World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 42 1854 1716 45 44 190 5998

Indra Vir Singh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Indra Vir Singh between 2002 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Indra Vir Singh published across 20 years, from 2002 to 2021, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 25 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications
2002 2021

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Indra Vir Singh: publications per year, 2002 to 2021
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 8
2008 0
2009 3
2010 5
2011 10
2012 8
2013 17
2014 19
2015 15
2016 15
2017 16
2018 13
2019 15
2020 13
2021 12
Total 184
Download as CSV

Indra Vir Singh publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Indra Vir Singh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 190 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140 190
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Indra Vir Singh D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Indra Vir Singh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107 42
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Finite element method
  • Thermodynamics

Indra Vir Singh focuses on Structural engineering, Stress intensity factor, Extended finite element method, Classification of discontinuities and Boundary value problem. Paris' law is the focus of her Structural engineering research. Her Stress intensity factor study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Discontinuity and Material properties.

Her research integrates issues of Partition of unity and Mechanics, Computer simulation in her study of Extended finite element method. Her work in Classification of discontinuities covers topics such as Degrees of freedom which are related to areas like Polygon, Face and Displacement. Her studies examine the connections between Boundary value problem and genetics, as well as such issues in Lagrange multiplier, with regards to Geometry, Weight function and Applied mathematics.

Her most cited work include:

  • The numerical simulation of fatigue crack growth using extended finite element method (152 citations)
  • Numerical simulation of functionally graded cracked plates using NURBS based XIGA under different loads and boundary conditions (107 citations)
  • Meshless element free Galerkin method for unsteady nonlinear heat transfer problems (88 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary areas of investigation include Extended finite element method, Finite element method, Structural engineering, Stress intensity factor and Composite material. Her Extended finite element method research integrates issues from von Mises yield criterion, Stress, Work, Computer simulation and Creep. Her work carried out in the field of Finite element method brings together such families of science as Lagrange multiplier and Mathematical analysis, Boundary value problem, Ramp function.

Indra Vir Singh combines subjects such as Geometry and Heat transfer with her study of Mathematical analysis. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mechanics and Classification of discontinuities. Her research investigates the link between Stress intensity factor and topics such as Heaviside step function that cross with problems in Stress field and Singularity.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Extended finite element method (40.48%)
  • Finite element method (35.71%)
  • Structural engineering (34.52%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Extended finite element method (40.48%)
  • Mechanics (19.64%)
  • Finite element method (35.71%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary scientific interests are in Extended finite element method, Mechanics, Finite element method, Continuum damage mechanics and Composite material. Her Extended finite element method study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Structural engineering. The Mechanics study combines topics in areas such as Edge, Work, Stress intensity factor and Displacement.

Her Finite element method research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Applied mathematics, Degrees of freedom and Fracture. The concepts of her Composite material study are interwoven with issues in Thermo elastic and Orthotropic material. Her studies in Paris' law integrate themes in fields like Ultimate tensile strength, Ductility, Tension and Fatigue limit.

Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Creep crack simulations using continuum damage mechanics and extended finite element method (31 citations)
  • A new framework based on continuum damage mechanics and XFEM for high cycle fatigue crack growth simulations (27 citations)
  • A comparative study and ABAQUS implementation of conventional and localizing gradient enhanced damage models (24 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Composite material
  • Finite element method
  • Thermodynamics

Indra Vir Singh mostly deals with Extended finite element method, Finite element method, Continuum damage mechanics, Structural engineering and Mechanics. Her studies deal with areas such as State variable and Work as well as Extended finite element method. Her Finite element method research incorporates elements of Volume fraction, Algorithm and Classification of discontinuities.

Her work deals with themes such as Homogenization, Applied mathematics and Strain energy, which intersect with Volume fraction. Indra Vir Singh regularly links together related areas like Smoothed finite element method in her Structural engineering studies. The various areas that she examines in her Mechanics study include Paris' law, Stress, Stress intensity factor and Degrees of freedom.

Best Publications

  • The numerical simulation of fatigue crack growth using extended finite element method

    I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra;S. Bhattacharya;R.U. Patil

  • An adaptive multiscale phase field method for brittle fracture

    R.U. Patil;B.K. Mishra;I.V. Singh

  • Numerical simulation of functionally graded cracked plates using NURBS based XIGA under different loads and boundary conditions

    Gagandeep Bhardwaj;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra;T.Q. Bui

  • Meshless element free Galerkin method for unsteady nonlinear heat transfer problems

    Akhilendra Singh;Indra Vir Singh;Ravi Prakash

  • Fatigue crack growth simulations of interfacial cracks in bi-layered FGMs using XFEM

    S. Bhattacharya;I. V. Singh;B. K. Mishra;T. Q. Bui

  • Fatigue crack growth simulations of 3-D problems using XFEM

    Himanshu Pathak;Akhilendra Singh;Indra Vir Singh

  • A numerical solution of composite heat transfer problems using meshless method

    I.V. Singh

  • HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINS USING MESHLESS ELEMENT FREE GALERKIN METHOD

    I. V. Singh;K. Sandeep;Ravi Prakash

  • Effect of interface on the thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites

    Indra Vir Singh;Masataka Tanaka;Morinobu Endo

  • A homogenized XFEM approach to simulate fatigue crack growth problems

    Sachin Kumar;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra

  • Numerical simulation of bi-material interfacial cracks using EFGM and XFEM

    Himanshu Pathak;Akhilendra Singh;Indra Vir Singh

  • Tensile and impact-toughness behaviour of cryorolled Al 7075 alloy

    P. Das;R. Jayaganthan;I.V. Singh

  • Stochastic fatigue crack growth simulation of interfacial crack in bi-layered FGMs using XIGA

    G. Bhardwaj;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra

  • A new multiscale XFEM for the elastic properties evaluation of heterogeneous materials

    R.U. Patil;B.K. Mishra;I.V. Singh

  • A simple, efficient and accurate Bézier extraction based T-spline XIGA for crack simulations

    S.K. Singh;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra;G. Bhardwaj

  • New enrichments in XFEM to model dynamic crack response of 2-D elastic solids

    Sachin Kumar;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra;Akhilendra Singh

  • A comparative study and ABAQUS implementation of conventional and localizing gradient enhanced damage models

    Subrato Sarkar;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra;A.S. Shedbale

  • A new framework based on continuum damage mechanics and XFEM for high cycle fatigue crack growth simulations

    V.B. Pandey;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra;S. Ahmad

  • Modeling and simulation of kinked cracks by virtual node XFEM

    Sachin Kumar;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra;Timon Rabczuk

  • Numerical simulation of thermo-elastic fracture problems using element free Galerkin method

    Mohit Pant;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra

  • Evaluation of mixed mode stress intensity factors for interface cracks using EFGM

    Mohit Pant;I.V. Singh;B.K. Mishra

Frequent Co-Authors

B.K. Mishra
B.K. Mishra Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
R. Jayaganthan
R. Jayaganthan Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Akhilendra Singh
Akhilendra Singh Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Himanshu Pathak
Himanshu Pathak Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Tinh Quoc Bui
Tinh Quoc Bui Duy Tan University
Subhamoy Bhattacharya
Subhamoy Bhattacharya University of Surrey
Timon Rabczuk
Timon Rabczuk Bauhaus University, Weimar
Sundararajan Natarajan
Sundararajan Natarajan Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Apurbba Kumar Sharma
Apurbba Kumar Sharma Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Stéphane Bordas
Stéphane Bordas University of Luxembourg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA opens doors to various specialized career paths, but it's also important to consider related fields that can complement your skills or offer alternative routes. For example, veterans interested in transitioning to technical roles can explore programs like speech pathology degree online for veterans, which provide flexible learning tailored to their unique needs.

For those seeking accelerated education options, understanding programs such as the best 5 year speech pathology programs can illustrate how streamlined learning paths are becoming more prevalent across disciplines. This trend highlights the potential for quicker entry into professional roles without sacrificing quality.

Career options like becoming an FBI profiler demonstrate that engineering graduates can leverage their analytical skills beyond traditional fields. To learn more about these specialized roles, explore guides such as profiler job insights, which detail education requirements and job outlook.

Finally, understanding fields related to human behavior and mental health can expand your career horizon. For example, reviewing the types of therapist degrees can help you identify roles that combine technical skills with interpersonal development—an increasingly valuable combination in many industries.

Best Scientists Citing Indra Vir Singh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles