World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lance M. McCracken

Lance M. McCracken

Award Badge
Psychology
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 89 996 871 10 10 375 31421

Lance M. McCracken publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lance M. McCracken between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lance M. McCracken published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2025. 55 of the 473 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2025. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 33 publications
1990 2025

473 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lance M. McCracken: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 4
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 5
2000 2
2001 4
2002 6
2003 4
2004 12
2005 12
2006 10
2007 14
2008 16
2009 10
2010 13
2011 20
2012 15
2013 14
2014 23
2015 19
2016 32
2017 24
2018 31
2019 16
2020 17
2021 30
2022 20
2023 27
2024 22
2025 33
Total 473
Download as CSV

Lance M. McCracken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance M. McCracken sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 371–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 375 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63 375
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lance M. McCracken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance M. McCracken sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 89
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Lance M. McCracken is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden. Their research primarily covers intersections of medicine and psychology, with a strong focus on clinical psychology as well as pharmacology and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's published works address various topics within these fields, including musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, mindfulness and compassion interventions, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, pain management and placebo effect, complementary and alternative medicine studies, COVID-19 and mental health, and healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • European Journal of Pain
  • Journal of Pain
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Several notable papers authored by Lance M. McCracken are:

  • "Psychological impact of COVID-19 in the Swedish population: Depression, anxiety, and insomnia and their associations to risk and vulnerability factors," 2020, European Psychiatry
  • "The role of psychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19: Associations with depression, anxiety, and insomnia," 2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • "New generation psychological treatments in chronic pain," 2022, BMJ

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Monica Buhrman
  • Whitney Scott
  • Juan V. Luciano
  • Christopher D. Graham
  • Felicia Sundström

Best Publications

  • Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method

    Lance M McCracken;Kevin E Vowles;Christopher Eccleston

  • The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale: development and validation of a scale to measure fear of pain.

    Lance M. McCracken;Claudia Zayfert;Richard T. Gross

  • Learning to live with the pain: acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain

    Lance M McCracken

  • Coping or acceptance: What to do about chronic pain?

    Lance M McCracken;Chris Eccleston

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness for chronic pain: model, process, and progress.

    Lance M. McCracken;Kevin E. Vowles

  • A short version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20): preliminary development and validity.

    Lance M McCracken;Lara Dhingra

  • Acceptance and values-based action in chronic pain: A study of treatment effectiveness and process.

    Kevin E. Vowles;Lance M. McCracken

  • Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase.

    Lance M. McCracken;Kevin E. Vowles;Christopher Eccleston

  • Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain: outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process.

    Lance M. McCracken;Dennis C. Turk

  • Attention to pain in persons with chronic pain: A behavioral approach

    Lance M. McCracken

  • The Psychological Flexibility Model: A Basis for Integration and Progress in Psychological Approaches to Chronic Pain Management

    Lance M. McCracken;Stephen Morley

  • A prospective study of acceptance of pain and patient functioning with chronic pain

    Lance M. McCracken;Christopher Eccleston

  • Acceptance and change in the context of chronic pain

    Lance M McCracken;James W Carson;Christopher Eccleston;Francis J Keefe

  • The role of mindfulness in a contextual cognitive-behavioral analysis of chronic pain-related suffering and disability

    Lance M. McCracken;Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert;Kevin E. Vowles

  • Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

    Lance M. McCracken;Olga Gutiérrez-Martínez

  • The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain.

    Lance M. McCracken;Su-Yin Yang;Su-Yin Yang

  • Prediction of pain in patients with chronic low back pain: effects of inaccurate prediction and pain-related anxiety.

    Lance M. McCracken;Richard T. Gross;P.J. Sorg;Theresa A. Edmands

  • ‘Postconcussive’ symptoms in persons with chronic pain

    Grant L. Iverson;Lance M. McCracken

  • Processes of change in treatment for chronic pain: The contributions of pain, acceptance, and catastrophizing

    Kevin E. Vowles;Lance M. McCracken;Christopher Eccleston

  • Assessing nicotine dependence: a comparison of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample.

    Payne Tj;Smith Po;McCracken Lm;McSherry Wc

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Eccleston
Christopher Eccleston University of Bath
Kevin E. Vowles
Kevin E. Vowles Queen's University Belfast
Sam Norton
Sam Norton King's College London
Rona Moss-Morris
Rona Moss-Morris King's College London
Sean Perrin
Sean Perrin Lund University
Grant L. Iverson
Grant L. Iverson Harvard University
Juan V. Luciano
Juan V. Luciano Autonomous University of Barcelona
Joseph Chilcot
Joseph Chilcot King's College London
Albert Feliu-Soler
Albert Feliu-Soler Autonomous University of Barcelona
Edmund Keogh
Edmund Keogh University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to many in-demand career paths, many of which can be accessed through flexible online programs. Among these, becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP) is a rewarding option for those interested in helping individuals with communication disorders. Requirements for entering this field vary by state, and it's important to understand local certification steps.

For example, students aiming to practice in Mississippi should review the Mississippi slp certification requirements to ensure they meet educational and licensing standards. In Missouri, there are specific slp requirements in Missouri that outline coursework, clinical hours, and examination procedures.

If you’re considering working in the western U.S., see what's involved in becoming a speech therapist in Montana, where state licensure is required following graduate education and clinical experience. Likewise, understanding the process for becoming a speech therapist in Nebraska is key for those planning a career in that region.

Whether you choose clinical work, counseling, education, or therapy, earning a Psychology degree online can help you achieve your career goals while offering the flexibility you need to balance other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Lance M. McCracken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles