World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 75 2043 1865 64 60 288 17693

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 47 of the 354 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 20 publications
1998 2025

354 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 5
2005 7
2006 8
2007 6
2008 10
2009 5
2010 13
2011 13
2012 25
2013 24
2014 15
2015 14
2016 10
2017 16
2018 11
2019 26
2020 19
2021 38
2022 16
2023 21
2024 27
2025 20
Total 354
Download as CSV

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 288–297 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 288 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116 288
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189 75
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily addresses various aspects of neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, with significant contributions in genetics and molecular biology.

The main fields of study covered in their research include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

The subfields within these disciplines where they have demonstrated considerable focus are:

  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

The central topics of their work reflect a concentration on neurodegenerative and hereditary neurological disorders, including:

  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Van de Warrenburg has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Matthis Synofzik
  • Lüdger Schöls
  • Thomas Klockgether
  • Dagmar Timmann
  • Jennifer Faber

Their publishing record features a significant number of papers in various prominent journals. Common venues for their research publications include:

  • Movement Disorders
  • Journal of Neurology
  • The Cerebellum
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their work:

  • Natural History, Phenotypic Spectrum, and Discriminative Features of Multisystemic RFC1 Disease, 2021, Neurology
  • Nomenclature of Genetic Movement Disorders: Recommendations of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force - An Update, 2022, Movement Disorders
  • How to proceed after "negative" exome: A review on genetic diagnostics, limitations, challenges, and emerging new multiomics techniques, 2022, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
  • The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale reveals early neuropsychological deficits in SCA3 patients, 2021, Journal of Neurology
  • Genome-wide Association and Meta-analysis of Age at Onset in Parkinson Disease, 2022, Neurology

Best Publications

  • Neurological gait disorders in elderly people: clinical approach and classification

    Anke H Snijders;Bart P van de Warrenburg;Nir Giladi;Bastiaan R Bloem

  • Postural deformities in Parkinson's disease

    Karen M Doherty;Bart P van de Warrenburg;Maria Cecilia Peralta;Laura Silveira-Moriyama

  • How might physical activity benefit patients with Parkinson disease

    Arlène D. Speelman;Bart P. van de Warrenburg;Marlies van Nimwegen;Giselle M. Petzinger

  • Nomenclature of genetic movement disorders: Recommendations of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society task force

    Connie Marras;Anthony Lang;Bart P. van de Warrenburg;Carolyn M. Sue

  • Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 Disease severity and nonataxia symptoms

    T Schmitz-Hübsch;M Coudert;Peter Bauer;P Giunti

  • Long-term disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: a longitudinal cohort study

    Heike Jacobi;Sophie Tezenas du Montcel;Peter Bauer;Paola Giunti

  • Visualization, quantification and correlation of brain atrophy with clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 3 and 6.

    Jörg B. Schulz;Jörg B. Schulz;Johannes Borkert;Stefanie Wolf;Stefanie Wolf;Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch

  • Angiogenin variants in Parkinson disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Michael A. Van Es;Helenius J. Schelhaas;Paul W J Van Vught;Nicola Ticozzi;Nicola Ticozzi

  • The clinical approach to movement disorders.

    Wilson F. Abdo;Bart P. C. van de Warrenburg;David J. Burn;Niall P. Quinn

  • Network localization of cervical dystonia based on causal brain lesions.

    Daniel T Corp;Daniel T Corp;Juho Joutsa;R Ryan Darby;R Ryan Darby;Cathérine C S Delnooz

  • REEP1 mutation spectrum and genotype/phenotype correlation in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 31.

    Christian Beetz;Rebecca Schüle;Tine Deconinck;Khanh Nhat Tran-Viet

  • Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients

    Tanja T. Schmitz-Hübsch;Sophie Tezenas S.T. du Montcel;Laszlo L. Baliko;Sylvia S. Boesch

  • Modulation of the age at onset in spinocerebellar ataxia by CAG tracts in various genes

    Sophie Tezenas Du Montcel;Sophie Tezenas Du Montcel;Alexandra Durr;Peter Bauer;Karla P. Figueroa

  • Mutations in DDHD2, encoding an intracellular phospholipase A(1), cause a recessive form of complex hereditary spastic paraplegia.

    Janneke H.M. Schuurs-Hoeijmakers;Michael T. Geraghty;Erik-Jan Kamsteeg;Salma Ben-Salem

  • Early symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6

    Christoph Globas;Sophie Tezenas du Montcel;Laslo Baliko;Syliva Boesch

  • Recessive mutations in POLR1C cause a leukodystrophy by impairing biogenesis of RNA polymerase III

    Isabelle Thiffault;Isabelle Thiffault;Isabelle Thiffault;Nicole I. Wolf;Diane Forget;Kether Guerrero

  • ARSACS in the Dutch population: a frequent cause of early-onset cerebellar ataxia

    Sascha Vermeer;Rowdy P. P. Meijer;Benjamin J. Pijl;Janneke Timmermans

  • Movement disorders in spinocerebellar ataxias

    Judith van Gaalen;Paola Giunti;Bart P. van de Warrenburg

  • Mutations in VPS13D lead to a new recessive ataxia with spasticity and mitochondrial defects

    Eunju Seong;Ryan Insolera;Marija Dulovic;Erik Jan Kamsteeg

  • Genotype-specific patterns of atrophy progression are more sensitive than clinical decline in SCA1, SCA3 and SCA6

    Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz;Ana Sofia Costa;Shahram Mirzazade;Shahram Mirzazade;Anna Lehmann;Anna Lehmann

  • Genomewide association study of Parkinson's disease clinical biomarkers in 12 longitudinal patients' cohorts

    Hirotaka Iwaki;Cornelis Blauwendraat;Hampton L. Leonard;Jonggeol J. Kim

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations in spastic paraplegia type 7: a study in a large Dutch cohort.

    Koen L. I. van Gassen;Charlotte D. C. C. van der Heijden;Susanne T. de Bot;Wilfred F. A. den Dunnen

  • Mutations in potassium channel kcnd3 cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 19.

    Anna Duarri;Justyna Jezierska;Michiel Fokkens;Michel Meijer

  • Early symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6

    L. Schöls;C. Globas;T. Schmitz-Hübsch;D. Timmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludger Schöls
Ludger Schöls University of Tübingen
Thomas Klockgether
Thomas Klockgether German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Alexandra Durr
Alexandra Durr Sorbonne University
Dagmar Timmann
Dagmar Timmann University of Duisburg-Essen
Alexis Brice
Alexis Brice Institut du Cerveau
Bastiaan R. Bloem
Bastiaan R. Bloem Radboud University
Rebecca Schüle
Rebecca Schüle University of Tübingen
Hans Scheffer
Hans Scheffer Radboud University
Paola Giunti
Paola Giunti University College London
Alessandro Filla
Alessandro Filla University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in neuroscience often pursue related fields, such as counseling and psychology, to broaden their career opportunities. Today, there are many cacrep accredited programs available online, providing a flexible path for those seeking recognized credentials in counseling.

For those aiming for a counseling career, earning an online master's in counseling can open doors to roles in mental health, education, and community services. Another popular path is marriage and family therapy. Comprehensive online mft programs allow candidates to specialize and meet the growing demand for family support services.

Cost remains a key concern when choosing a graduate program. Prospective students should compare tuition rates, especially for online psychology options. To better understand affordability, explore how much does masters in psychology cost to find a program that suits your financial plan.

With a background in neuroscience, these related online degrees can support diverse career pathways, expanding your impact in healthcare, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles