World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6882 6414 692 660 142 9819

Tamar Pincus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tamar Pincus between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tamar Pincus published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2016. 23 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2016. 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 11 publications
1993 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tamar Pincus: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 3
2005 3
2006 9
2007 6
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 8
2012 9
2013 14
2014 9
2015 7
2016 24
2017 11
2018 7
2019 8
2020 7
2021 13
2022 10
2023 16
2024 12
2025 11
Total 227
Download as CSV

Tamar Pincus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Pincus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 142
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tamar Pincus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Pincus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tamar Pincus is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across subfields including Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their body of work extensively addresses topics related to pain management and rehabilitation. Main research interests include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Among Tamar Pincus's recent papers are:

  • "Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis," published in 2023 by Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Self-management for chronic widespread pain including fibromyalgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis," published in 2021 by PLoS ONE
  • "Diagnostic uncertainty in pediatric chronic pain: nature, prevalence, and consequences," published in 2020 by PAIN Reports
  • "The establishment, maintenance, and adaptation of high- and low-impact chronic pain: a framework for biopsychosocial pain research," published in 2023 by Pain
  • "Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis," published in 2024 by Health Technology Assessment

Frequent collaborators include Noa Ben Ami, Martin Underwood, Christian Mallen, Hollie Birkinshaw, and Harbinder Sandhu.

Pincus's research findings have appeared regularly in several publication venues with multiple contributions to:

  • BMJ Open
  • Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Pain
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Best Publications

  • A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.

    Tamar Pincus;A. Kim Burton;Steven Vogel;Andy P. Field

  • Cognitive-processing bias in chronic pain: a review and integration.

    Tamar Pincus;Stephen Morley

  • A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives

    Robert J. Froud;Robert J. Froud;Sue Patterson;Sandra Eldridge;Clive Seale

  • Fear avoidance and prognosis in back pain: a systematic review and synthesis of current evidence.

    Tamar Pincus;Steven Vogel;A. Kim Burton;Rita Santos

  • Twenty-five years with the biopsychosocial model of low back pain-is it time to celebrate? A report from the twelfth international forum for primary care research on low back pain.

    Tamar Pincus;Peter Kent;Gert Bronfort;Gert Bronfort;Patrick Loisel;Patrick Loisel

  • The Fear Avoidance Model Disentangled: Improving the Clinical Utility of the Fear Avoidance Model

    Tamar Pincus;Rob J.E.M. Smeets;Maureen J. Simmonds;Michael J.L. Sullivan

  • PREVALENCE OF SELF-REPORTED DEPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

    T. Pincus;J. Griffith;S. Pearce;D. Isenberg

  • Cognitive and affective reassurance and patient outcomes in primary care: A systematic review

    Tamar Pincus;Nicola Holt;Steven Vogel;Martin Underwood

  • Chronic musculoskeletal pain rarely presents in a single body site: results from a UK population study

    D. Carnes;S. Parsons;D. Ashby;A. Breen

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychosocial factors in low back pain: directions for the future.

    Tamar Pincus;Johan W S Vlaeyen;Nick A S Kendall;Michael R Von Korff

  • Prevalence and comparative troublesomeness by age of musculoskeletal pain in different body locations

    Suzanne Parsons;A. Breen;N. E. Foster;L. Letley

  • Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review

    Jill A Hayden;Maria N Wilson;Richard D Riley;Ross Iles

  • Effective delivery styles and content for self-management interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic literature review.

    Dawn Carnes;Kate E. Homer;Clare L. Miles;Tamar Pincus

  • Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs

    Clare L Miles;Tamar Pincus;Dawn Carnes;Kate E Homer

  • Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study

    Tamar Pincus;Clare Miles;Robert J. Froud;Martin Underwood

  • Psychological factors and treatment opportunities in low back pain

    Tamar Pincus;Lance M. McCracken

  • Measuring Pain Self-efficacy

    Clare L. Miles;Tamar Pincus;Dawn Carnes;Stephanie J.C. Taylor

  • Do chronic pain patients 'Stroop' on pain stimuli ?

    Tamar Pincus;Lindsay Fraser;Shirley Pearce

  • Non-pharmacological self-management for people living with migraine or tension-type headache: a systematic review including analysis of intervention components

    Katrin Probyn;Hannah Bowers;Dipesh Mistry;Fiona Caldwell

  • A review and proposal for a core set of factors for prospective cohorts in low back pain: A consensus statement

    Tamar Pincus;Rita Santos;Alan C. Breen;A. Kim Burton

  • Models and measurements of depression in chronic pain

    Tamar Pincus;Amanda Williams

  • The influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

    Suzanne Parsons;Geoffrey Harding;Alan Breen;Nadine Foster

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadine E. Foster
Nadine E. Foster University of Queensland
Andy P. Field
Andy P. Field University of Sussex
Melanie Noel
Melanie Noel University of Calgary
Stephen Morley
Stephen Morley University of Leeds
Lance M. McCracken
Lance M. McCracken Uppsala University
Keith Owen Yeates
Keith Owen Yeates University of Calgary
Clive Seale
Clive Seale Brunel University London
David A. Isenberg
David A. Isenberg University College London
Caroline J. Doré
Caroline J. Doré University College London
Amanda C. de C. Williams
Amanda C. de C. Williams University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students supplement or diversify their psychology studies with programs in social work, counseling, or behavioral sciences. Online learning makes it much easier to tailor your education and find programs that meet your interests and location-specific needs.

For example, if you’re interested in social work, you might want to explore the popular social work degrees in Duluth or see what’s available among the popular social work degrees in North Carolina. If high program quality matters most, you can discover the best-ranked social work degree programs in Pittsburgh. For those looking to maximize their investment, the best value online bsw programs in Ohio offer affordable options that align well with psychology backgrounds.

Choosing an online degree in social work or related fields can help prepare you for roles in mental health, clinical practice, case management, research, or community outreach. Today’s flexible options make advancing your career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Tamar Pincus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles