World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
128
Citations
82582
World Ranking
2653
National Ranking
274

Henry J McQuay publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry J McQuay sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 460 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Henry J McQuay D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry J McQuay sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henry J McQuay is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. The academic profile reflects an association with a prominent research institution, although specific fields of study and detailed research topics are not provided.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues linked to Henry J McQuay in the available data. Similarly, there are no listed book publications or specified main and subfields of study.

No awards have been documented in the source information. The absence of data on publication topics, collaborative networks, and academic honors limits the extent of detail regarding the scope and impact of their scholarly activity.

This profile provides a concise view based on the available data points, emphasizing current affiliation without additional detailed metrics or outputs.

Best Publications

  • Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?

    A. R. Jadad;R. A. Moore;D. Carroll;C. Jenkinson

  • Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations

    Robert H. Dworkin;Dennis C. Turk;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Dorcas Beaton

  • The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?

    Sally L Collins;R.Andrew Moore;Henry J McQuay

  • Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment:: an evidence based proposal.

    N.B. Finnerup;Marit Otto;H.J. McQuay;T.S. Jensen

  • Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety

    Eija Kalso;Jayne E. Edwards;R. Andrew Moore;Henry J. McQuay

  • A systematic review of antidepressants in neuropathic pain

    H. J. McQuay;M. Tramér;B. A. Nye;D. Carroll

  • Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain : the EAPC recommendations

    G W Hanks;F de Conno;N Cherny;M Hanna

  • Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: a systematic review.

    Henry McQuay;Dawn Carroll;Alejandro R Jadad;Philip Wiffen

  • Cannabinoids for control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic review.

    Martin R Tramèr;Dawn Carroll;Fiona A Campbell;D John M Reynolds

  • Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

    M. R. Tramer;D. J. M. Reynolds;R. A. Moore;H. J. Mcquay

  • Strategies to Manage the Adverse Effects of Oral Morphine: An Evidence-Based Report

    Nathan Cherny;Carla Ripamonti;Jose Pereira;Carol Davis

  • Pregabalin for acute and chronic pain in adults

    R Andrew Moore;Sebastian Straube;Philip J Wiffen;Sheena Derry

  • Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults

    R.A. Moore;P.J. Wiffen;S. Derry;H.J. McQuay

  • Anticonvulsant Drugs for Acute and Chronic Pain

    Philip J Wiffen;Sally Collins;Henry J McQuay;Dawn Carroll

  • Quantitive systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

    R A Moore;M R Tramèr;D Carroll;P J Wiffen

  • An Evidence-Based Resource for Pain Relief

    H. J. McQuay;R. A. Moore

  • Are cannabinoids an effective and safe treatment option in the management of pain? A qualitative systematic review

    Fiona A Campbell;Martin R Tramèr;Dawn Carroll;D John M Reynolds

  • Systematic review of topical capsaicin for the treatment of chronic pain

    Lorna Mason;R Andrew Moore;Sheena Derry;Jayne E Edwards

  • Prevalence of anaemia in older persons: systematic review

    Helen Gaskell;Sheena Derry;R Andrew Moore;Henry J McQuay

  • Efficacy, dose-response, and safety of ondansetron in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

    Martin R. Tramer;D. John M. Reynolds;R. Andrew Moore;Henry J. McQuay

Frequent Co-Authors

R Andrew Moore
R Andrew Moore University of Oxford
Sheena Derry
Sheena Derry University of Oxford
Anthony H. Dickenson
Anthony H. Dickenson University College London
Martin R. Tramèr
Martin R. Tramèr University of Geneva
Eija Kalso
Eija Kalso University of Helsinki
Christopher Eccleston
Christopher Eccleston University of Bath
Sebastiano Mercadante
Sebastiano Mercadante La Maddalena Cancer Center
Petra Schweinhardt
Petra Schweinhardt University of Zurich
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Jonathan C W Brooks
Jonathan C W Brooks University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees in healthcare can open more flexible and accelerated career paths, especially for those interested in nursing. Many working nurses choose rn to bsn online no clinicals programs to advance their qualifications without the need for additional on-site clinical hours.

Another option for advancing your education is through accelerated dnp programs, which are designed to fast-track your path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice. Some schools even offer a dnp program without clinical hours, making it more accessible for professionals balancing work and study.

If you are just starting out in the nursing field, you might be wondering what is the fastest way to become an lpn. Online fast-track LPN programs offer a quicker route to entering the workforce. With these flexible degree options, a wide range of healthcare careers becomes achievable, fitting diverse schedules and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Henry J McQuay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles