World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
75
Citations
17693
World Ranking
2043
National Ranking
64

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 288 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily addresses various aspects of neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, with significant contributions in genetics and molecular biology.

The main fields of study covered in their research include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

The subfields within these disciplines where they have demonstrated considerable focus are:

  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

The central topics of their work reflect a concentration on neurodegenerative and hereditary neurological disorders, including:

  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Van de Warrenburg has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Matthis Synofzik
  • Lüdger Schöls
  • Thomas Klockgether
  • Dagmar Timmann
  • Jennifer Faber

Their publishing record features a significant number of papers in various prominent journals. Common venues for their research publications include:

  • Movement Disorders
  • Journal of Neurology
  • The Cerebellum
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their work:

  • Natural History, Phenotypic Spectrum, and Discriminative Features of Multisystemic RFC1 Disease, 2021, Neurology
  • Nomenclature of Genetic Movement Disorders: Recommendations of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force - An Update, 2022, Movement Disorders
  • How to proceed after "negative" exome: A review on genetic diagnostics, limitations, challenges, and emerging new multiomics techniques, 2022, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
  • The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale reveals early neuropsychological deficits in SCA3 patients, 2021, Journal of Neurology
  • Genome-wide Association and Meta-analysis of Age at Onset in Parkinson Disease, 2022, Neurology

Best Publications

  • Neurological gait disorders in elderly people: clinical approach and classification

    Anke H Snijders;Bart P van de Warrenburg;Nir Giladi;Bastiaan R Bloem

  • Postural deformities in Parkinson's disease

    Karen M Doherty;Bart P van de Warrenburg;Maria Cecilia Peralta;Laura Silveira-Moriyama

  • How might physical activity benefit patients with Parkinson disease

    Arlène D. Speelman;Bart P. van de Warrenburg;Marlies van Nimwegen;Giselle M. Petzinger

  • Nomenclature of genetic movement disorders: Recommendations of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society task force

    Connie Marras;Anthony Lang;Bart P. van de Warrenburg;Carolyn M. Sue

  • Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 Disease severity and nonataxia symptoms

    T Schmitz-Hübsch;M Coudert;Peter Bauer;P Giunti

  • Long-term disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: a longitudinal cohort study

    Heike Jacobi;Sophie Tezenas du Montcel;Peter Bauer;Paola Giunti

  • Visualization, quantification and correlation of brain atrophy with clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 3 and 6.

    Jörg B. Schulz;Jörg B. Schulz;Johannes Borkert;Stefanie Wolf;Stefanie Wolf;Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch

  • Angiogenin variants in Parkinson disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Michael A. Van Es;Helenius J. Schelhaas;Paul W J Van Vught;Nicola Ticozzi;Nicola Ticozzi

  • The clinical approach to movement disorders.

    Wilson F. Abdo;Bart P. C. van de Warrenburg;David J. Burn;Niall P. Quinn

  • Network localization of cervical dystonia based on causal brain lesions.

    Daniel T Corp;Daniel T Corp;Juho Joutsa;R Ryan Darby;R Ryan Darby;Cathérine C S Delnooz

  • REEP1 mutation spectrum and genotype/phenotype correlation in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 31.

    Christian Beetz;Rebecca Schüle;Tine Deconinck;Khanh Nhat Tran-Viet

  • Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients

    Tanja T. Schmitz-Hübsch;Sophie Tezenas S.T. du Montcel;Laszlo L. Baliko;Sylvia S. Boesch

  • Modulation of the age at onset in spinocerebellar ataxia by CAG tracts in various genes

    Sophie Tezenas Du Montcel;Sophie Tezenas Du Montcel;Alexandra Durr;Peter Bauer;Karla P. Figueroa

  • Mutations in DDHD2, encoding an intracellular phospholipase A(1), cause a recessive form of complex hereditary spastic paraplegia.

    Janneke H.M. Schuurs-Hoeijmakers;Michael T. Geraghty;Erik-Jan Kamsteeg;Salma Ben-Salem

  • Early symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6

    Christoph Globas;Sophie Tezenas du Montcel;Laslo Baliko;Syliva Boesch

  • Recessive mutations in POLR1C cause a leukodystrophy by impairing biogenesis of RNA polymerase III

    Isabelle Thiffault;Isabelle Thiffault;Isabelle Thiffault;Nicole I. Wolf;Diane Forget;Kether Guerrero

  • ARSACS in the Dutch population: a frequent cause of early-onset cerebellar ataxia

    Sascha Vermeer;Rowdy P. P. Meijer;Benjamin J. Pijl;Janneke Timmermans

  • Movement disorders in spinocerebellar ataxias

    Judith van Gaalen;Paola Giunti;Bart P. van de Warrenburg

  • Mutations in VPS13D lead to a new recessive ataxia with spasticity and mitochondrial defects

    Eunju Seong;Ryan Insolera;Marija Dulovic;Erik Jan Kamsteeg

  • Genotype-specific patterns of atrophy progression are more sensitive than clinical decline in SCA1, SCA3 and SCA6

    Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz;Ana Sofia Costa;Shahram Mirzazade;Shahram Mirzazade;Anna Lehmann;Anna Lehmann

  • Genomewide association study of Parkinson's disease clinical biomarkers in 12 longitudinal patients' cohorts

    Hirotaka Iwaki;Cornelis Blauwendraat;Hampton L. Leonard;Jonggeol J. Kim

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations in spastic paraplegia type 7: a study in a large Dutch cohort.

    Koen L. I. van Gassen;Charlotte D. C. C. van der Heijden;Susanne T. de Bot;Wilfred F. A. den Dunnen

  • Mutations in potassium channel kcnd3 cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 19.

    Anna Duarri;Justyna Jezierska;Michiel Fokkens;Michel Meijer

  • Early symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6

    L. Schöls;C. Globas;T. Schmitz-Hübsch;D. Timmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludger Schöls
Ludger Schöls University of Tübingen
Thomas Klockgether
Thomas Klockgether German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Alexandra Durr
Alexandra Durr Sorbonne University
Dagmar Timmann
Dagmar Timmann University of Duisburg-Essen
Alexis Brice
Alexis Brice Institut du Cerveau
Bastiaan R. Bloem
Bastiaan R. Bloem Radboud University
Rebecca Schüle
Rebecca Schüle University of Tübingen
Hans Scheffer
Hans Scheffer Radboud University
Paola Giunti
Paola Giunti University College London
Alessandro Filla
Alessandro Filla University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in neuroscience often pursue related fields, such as counseling and psychology, to broaden their career opportunities. Today, there are many cacrep accredited programs available online, providing a flexible path for those seeking recognized credentials in counseling.

For those aiming for a counseling career, earning an online master's in counseling can open doors to roles in mental health, education, and community services. Another popular path is marriage and family therapy. Comprehensive online mft programs allow candidates to specialize and meet the growing demand for family support services.

Cost remains a key concern when choosing a graduate program. Prospective students should compare tuition rates, especially for online psychology options. To better understand affordability, explore how much does masters in psychology cost to find a program that suits your financial plan.

With a background in neuroscience, these related online degrees can support diverse career pathways, expanding your impact in healthcare, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg

Trending Scientists