World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
81
Citations
21885
World Ranking
1584
National Ranking
142

Dagmar Timmann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Timmann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 406 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Dagmar Timmann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Timmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dagmar Timmann is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields primarily focused on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader areas, Timmann's work delves into more specialized subfields such as:

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The topics primarily addressed in their research cover a range of neurological and genetic disorders, including:

  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Vestibular and Auditory Disorders
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Dagmar Timmann's publication record includes a number of recent papers, reflecting a focus on neurodegeneration, cerebellar function, and imaging techniques. Selected recent papers are:

  • Natural History, Phenotypic Spectrum, and Discriminative Features of Multisystemic RFC1 Disease (2021, Neurology)
  • Real-life gait assessment in degenerative cerebellar ataxia (2020, Neurology)
  • Update cerebellum and cognition (2021, Journal of Neurology)
  • CerebNet: A fast and reliable deep-learning pipeline for detailed cerebellum sub-segmentation (2022, NeuroImage)
  • Brain Structure and Degeneration Staging in Friedreich Ataxia: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumetrics from the ENIGMA-Ataxia Working Group (2021, Annals of Neurology)

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Matthis Synofzik
  • Lüdger Schöls
  • Andreas Thieme
  • Kathrin Reetz
  • Jennifer Faber

Timmann frequently publishes in scientific venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurology
  • The Cerebellum
  • Movement Disorders
  • Brain

Best Publications

  • Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

    Mario Manto;James M. Bower;Adriana Bastos Conforto;José M. Delgado-García

  • Consensus Paper: Language and the Cerebellum: an Ongoing Enigma

    Peter Mariën;Herman Ackermann;Michael Adamaszek;Caroline H S Barwood

  • The human cerebellum contributes to motor, emotional and cognitive associative learning. A review

    D. Timmann;J. Drepper;M. Frings;M. Maschke

  • Imaging the deep cerebellar nuclei: a probabilistic atlas and normalization procedure.

    Jörn Diedrichsen;Jörn Diedrichsen;Stefan Maderwald;Stefan Maderwald;Michael Küper;Markus Thürling;Markus Thürling

  • Consensus Paper: Revisiting the Symptoms and Signs of Cerebellar Syndrome

    Florian Bodranghien;Amy Bastian;Carlo Casali;Mark Hallett

  • Localization of a cerebellar timing process using PET

    M. Jueptner;M. Rijntjes;C. Weiller;J. H. Faiss

  • Cerebellar contributions to cognitive functions: A progress report after two decades of research

    Dagmar Timmann;Irene Daum

  • Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 Disease severity and nonataxia symptoms

    T Schmitz-Hübsch;M Coudert;Peter Bauer;P Giunti

  • Long-term disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: a longitudinal cohort study

    Heike Jacobi;Sophie Tezenas du Montcel;Peter Bauer;Paola Giunti

  • Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration.

    K. Rabe;O. Livne;E. R. Gizewski;V. Aurich

  • The natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6: a 2-year follow-up study

    H. Jacobi;P. Bauer;P. Giunti;R. Labrum

  • Cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation.

    Opher Donchin;Opher Donchin;Klaus F. Rabe;Jörn Diedrichsen;Jörn Diedrichsen;Níall Lally

  • Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: A study in 64 ataxia patients

    Anja Weyer;Michael Abele;Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch;Beate Schoch

  • Consensus Paper: Management of Degenerative Cerebellar Disorders

    W. Ilg;A. J. Bastian;S. Boesch;R. G. Burciu

  • Visualization, quantification and correlation of brain atrophy with clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 3 and 6.

    Jörg B. Schulz;Jörg B. Schulz;Johannes Borkert;Stefanie Wolf;Stefanie Wolf;Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch

  • The involvement of the human cerebellum in eyeblink conditioning.

    M. Gerwig;F. P. Kolb;D. Timmann

  • Functional localization in the human cerebellum based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 90 patients.

    B. Schoch;A. Dimitrova;E. R. Gizewski;Dagmar Timmann

  • Responsiveness of different rating instruments in spinocerebellar ataxia patients.

    T Schmitz-Hübsch;R Fimmers;M Rakowicz;R Rola

  • Biological and clinical characteristics of individuals at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 in the longitudinal RISCA study: analysis of baseline data

    Heike Jacobi;Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz;Sophie Tezenas du Montcel;Peter Bauer

  • Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs (INAS): validation of a new clinical assessment instrument.

    H. Jacobi;M. Rakowicz;R. Rola;R. Fancellu

  • Functional recovery of children and adolescents after cerebellar tumour resection.

    Jiirgen Konczak;Beate Schoch;Albena Dimitrova;Elke Gizewski

Frequent Co-Authors

Elke R. Gizewski
Elke R. Gizewski Innsbruck Medical University
Ludger Schöls
Ludger Schöls University of Tübingen
Matthias Maschke
Matthias Maschke University of Duisburg-Essen
Alexandra Durr
Alexandra Durr Sorbonne University
Joachim Hermsdörfer
Joachim Hermsdörfer Technical University of Munich
Michael Forsting
Michael Forsting University of Duisburg-Essen
Opher Donchin
Opher Donchin Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Massimo Pandolfo
Massimo Pandolfo McGill University
Rebecca Schüle
Rebecca Schüle University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dagmar Timmann

Trending Scientists