World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 33 9490 9128 380 375 201 2828

Franco Concli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Franco Concli between 2010 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Franco Concli published across 17 years, from 2010 to 2026, averaging 12.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2021. 39 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2021. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 4 publications
2010 2026

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Franco Concli: publications per year, 2010 to 2026
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 0
2012 7
2013 6
2014 5
2015 2
2016 5
2017 9
2018 7
2019 15
2020 16
2021 36
2022 20
2023 26
2024 22
2025 35
2026 4
Total 216
Download as CSV

Franco Concli publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franco Concli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 201 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403 201
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Franco Concli D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franco Concli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189 33
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Franco Concli is affiliated with the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano in Italy. Their research activity is primarily situated in the field of Engineering, with a focus on Mechanical Engineering and its related subfields. They have contributed notably to areas such as Mechanics of Materials, Automotive Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

The main topics of their research work include:

  • Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
  • Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
  • Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Cellular and Composite Structures

Recent publications by Franco Concli cover a range of subjects within these domains, especially focusing on lattice structures, gear mechanics, and fluid dynamics applied to mechanical components. Selected papers include:

  • A Review of the Selective Laser Melting Lattice Structures and Their Numerical Models, 2020, Advanced Engineering Materials
  • Compressive behavior assessment of a newly developed circular cell-based lattice structure, 2021, Materials & Design
  • Oil distribution and churning losses of gearboxes: Experimental and numerical analysis, 2020, Tribology International
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied to Lubricated Mechanical Components: Review of the Approaches to Simulate Gears, Bearings, and Pumps, 2020, Applied Sciences
  • Gear Root Bending Strength: A Comparison Between Single Tooth Bending Fatigue Tests and Meshing Gears, 2021, Journal of Mechanical Design

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Lorenzo Maccioni
  • Lorenzo Fraccaroli
  • Marco Nicola Mastrone
  • Lorenzo Pagliari
  • Seyedahmad Taghizadeh

Contributions from Franco Concli have been published repeatedly in specific scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets comprise:

  • Applied Sciences
  • International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements
  • WIT transactions on engineering sciences
  • Forschung im Ingenieurwesen
  • Lubricants

Best Publications

  • A Review of the Selective Laser Melting Lattice Structures and Their Numerical Models

    Zaki Alomar;Franco Concli

  • Numerical modeling of the power losses in geared transmissions: Windage, churning and cavitation simulations with a new integrated approach that drastically reduces the computational effort

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla

  • Hydraulic losses of a gearbox: CFD analysis and experiments

    Carlo Gorla;Franco Concli;Karsten Stahl;Bernd-Robert Höhn

  • CFD Simulations of Splash Losses of a Gearbox

    Carlo Gorla;Franco Concli;Karsten Stahl;Bernd-Robert Höhn

  • Compressive behavior assessment of a newly developed circular cell-based lattice structure

    Zaki Alomar;Franco Concli

  • Numerical modeling of the churning power losses in planetary gearboxes: An innovative partitioning-based meshing methodology for the application of a computational effort reduction strategy to complex gearbox configurations

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla

  • Oil distribution and churning losses of gearboxes: Experimental and numerical analysis

    Marco Nicola Mastrone;Erwin Adi Hartono;Valery Chernoray;Franco Concli

  • Windage, churning and pocketing power losses of gears: different modeling approaches for different goals

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied to Lubricated Mechanical Components: Review of the Approaches to Simulate Gears, Bearings, and Pumps

    Lorenzo Maccioni;Franco Concli

  • Churning power losses of ordinary gears: a new approach based on the internal fluid dynamics simulations

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla;Augusto Della Torre;Gianluca Montenegro

  • Gear Root Bending Strength: A Comparison Between Single Tooth Bending Fatigue Tests and Meshing Gears

    Luca Bonaiti;Ahmed Bayoumi Mahmoud Bayoumi;Franco Concli;Francesco Rosa

  • Windage Power Losses of Ordinary Gears: Different CFD Approaches Aimed to the Reduction of the Computational Effort

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla;Augusto Della Torre;Gianluca Montenegro

  • Study of the impact of aeration on the lubricant behavior in a tapered roller bearing: Innovative numerical modelling and validation via particle image velocimetry

    Lorenzo Maccioni;Valery Chernoray;Marco Nicola Mastrone;Christof Bohnert

  • Numerical and experimental assessment of the mechanical properties of 3D printed 18-Ni300 steel trabecular structures produced by Selective Laser Melting – a lean design approach

    Franco Concli;Andrea Gilioli

  • A mixed FEM and lumped-parameter dynamic model for evaluating the modal properties of planetary gearboxes

    Franco Concli;Luca Cortese;Renato Vidoni;Filippo Nalli

  • Lubrication of gearboxes: CFD analysis of a cycloidal gear set

    Franco Concli;Lorenzo Maccioni;Carlo Gorla

  • Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) for gears: Contact and bending fatigue behavior

    Franco Concli

  • Pressure distribution in small hydrodynamic journal bearings considering cavitation: a numerical approach based on the open‐source CFD code OpenFOAM®

    Franco Concli

  • Analysis of power losses in an industrial planetary speed reducer: Measurements and computational fluid dynamics calculations

    Franco Concli;Edoardo Conrado;Carlo Gorla

  • A New Integrated Approach for the Prediction of the Load Independent Power Losses of Gears: Development of a Mesh-Handling Algorithm to Reduce the CFD Simulation Time

    F. Concli;A. Della Torre;C. Gorla;G. Montenegro

  • Thermal and efficiency characterization of a low-backlash planetary gearbox: An integrated numerical-analytical prediction model and its experimental validation

    Franco Concli

  • Innovative Meshing Strategies for Bearing Lubrication Simulations

    Franco Concli;Christian Thomas Schaefer;Christof Bohnert

  • A CFD ANALYSIS OF THE OIL SQUEEZING POWER LOSSES OF A GEAR PAIR

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla

  • Low-loss gears precision planetary gearboxes: reduction of the load dependent power losses and efficiency estimation through a hybrid analytical-numerical optimization tool

    F. Concli

  • Oil Squeezing Power Losses In Gears:A CFD Analysis

    F. Concli;C. Gorla

  • Influence Of Lubricant Temperature, Lubricant Level And Rotational Speed On The Churning Power Loss In An Industrial Planetary Speed Reducer: Computational And Experimental Study

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla

  • Analysis of the Oil Squeezing Power Losses of a Spur Gear Pair by Mean of CFD Simulations

    Franco Concli;Carlo Gorla

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Giglio
Marco Giglio Polytechnic University of Milan
Andrea Manes
Andrea Manes Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of online education in Engineering and Technology is evolving rapidly. Flexible options now enable students to pursue specialized credentials on their own schedules. For those seeking an accelerated path, 6 months masters degree programs allow professionals to quickly gain advanced expertise and elevate their careers.

Not every pathway requires a full degree. Many students and working adults explore certification programs that target in-demand skills and can lead directly to high-paying roles in tech and engineering fields. These certifications often offer a faster, cost-effective route into specialized careers.

Online options are also a game-changer for non-traditional students. For example, college programs for moms provide the flexibility required to balance family and education, making STEM fields more accessible to a wider audience.

If you need to learn quickly, many institutions now offer 6 week online courses that fit into even the busiest schedules. These short-format courses are ideal for building foundational skills, exploring new interests, or upskilling for immediate job opportunities in engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Franco Concli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles