World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
39
Citations
5556
World Ranking
2147
National Ranking
72

Marco Giglio publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Giglio sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 357 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Marco Giglio D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Giglio sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Giglio is affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Milan in Italy and has contributed extensively to the engineering field, focusing primarily on civil and structural engineering, mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, materials chemistry, and control and systems engineering.

Their research addresses topics such as structural health monitoring techniques, ultrasonics and acoustic wave propagation, non-destructive testing techniques, mechanical behavior of composites, high-velocity impact and material behavior, structural response to dynamic loads, and machine fault diagnosis techniques.

Some recent papers by Marco Giglio include:

  • Numerical study on the dynamic progressive failure due to low-velocity repeated impacts in thin CFRP laminated composite plates, 2021, Thin-Walled Structures
  • Shape sensing and damage identification with iFEM on a composite structure subjected to impact damage and non-trivial boundary conditions, 2020, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
  • Comparison of strain pre-extrapolation techniques for shape and strain sensing by iFEM of a composite plate subjected to compression buckling, 2021, Composite Structures
  • FE coupled to SPH numerical model for the simulation of high-velocity impact on ceramic based ballistic shields, 2020, Ceramics International
  • Analytical and numerical modelling of high-velocity impact on multilayer alumina/aramid fiber composite ballistic shields: Improvement in modelling approaches, 2020, Composites Part B Engineering

Marco Giglio frequently publishes in venues including:

  • Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
  • e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing
  • Composite Structures
  • Structural Health Monitoring
  • Procedia Structural Integrity

Coauthors with whom Marco Giglio has collaborated extensively include:

  • Claudio Sbarufatti
  • Andrea Manes
  • Francesco Cadini
  • Luca Lomazzi
  • Daniele Oboe

Their body of work comprises over 300 publications, reflecting a broad engagement in engineering disciplines, particularly in areas related to materials and structural integrity under dynamic and impact loading conditions.

Best Publications

  • Adaptive prognosis of lithium-ion batteries based on the combination of particle filters and radial basis function neural networks

    Claudio Sbarufatti;Matteo Corbetta;Marco Giglio;Francesco Cadini

  • State-of-life prognosis and diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries by data-driven particle filters

    F. Cadini;C. Sbarufatti;F. Cancelliere;M. Giglio

  • Experimental tests and numerical modelling of ballistic impacts against Kevlar 29 plain-woven fabrics with an epoxy matrix: Macro-homogeneous and Meso-heterogeneous approaches

    Luca Mario Bresciani;Andrea Manes;A. Ruggiero;G. Iannitti

  • Investigations on sandwich core properties through an experimental–numerical approach

    M. Giglio;A. Manes;A. Gilioli

  • Numerical investigation of a three point bending test on sandwich panels with aluminum skins and Nomex™ honeycomb core

    M. Giglio;A. Gilioli;A. Manes

  • Anti-icing and de-icing coatings based Joule's heating of graphene nanoplatelets

    O. Redondo;S.G. Prolongo;M. Campo;C. Sbarufatti

  • Ductile fracture locus of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy

    M. Giglio;A. Manes;F. Viganò

  • Analysis of strain rate behavior of an Al 6061 T6 alloy

    A. Manes;Lorenzo Peroni;Martina Scapin;M. Giglio

  • Numerical study on the dynamic progressive failure due to low-velocity repeated impacts in thin CFRP laminated composite plates

    M. Rezasefat;Alvaro Gonzalez-Jimenez;M. Giglio;A. Manes

  • Life prediction of a wire rope subjected to axial and bending loads

    M. Giglio;A. Manes

  • Predicting ballistic impact failure of aluminium 6061-T6 with the rate-independent Bao–Wierzbicki fracture model

    A. Gilioli;A. Manes;M. Giglio;T. Wierzbicki

  • Definition of a load adaptive baseline by inverse finite element method for structural damage identification

    Luca Colombo;C. Sbarufatti;M. Giglio

  • Compression after impact test (CAI) on NOMEX™ honeycomb sandwich panels with thin aluminum skins

    Andrea Gilioli;Claudio Sbarufatti;Andrea Manes;Marco Giglio

  • Perforation and penetration of aluminium target plates by armour piercing bullets

    A. Manes;F. Serpellini;M. Pagani;M. Saponara

  • Shape sensing and damage identification with iFEM on a composite structure subjected to impact damage and non-trivial boundary conditions

    Luca Colombo;Daniele Oboe;Claudio Sbarufatti;Francesco Cadini

  • Influence of projectile and thickness on the ballistic behavior of aramid composites: Experimental and numerical study

    Stephanie Gonçalves Nunes;Riccardo Scazzosi;Andrea Manes;Sandro Campos Amico

  • A methodology for automatic crack propagation modelling in planar and shell FE models

    Daniele Colombo;M Giglio

  • Comparison of strain pre-extrapolation techniques for shape and strain sensing by iFEM of a composite plate subjected to compression buckling

    Daniele Oboe;Luca Colombo;Claudio Sbarufatti;Marco Giglio

  • Performance optimization of a diagnostic system based upon a simulated strain field for fatigue damage characterization

    C. Sbarufatti;A. Manes;M. Giglio

  • Optimization of nonlinear, non-Gaussian Bayesian filtering for diagnosis and prognosis of monotonic degradation processes

    Matteo Corbetta;Claudio Sbarufatti;Marco Giglio;Michael Douglas Todd

  • Application of sensor technologies for local and distributed structural health monitoring

    Claudio Sbarufatti;Andrea Manes;Marco Giglio

  • An experimental–numerical investigation on aluminium tubes subjected to ballistic impact with soft core 7.62 ball projectiles

    Andrea Manes;Davide Lumassi;Lorenzo Giudici;Marco Giglio

  • Effect of riveting process parameters on the local stress field of a T-joint

    A. Manes;M. Giglio;F. Viganò

  • A Bayesian framework for fatigue life prediction of composite laminates under co-existing matrix cracks and delamination

    Matteo Corbetta;Claudio Sbarufatti;Marco Giglio;Abhinav Saxena

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Manes
Andrea Manes Polytechnic University of Milan
Sandro Campos Amico
Sandro Campos Amico Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Abhinav Saxena
Abhinav Saxena General Electric (United States)
Stefano Beretta
Stefano Beretta Polytechnic University of Milan
Mario Guagliano
Mario Guagliano Polytechnic University of Milan
Vincenzo Spagnolo
Vincenzo Spagnolo Polytechnic University of Bari
Kai Goebel
Kai Goebel Palo Alto Research Center
Frank K. Tittel
Frank K. Tittel Rice University
Franco Concli
Franco Concli Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Vittorio M. N. Passaro
Vittorio M. N. Passaro Polytechnic University of Bari

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, related fields offer valuable online degree options. For example, an accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online program can complement engineering disciplines focused on human factors and ergonomics, enabling graduates to work in interdisciplinary roles.

When considering graduate studies in related areas like speech pathology, understanding "how many slp grad schools should I apply to" is crucial. Applying to multiple programs increases acceptance chances and allows students to find the best fit for their career goals and budgets.

It's also helpful to explore options like the easiest speech pathology programs to get into, which may offer more accessible admission standards while maintaining program quality. This is essential for students balancing application demands with rigorous engineering coursework.

Cost is another key consideration; reviewing the online speech pathology degree tuition and fees helps prospective students plan finances effectively. Exploring these interconnected pathways ensures diverse career opportunities aligned with one’s skills and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Giglio

Trending Scientists