World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher Eccleston

Christopher Eccleston

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
109
Citations
47564
World Ranking
556
National Ranking
70

Christopher Eccleston publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Eccleston sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 467 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Christopher Eccleston D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Eccleston sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher Eccleston is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a substantial body of work spread across subfields such as Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery, and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

The scientist's main research topics include musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, pediatric pain management techniques, pain management and placebo effect, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, cannabis and cannabinoid research, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, and infant development and preterm care.

Christopher Eccleston has published extensively in several notable venues. Their most frequent publication platforms include:

  • Pain
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Journal of Pain
  • The Lancet
  • Arthritis Care & Research

Some recent papers authored by Eccleston include:

  • Managing patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 outbreak: considerations for the rapid introduction of remotely supported (eHealth) pain management services, 2020, Pain
  • Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission, 2020, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Frequent collaborators in their research include Emma Fisher, Andrew Moore, Amanda C de C Williams, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, and Edmund Keogh.

Best Publications

  • Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain.

    Christopher Eccleston;G Crombez

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache

    Stephen Morley;Christopher Eccleston;Amanda Williams

  • Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults

    Amanda C de C Williams;Christopher Eccleston;Stephen Morley

  • Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method

    Lance M McCracken;Kevin E Vowles;Christopher Eccleston

  • Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: the next generation.

    Geert Crombez;Christopher Eccleston;Stefaan Van Damme;Johan W S Vlaeyen;Johan W S Vlaeyen

  • Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

    Christopher Eccleston;Tonya M Palermo;Amanda C de C Williams;Amy Lewandowski

  • Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations

    Patrick J. McGrath;Gary A. Walco;Dennis C. Turk;Robert H. Dworkin

  • Coping or acceptance: What to do about chronic pain?

    Lance M McCracken;Chris Eccleston

  • The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation

    Geert Crombez;Patricia Bijttebier;Chris Eccleston;Tamara Mascagni

  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Therapies for Children With Chronic Pain

    Emma Fisher;Lauren Heathcote;Tonya M. Palermo;Amanda C de C Williams

  • Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase.

    Lance M. McCracken;Kevin E. Vowles;Christopher Eccleston

  • A neurocognitive model of attention to pain: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence

    Valéry Legrain;Stefaan Van Damme;Christopher Eccleston;Karen D. Davis

  • Randomized controlled trials of psychological therapies for management of chronic pain in children and adolescents: an updated meta-analytic review.

    Tonya M. Palermo;Christopher Eccleston;Amy S. Lewandowski;Amanda C de C. Williams

  • Adolescent chronic pain: patterns and predictors of emotional distress in adolescents with chronic pain and their parents

    Christopher Eccleston;Geert Crombez;Anna Scotford;Anna Scotford;Jacqui Clinch;Jacqui Clinch

  • When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference

    Geert Crombez;Chris Eccleston;Frank Baeyens;Paul Eelen

  • A prospective study of acceptance of pain and patient functioning with chronic pain

    Lance M. McCracken;Christopher Eccleston

  • Managing patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 outbreak: considerations for the rapid introduction of remotely supported (eHealth) pain management services.

    Christopher Eccleston;Fiona M. Blyth;Blake F. Dear;Emma A. Fisher

  • Acceptance and change in the context of chronic pain

    Lance M McCracken;James W Carson;Christopher Eccleston;Francis J Keefe

  • Hypervigilance to pain: An experimental and clinical analysis

    Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme;Christopher Eccleston

  • Smartphone applications for pain management.

    Benjamin A Rosser;Christopher Eccleston

Frequent Co-Authors

Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Edmund Keogh
Edmund Keogh University of Bath
Lance M. McCracken
Lance M. McCracken Uppsala University
Kevin E. Vowles
Kevin E. Vowles Queen's University Belfast
Liesbet Goubert
Liesbet Goubert Ghent University
Stefaan Van Damme
Stefaan Van Damme Ghent University
Tonya M. Palermo
Tonya M. Palermo University of Washington
Stephen Morley
Stephen Morley University of Leeds
Tine Vervoort
Tine Vervoort Ghent University
Amanda C. de C. Williams
Amanda C. de C. Williams University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Christopher Eccleston

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles