent publication venues for Nadia Solowij's work are:

  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Psychopharmacology
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Collaborations with other researchers include frequent coauthors such as:

  • Valentina Lorenzetti
  • Murat Yücel
  • Janna Cousijn
  • Chao Suo
  • Lisa-Marie Greenwood

Notable recent publications include:

  • Consensus paper of the WFSBP task force on cannabis, cannabinoids and psychosis, 2022, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
  • Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of alcohol dependence: hippocampus and amygdala subregions in a sample of 966 people from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group, 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • Mapping cortical and subcortical asymmetries in substance dependence: Findings from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group, 2021, Addiction Biology
  • Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Brain Morphology: A Review of the Evidence, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Cannabidiol induces autophagy and improves neuronal health associated with SIRT1 mediated longevity, 2022, GeroScience

Best Publications

  • Adverse effects of cannabis

    Wayne Hall;Nadia Solowij

  • Cognitive functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users seeking treatment.

    Nadia Solowij;Robert S Stephens;Roger A Roffman;Thomas Babor

  • Acute and Chronic Effects of Cannabinoids on Human Cognition—A Systematic Review

    Samantha J. Broyd;Hendrika H. van Hell;Camilla Beale;Murat Yücel

  • Regional brain abnormalities associated with long-term heavy cannabis use.

    Murat Yucel;Nadia Solowij;Colleen Respondek;Sarah Whittle

  • Recreational MDMA use in Sydney: a profile of ecstasy users and their experiences with the drug

    Nadia Solowij;Wayne Hall;Nicole Lee

  • The Chronic Effects of Cannabis on Memory in Humans: A Review

    Nadia Solowij;Robert Battisti

  • Ecstasy use in Australia: patterns of use and associated harm.

    Libby Topp;Julie Hando;Paul Dillon;Ann Roche

  • Cannabis and Cognitive Functioning

    Nadia Solowij

  • Effect of long-term cannabis use on axonal fibre connectivity

    Andrew Zalesky;Nadia Solowij;Murat Yucel;Dan I Lubman

  • The Impact of Cannabis Use on Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Existing Findings and New Data in a First-Episode Sample

    Murat Yücel;Emre Bora;Daniel I Lubman;Nadia Solowij

  • Differential impairments of selective attention due to frequency and duration of cannabis use

    Nadia Solowij;Patricia T. Michie;Allison M. Fox;Allison M. Fox

  • Verbal learning and memory in adolescent cannabis users, alcohol users and non-users

    Nadia Solowij;Katy Jones;Katy Jones;Megan Rozman;Sasha Davis

  • Computerized and Virtual Reality Cognitive Training for Individuals at High Risk of Cognitive Decline: Systematic Review of the Literature

    Hannah Coyle;Victoria Traynor;Nadia Solowij

  • Mega-Analysis of Gray Matter Volume in Substance Dependence: General and Substance-Specific Regional Effects

    Scott Mackey;Nicholas Allgaier;Bader Chaarani;Philip Spechler

  • Cannabis and cognitive dysfunction: parallels with endophenotypes of schizophrenia?

    Nadia Solowij;Patricia T. Michie

  • A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study

    Murat Yücel;Erin Oldenhof;Serge H. Ahmed;David Belin

  • The Role of Cannabinoids in Neuroanatomic Alterations in Cannabis Users

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Valentina Lorenzetti;Nadia Solowij;Murat Yücel;Murat Yücel

  • Understanding drug addiction: a neuropsychological perspective

    Murat Yücel;Dan I. Lubman;Nadia Solowij;Warrick J. Brewer

  • Do cognitive impairments recover following cessation of cannabis use

    Nadia Solowij

  • Effects of long-term cannabis use on selective attention: an event-related potential study.

    Nadia Solowij;Patricia T. Michie;Allison M. Fox

  • A randomised controlled trial of vaporised Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol alone and in combination in frequent and infrequent cannabis users: acute intoxication effects

    Nadia Solowij;Samantha J Broyd;Lisa-Marie Greenwood;Hendrika H van Hell

Frequent Co-Authors

Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Valentina Lorenzetti
Valentina Lorenzetti Australian Catholic University
Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
Patricia T. Michie
Patricia T. Michie University of Newcastle Australia
Janna Cousijn
Janna Cousijn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Alex Fornito
Alex Fornito Monash University
Rodney J. Croft
Rodney J. Croft University of Wollongong
Anna E. Goudriaan
Anna E. Goudriaan University of Amsterdam
Sarah Whittle
Sarah Whittle University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online degree in Psychology can open doors to diverse career pathways, including becoming a licensed mental health counselor. Many students pursue online bachelor's and master's degrees as a flexible way to meet academic requirements. However, it’s crucial to understand that each state has unique certification and licensing regulations for counselors.

For instance, if you aim to practice in Tennessee, it's important to know the Nashville mental health counselor certification requirements. Those interested in Louisiana should review the specific mental health counselor requirements in New Orleans. Similarly, New York City mental health counselor certification requirements may differ significantly from other locations.

In New Jersey, familiarizing yourself with Newark mental health counselor certification requirements can help you plan educational and clinical experience accordingly. Always check state and city-specific pathways to ensure your online degree aligns with your professional goals. By understanding these nuances, you’ll be well-prepared to pursue a meaningful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Nadia Solowij

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles