World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marie Vandekerckhove

Marie Vandekerckhove

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9860 9229 141 132 115 5184

Marie Vandekerckhove publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marie Vandekerckhove between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marie Vandekerckhove published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2014. 5 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2014. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marie Vandekerckhove: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 3
2008 4
2009 5
2010 6
2011 13
2012 15
2013 8
2014 24
2015 7
2016 12
2017 3
2018 4
2019 4
2020 3
2021 4
2022 2
2023 8
2024 1
2025 4
Total 137
Download as CSV

Marie Vandekerckhove publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie Vandekerckhove sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marie Vandekerckhove D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie Vandekerckhove sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marie Vandekerckhove is a researcher affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. Their work focuses primarily on psychology and neuroscience, covering a range of subfields including clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, neurology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics of research addressed by the scientist include various aspects of sleep and wakefulness research, sleep and related disorders, mental health research topics, long-term effects of COVID-19, functional brain connectivity studies, as well as anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, and psychosomatic disorders and their treatments.

Marie Vandekerckhove has authored numerous articles, with recent publications reflecting diverse interests:

  • Consciousness beyond the human case, 2023, Current Biology
  • Systematic review: REM sleep, dysphoric dreams and nightmares as transdiagnostic features of psychiatric disorders with emotion dysregulation - Clinical implications, 2024, Sleep Medicine
  • Bottom-Up and Cognitive Top-Down Emotion Regulation: Experiential Emotion Regulation and Cognitive Reappraisal on Stress Relief and Follow-Up Sleep Physiology, 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Longitudinal changes in global structural brain connectivity and cognitive performance in former hospitalized COVID-19 survivors: an exploratory study, 2023, Experimental Brain Research
  • Emotion regulation ability compensates for the depression-related negativity bias, 2021, Acta Psychologica

Publications by Vandekerckhove and colleagues are frequently found in journals such as the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Scientific Reports, Current Biology, Sleep Medicine, and Experimental Brain Research.

Collaborations have played a role in Vandekerckhove's research output. Frequent coauthors include Peter Van Schuerbeek, Johan De Mey, Laurence Claes, Livia De Picker, and Bruno Tassignon.

Best Publications

  • Social cognition and the cerebellum: a meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies.

    Frank Van Overwalle;Kris Baetens;Peter Mariën;Marie Vandekerckhove

  • Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988)

    E. J. Wagenmakers;Titia Beek;Laura Dijkhoff;Quentin F. Gronau

  • The emotional brain and sleep: An intimate relationship.

    Marie Vandekerckhove;Raymond Cluydts

  • Engagement of lateral and medial prefrontal areas in the ecphory of sad and happy autobiographical memories.

    Hans J Markowitsch;Marie M P Vandekerckhove;Heinrich Lanfermann;Michael O Russ

  • Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease.

    Matthias Brand;Fabian Grabenhorst;Katrin Starcke;Marie M.P. Vandekerckhove

  • Collaborative regulations of vitality in early childhood : stress in intimate relationships and postnatal psychopathology

    Colwyn Trevarthen;Kenneth J. Aitken;Marie Vandekerckhove;Jonathan Delafield‐Butt

  • Counterfactual thinking: an fMRI study on changing the past for a better future

    Nicole Van Hoeck;Ning Ma;Lisa Ampe;Kris Baetens

  • Emotion, emotion regulation and sleep: An intimate relationship

    Marie Vandekerckhove;Yu-lin Wang;Yu-lin Wang

  • The role of presleep negative emotion in sleep physiology

    M Vandekerckhove;R Weiss;C Schotte;Vasileios Exadaktylos

  • The influence of pre-sleep cognitive arousal on sleep onset processes

    Johan Wuyts;Elke De Valck;Marie Vandekerckhove;Nathalie Pattyn;Nathalie Pattyn

  • Implicit and explicit social mentalizing: dual processes driven by a shared neural network

    Frank Van Overwalle;Marie Vandekerckhove

  • A neurocognitive theory of higher mental emergence: From anoetic affective experiences to noetic knowledge and autonoetic awareness

    Marie Vandekerckhove;Jaak Panksepp

  • Spontaneous and intentional trait inferences recruit a common mentalizing network to a different degree: Spontaneous inferences activate only its core areas

    Ning Ma;Marie Vandekerckhove;Frank Van Overwalle;Ruth Seurinck

  • Sleep misperception, EEG characteristics and Autonomic Nervous System activity in primary insomnia: A retrospective study on polysomnographic data

    J Maes;J Verbraecken;M Willemen;I De Volder

  • The flow of anoetic to noetic and autonoetic consciousness: a vision of unknowing (anoetic) and knowing (noetic) consciousness in the remembrance of things past and imagined futures.

    Marie Vandekerckhove;Jaak Panksepp

  • Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences

    Ning Ma;Marie Vandekerckhove;Kris Baetens;Frank Van Overwalle

  • Abnormal brain activation during threatening face processing in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

    Debo Dong;Yulin Wang;Yulin Wang;Xiaoyan Jia;Yingjia Li

  • Cerebellar areas dedicated to social cognition? A comparison of meta-analytic and connectivity results

    Frank Van Overwalle;Kris Baetens;Peter Mariën;Marie Vandekerckhove

  • Bi-hemispheric engagement in the retrieval of autobiographical episodes.

    Marie M P Vandekerckhove;Hans J Markowitsch;Markus Mertens;Friedrich G Woermann

  • Regulating Emotions: Culture, Social Necessity, and Biological Inheritance

    Marie Vandekerckhove;Christian von Scheve;Sven Ismer;Susanne Jung

  • False belief and counterfactual reasoning in a social environment.

    Nicole Van Hoeck;Elizabet Begtas;Johan Steen;Jenny Kestemont

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Van Overwalle
Frank Van Overwalle Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Raymond Cluydts
Raymond Cluydts Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Peter Mariën
Peter Mariën Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Axel Cleeremans
Axel Cleeremans Université Libre de Bruxelles
Hans J. Markowitsch
Hans J. Markowitsch Bielefeld University
Jan De Maeseneer
Jan De Maeseneer Ghent University
Daniele Marinazzo
Daniele Marinazzo Ghent University
Wim Fias
Wim Fias Ghent University
James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree opens a range of flexible options to kickstart or advance your career. Many students begin by exploring the easiest online psychology bachelor's programs in Florida, which cater to diverse schedules and learning styles.

Alternatively, some learners look into the easiest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston for regional opportunities and specialized curriculum. Both of these bachelor’s routes can provide foundational knowledge for entry-level jobs or support further study.

For those aiming higher, advanced degrees are offered through the easiest online psychology master's degrees in California. Master’s programs help deepen expertise and can lead to roles in counseling, research, or education.

Professionals seeking top-tier qualifications may consider the easiest online psychology doctorate programs in the US. These doctorate paths are ideal for those targeting leadership, academic, or clinical positions.

Exploring these online degree options ensures students can balance their education with personal and professional commitments while advancing toward a fulfilling psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Marie Vandekerckhove

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles