World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
9538
World Ranking
5683
National Ranking
98

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
10161
World Ranking
5316
National Ranking
260

Maria Leggio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Leggio sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maria Leggio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Leggio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Leggio is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with substantial work in subfields including neurology, cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, psychiatry, mental health, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The main topics covered in their research include vestibular and auditory disorders, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, functional brain connectivity studies, hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, neurological disorders, treatments, and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Maria Leggio has coauthored multiple papers with frequent collaborators such as Giusy Olivito, Libera Siciliano, Michela Lupo, Silvia Clausi, and Marco Bozzali.

Their recent publications include:

  • Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition, 2020, published in The Cerebellum
  • Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Ageing, 2023, published in The Cerebellum
  • Cerebellar dentate nucleus functional connectivity with cerebral cortex in Alzheimer's disease and memory: a seed-based approach, 2020, published in Neurobiology of Aging
  • The neurobiological underpinning of the social cognition impairments in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, 2021, published in Cortex
  • The cerebellum is linked to theory of mind alterations in autism. A direct clinical and MRI comparison between individuals with autism and cerebellar neurodegenerative pathologies, 2021, published in Autism Research

Publication venues where this scientist frequently publishes include The Cerebellum, Biomedicines, Journal of Neurology, Neurobiology of Aging, and Cortex.

Best Publications

  • Environmental enrichment promotes improved spatial abilities and enhanced dendritic growth in the rat.

    Maria Giuseppa Leggio;Laura Mandolesi;Francesca Federico;Francesca Federico;Francesca Spirito

  • Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Emotion

    M Adamaszek;Federico D'Agata;R. Ferrucci;C. Habas

  • Consensus Paper: Language and the Cerebellum: an Ongoing Enigma

    Peter Mariën;Herman Ackermann;Michael Adamaszek;Caroline H S Barwood

  • Consensus Paper: The Role of the Cerebellum in Perceptual Processes

    Oliver Baumann;Ronald J. Borra;Ronald J. Borra;James M. Bower;Kathleen E. Cullen

  • Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions

    Marco Molinari;Maria G. Leggio;Alessandra Solida;Roberto Ciorra

  • The cerebellum contributes to linguistic production: A case of agrammatic speech following a right cerebellar lesion

    Maria Caterina Silveri;Maria Giuseppa Leggio;Marco Molinari

  • Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition

    Frank Van Overwalle;Mario Manto;Zaira Cattaneo;Silvia Clausi

  • The cerebellar cognitive profile

    Anna M. Tedesco;Francesca R. Chiricozzi;Silvia Clausi;Michela Lupo

  • Phonological grouping is specifically affected in cerebellar patients: a verbal fluency study

    Maria Giuseppa Leggio;Maria Caterina Silveri;Laura Petrosini;Marco Molinari

  • On whether the environmental enrichment may provide cognitive and brain reserves.

    Laura Petrosini;Paola De Bartolo;Francesca Foti;Francesca Gelfo

  • Cerebellar Sequencing: a Trick for Predicting the Future

    Maria Leggio;M. Molinari

  • The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome: a Task Force Paper

    Georgios P D Argyropoulos;Kim van Dun;Michael Adamaszek;Maria Leggio

  • Verbal short-term store-rehearsal system and the cerebellum. Evidence from a patient with a right cerebellar lesion.

    M C Silveri;A M Di Betta;V Filippini;M G Leggio

  • Cognitive sequencing impairment in patients with focal or atrophic cerebellar damage.

    M. G. Leggio;A. M. Tedesco;F. R. Chiricozzi;S. Clausi

  • Cerebellum and Detection of Sequences, from Perception to Cognition

    Marco Molinari;Francesca R. Chiricozzi;Silvia Clausi;Anna Maria Tedesco

  • Auditory thalamocortical pathways defined in monkeys by calcium‐binding protein immunoreactivity

    M. Molinari;M. E. Dell'Anna;E. Rausell;M. G. Leggio

  • Neurobiology of Rhythmic Motor Entrainment

    Marco Molinari;Maria G. Leggio;Martina De Martin;Antonio Cerasa

  • The cerebellum in the spatial problem solving: a co-star or a guest star?

    Laura Petrosini;Maria G Leggio;Marco Molinari

  • Visuospatial abilities in cerebellar disorders.

    M Molinari;L Petrosini;S Misciagna;M G Leggio

  • Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study

    Domenico Restuccia;Giacomo Della Marca;Massimiliano Valeriani;Maria Giuseppa Leggio

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura Petrosini
Laura Petrosini Sapienza University of Rome
Marco Bozzali
Marco Bozzali Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Mara Cercignani
Mara Cercignani Cardiff University
Maria Caterina Silveri
Maria Caterina Silveri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Domenico Restuccia
Domenico Restuccia Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Raffaele Nardone
Raffaele Nardone Paracelsus Medical University
V. Di Lazzaro
V. Di Lazzaro Università Campus Bio-Medico
Jeremy D. Schmahmann
Jeremy D. Schmahmann Harvard Medical School
Edward G. Jones
Edward G. Jones University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a variety of career opportunities in healthcare, research, biotechnology, and more. If you’re looking to accelerate your education, consider enrolling in accelerated programs. These options allow students to complete their degree faster, entering the workforce or graduate programs ahead of schedule.

Career growth and salary prospects are important factors when selecting a major. Neuroscience-related degrees are often listed among the top degrees in the world and recognized as some of the highest paying college majors. This can lead to rewarding roles in pharmaceuticals, clinical research, or neurotechnology sectors.

Whether studying in-person or online, financial assistance is crucial for many students. You can explore the best online colleges that accept fafsa to find affordable, accredited programs that offer federal financial aid, making your academic journey both accessible and cost-effective.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Leggio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles