World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 40 1991 1844 17 17 110 8107

Pedro M. A. Areias publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pedro M. A. Areias between 2001 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pedro M. A. Areias published across 21 years, from 2001 to 2021, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2016. 12 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2016. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications
2001 2021

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pedro M. A. Areias: publications per year, 2001 to 2021
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 4
2005 4
2006 8
2007 3
2008 3
2009 1
2010 3
2011 3
2012 6
2013 9
2014 4
2015 10
2016 12
2017 7
2018 5
2019 8
2020 5
2021 7
Total 108
Download as CSV

Pedro M. A. Areias publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro M. A. Areias sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 107–116 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 110 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113 110
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Pedro M. A. Areias D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro M. A. Areias sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104 40
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mathematical analysis
  • Thermodynamics
  • Geometry

His scientific interests lie mostly in Mathematical analysis, Discretization, Extended finite element method, Structural engineering and Fracture mechanics. The study incorporates disciplines such as Geometry, Shell and Finite strain theory in addition to Mathematical analysis. Extended finite element method is a subfield of Finite element method that he explores.

His Finite element method research incorporates themes from Shear band, Deflection and Fracture. His studies examine the connections between Structural engineering and genetics, as well as such issues in Discontinuity, with regards to Nyström method and Quartic function. His Fracture mechanics research integrates issues from Porosity, Local mesh refinement and Electromagnetic shielding.

His most cited work include:

  • A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes (522 citations)
  • A meshfree thin shell method for non‐linear dynamic fracture (369 citations)
  • Analysis of three‐dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method (280 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Pedro M. A. Areias mainly investigates Finite element method, Finite strain theory, Mathematical analysis, Structural engineering and Constitutive equation. Pedro M. A. Areias works in the field of Finite element method, focusing on Extended finite element method in particular. His Finite strain theory research includes elements of Plasticity, Tetrahedron, Geometry, Hyperelastic material and Applied mathematics.

He is interested in Discretization, which is a field of Mathematical analysis. He has researched Structural engineering in several fields, including Discontinuity and Mechanical engineering. His Constitutive equation study combines topics in areas such as Strain rate and Kinematics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Finite element method (54.70%)
  • Finite strain theory (57.26%)
  • Mathematical analysis (43.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Finite strain theory (57.26%)
  • Finite element method (54.70%)
  • Mathematical analysis (43.59%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Finite strain theory, Finite element method, Mathematical analysis, Tetrahedron and Applied mathematics. His Finite strain theory study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Fracture mechanics and Fracture. His Finite element method study which covers Flow that intersects with Shear stress.

His work blends Mathematical analysis and Coulomb studies together. His work investigates the relationship between Tetrahedron and topics such as Stress that intersect with problems in Variational principle, Hexahedron and Hyperelastic material. His research integrates issues of Hill yield criterion, Algebraic equation, Nonlinear system, Constitutive equation and Differential equation in his study of Applied mathematics.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A NURBS-based inverse analysis of thermal expansion induced morphing of thin shells (16 citations)
  • Surface-based and solid shell formulations of the 7-parameter shell model for layered CFRP and functionally graded power-based composite structures (6 citations)
  • An objective and path-independent 3D finite-strain beam with least-squares assumed-strain formulation (2 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Algebra
  • Mathematical analysis
  • Composite material

Pedro M. A. Areias mainly focuses on Finite strain theory, Shell, Finite element method, Nonlinear system and Applied mathematics. His Finite strain theory research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Cauchy stress tensor, Mathematical analysis and Tensor. His Shell research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Power, Composite number and Surface.

Pedro M. A. Areias conducted interdisciplinary study in his works that combined Finite element method and SHELL model. His Nonlinear system study incorporates themes from Beam, Quadratic equation, Singularity, Constitutive equation and Robustness. His research on Applied mathematics often connects related areas such as Kinematics.

Best Publications

  • A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes

    Jeong-Hoon Song;Pedro M. A. Areias;Ted Belytschko

  • A meshfree thin shell method for non‐linear dynamic fracture

    T. Rabczuk;P. M. A. Areias;T. Belytschko

  • Analysis of three‐dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method

    Pedro M. A. Areias;Ted Belytschko

  • An extended isogeometric thin shell analysis based on Kirchhoff-Love theory

    N. Nguyen-Thanh;N. Valizadeh;M. N. Nguyen;H. Nguyen-Xuan

  • Fracture properties prediction of clay/epoxy nanocomposites with interphase zones using a phase field model

    Mohammed A. Msekh;Mohammed A. Msekh;N. H. Cuong;Goangseup Zi;P. Areias

  • Damage and fracture algorithm using the screened Poisson equation and local remeshing

    P. Areias;P. Areias;M.A. Msekh;T. Rabczuk;T. Rabczuk

  • Abaqus implementation of phase-field model for brittle fracture

    Mohammed A. Msekh;Mohammed A. Msekh;Juan Michael Sargado;Mostafa Jamshidian;Pedro Miguel Areias

  • Phase-field analysis of finite-strain plates and shells including element subdivision

    P. Areias;P. Areias;Timon Rabczuk;Timon Rabczuk;M. A. Msekh;M. A. Msekh

  • Isogeometric analysis of large-deformation thin shells using RHT-splines for multiple-patch coupling

    N. Nguyen-Thanh;K. Zhou;X. Zhuang;P. Areias

  • Finite strain fracture of plates and shells with configurational forces and edge rotations

    P. Areias;T. Rabczuk

  • A Meshfree Thin Shell for Arbitrary Evolving Cracks Based on An Extrinsic Basis

    Timon Rabczuk;Pedro Areias

  • Element-wise fracture algorithm based on rotation of edges

    P. Areias;T. Rabczuk;D. Dias-da-Costa

  • A simplified mesh-free method for shear bands with cohesive surfaces

    Timon Rabczuk;P. M.A. Areias;Ted Belytschko

  • Non-linear analysis of shells with arbitrary evolving cracks using XFEM

    Pedro M. A. Areias;Ted Belytschko

  • A non-ordinary state-based peridynamics formulation for thermoplastic fracture

    J. Amani;E. Oterkus;P. Areias;Goangseup Zi

  • Effective 2D and 3D crack propagation with local mesh refinement and the screened Poisson equation

    P. Areias;J. Reinoso;P. P. Camanho;J. César de Sá

  • Steiner-point free edge cutting of tetrahedral meshes with applications in fracture

    P. Areias;P. Areias;Timon Rabczuk

  • Finite strain fracture of 2D problems with injected anisotropic softening elements

    P. Areias;T. Rabczuk;P.P. Camanho

  • Analysis of fracture in thin shells by overlapping paired elements

    Pedro M.A. Areias;J.H. Song;Ted Belytschko

  • Development of shear locking‐free shell elements using an enhanced assumed strain formulation

    José M. A. César de Sá;Renato M. Natal Jorge;Robertt A. Fontes Valente;Pedro M. Almeida Areias

Frequent Co-Authors

Timon Rabczuk
Timon Rabczuk Bauhaus University, Weimar
Daniel Dias-da-Costa
Daniel Dias-da-Costa University of Sydney
Ted Belytschko
Ted Belytschko Northwestern University
Pedro P. Camanho
Pedro P. Camanho University of Porto
Eduardo Júlio
Eduardo Júlio Instituto Superior Técnico
Goangseup Zi
Goangseup Zi Korea University
Xiaoying Zhuang
Xiaoying Zhuang University of Hannover
Lambertus J. Sluys
Lambertus J. Sluys Delft University of Technology
Renato Natal Jorge
Renato Natal Jorge University of Porto
Yuri Bazilevs
Yuri Bazilevs Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, considering related fields can broaden career opportunities. Many professionals transition into specialized roles requiring additional expertise, such as counseling or behavioral analysis. For those interested in helping communities and individuals, pursuing a counselling degree online offers flexible options that can complement an engineering background.

Veterans seeking education pathways compatible with military experience may find programs like the speech pathology degree online for veterans especially supportive. These programs recognize prior service and offer tailored online learning environments.

For those motivated by law enforcement or forensic science, understanding the education and job outlook of the fbi behavioral analysis unit can reveal alternative career pathways that blend analytical skills with human behavior studies.

Additionally, accelerated options like fast track speech pathology programs provide efficient routes to certification, appealing to those eager to apply their technical skills in health-related fields quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro M. A. Areias

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles