World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7569 7059 443 432 132 7034

Valentina Lorenzetti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Valentina Lorenzetti between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Valentina Lorenzetti published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2025. 38 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2025. 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 24 publications
2009 2025

178 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Valentina Lorenzetti: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 8
2010 8
2011 2
2012 5
2013 5
2014 4
2015 3
2016 14
2017 12
2018 10
2019 13
2020 15
2021 18
2022 8
2023 15
2024 14
2025 24
Total 178
Download as CSV

Valentina Lorenzetti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valentina Lorenzetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 132
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Valentina Lorenzetti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valentina Lorenzetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Valentina Lorenzetti is a researcher affiliated with the Australian Catholic University in Australia. Their work spans several areas within medicine and neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on pharmacology and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research interests are reflected in publications focusing on cannabis use, brain health, and substance abuse treatment outcomes. Key topics include:

  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Lorenzetti has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a large volume of publications in pharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, epidemiology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Adolescent cannabis use, cognition, brain health and educational outcomes: A review of the evidence," 2020, European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "The International Cannabis Toolkit (iCannToolkit): a multidisciplinary expert consensus on minimum standards for measuring cannabis use," 2021, Addiction
  • "Focused attention meditation in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional functional MRI studies," 2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Resting-state neuroimaging in social anxiety disorder: a systematic review," 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of alcohol dependence: hippocampus and amygdala subregions in a sample of 966 people from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group," 2021, Translational Psychiatry

Lorenzetti has collaborated frequently with several researchers across the cannabis and neuroscience research communities, including:

  • Murat Yücel
  • Tom P. Freeman
  • Nadia Solowij
  • Janna Cousijn
  • Chao Suo

The venues where Lorenzetti regularly publishes include:

  • Addiction
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Best Publications

  • Structural brain abnormalities in major depressive disorder: A selective review of recent MRI studies

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Nicholas Brian Allen;Alexander Fornito;Murat Yucel

  • The anticipation and outcome phases of reward and loss processing: a neuroimaging meta-analysis of the monetary incentive delay task

    Stuart Oldham;Carsten Murawski;Alex Fornito;George J. Youssef

  • Effect of long-term cannabis use on axonal fibre connectivity

    Andrew Zalesky;Nadia Solowij;Murat Yucel;Dan I Lubman

  • Mega-Analysis of Gray Matter Volume in Substance Dependence: General and Substance-Specific Regional Effects

    Scott Mackey;Nicholas Allgaier;Bader Chaarani;Philip Spechler

  • A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study

    Murat Yücel;Erin Oldenhof;Serge H. Ahmed;David Belin

  • The Role of Cannabinoids in Neuroanatomic Alterations in Cannabis Users

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Valentina Lorenzetti;Nadia Solowij;Murat Yücel;Murat Yücel

  • Hippocampal harms, protection and recovery following regular cannabis use

    Murat Yucel;Valentina Lorenzetti;C Suo;Andrew Zalesky

  • Adolescent cannabis use, cognition, brain health and educational outcomes : A review of the evidence

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Eva Hoch;Wayne Hall

  • Functional Connectivity in Brain Networks Underlying Cognitive Control in Chronic Cannabis Users

    Ian H Harding;Nadia Solowij;Ben J Harrison;Michael Takagi

  • Structural MRI Findings in Long-Term Cannabis Users: What Do We Know?

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Dan I. Lubman;Sarah Whittle;Nadia Solowij

  • Gross morphological brain changes with chronic, heavy cannabis use.

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Nadia Solowij;Sarah Whittle;Alex Fornito

  • Does regular cannabis use affect neuroanatomy? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Yann Chye;Pedro Silva;Nadia Solowij

  • Volumetric MRI study of the insular cortex in individuals with current and past major depression.

    Tsutomu Takahashi;Tsutomu Takahashi;Murat Yucel;Valentina Lorenzetti;Ryoichiro Tanino

  • Defining Compulsive Behavior

    Judy Luigjes;Valentina Lorenzetti;Sanneke de Haan;George J. Youssef;George J. Youssef

  • The Association between Regular Cannabis Exposure and Alterations of Human Brain Morphology: An Updated Review of the Literature

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Nadia Solowij;Alex Fornito;Dan Ian Lubman

  • From Socioeconomic Disadvantage to Obesity: The Mediating Role of Psychological Distress and Emotional Eating

    Jade Spinosa;Paul Christiansen;Joanne M. Dickson;Valentina Lorenzetti

  • An MRI study of the superior temporal subregions in patients with current and past major depression.

    Tsutomu Takahashi;Murat Yucel;Valentina Lorenzetti;Mark Walterfang

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the neural correlates of psychological therapies in major depression

    Anjali Sankar;Alice Melin;Valentina Lorenzetti;Paul Horton

  • Focused attention meditation in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional functional MRI studies

    Unknown

  • Amygdala volumes in a sample of current depressed and remitted depressed patients and healthy controls.

    Valentina Lorenzetti;Nicholas Brian Allen;Sarah Whittle;Murat Yucel

Frequent Co-Authors

Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Nadia Solowij
Nadia Solowij University of Wollongong
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Janna Cousijn
Janna Cousijn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
Nicholas B. Allen
Nicholas B. Allen University of Oregon
Mark Walterfang
Mark Walterfang University of Melbourne
Leonardo F. Fontenelle
Leonardo F. Fontenelle Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Sarah Whittle
Sarah Whittle University of Melbourne
Alex Fornito
Alex Fornito Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA can open up a variety of rewarding career options in mental health. One popular path is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), as demand for qualified professionals is growing nationwide. Each state has its own specific educational and licensing requirements, which are important to understand before starting your journey.

If you are interested in the field, researching mft requirements in Henderson can give you insight into the necessary graduate programs and state approvals in Nevada. Similarly, those looking at opportunities in Hawaii should review the mft requirements in Honolulu to understand local distinctions.

For those interested in larger urban settings, explore how to become a marriage and family therapist in Houston to learn about Texas licensure and job prospects. If you prefer a smaller community or regional city, review the steps on how to become an mft in Huntsville as an example of Alabama’s requirements.

Exploring these resources can help you choose the right online degree and map out your professional pathway, whether you plan to practice locally or across state lines.

Best Scientists Citing Valentina Lorenzetti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles