World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
33113
World Ranking
10474
National Ranking
316

G. Lorimer Moseley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Lorimer Moseley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 362 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

G. Lorimer Moseley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Lorimer Moseley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

G. Lorimer Moseley is affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their research focuses primarily in the field of Medicine, with a significant portion of work spanning several specialized subfields including Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

Their scholarly output includes extensive investigation into topics related to pain and rehabilitation. The main topics of their research encompass:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Policy Implementation Science

Moseley has published in various academic venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • Journal of Pain
  • Pain
  • PeerJ
  • Frontiers in Pain Research
  • European Journal of Pain

A selection of recent papers authored or co-authored by Moseley includes:

  • Low back pain and the social determinants of health: a systematic review and narrative synthesis, 2020, Pain
  • The Valencia consensus-based adaptation of the IASP complex regional pain syndrome diagnostic criteria, 2021, Pain
  • Considerations for using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to assess cognitive flexibility, 2021, Behavior Research Methods
  • Effect of Graded Sensorimotor Retraining on Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain, 2022, JAMA
  • What do patients value learning about pain? A mixed-methods survey on the relevance of target concepts after pain science education, 2021, Pain

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Emma L. Karran
  • Tasha R. Stanton
  • Hayley B. Leake
  • Aidan G. Cashin
  • James H. McAuley

Best Publications

  • Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: effect and possible mechanisms

    Paul W. Hodges;G.Lorimer Moseley

  • Clinical features and pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome

    Johan Marinus;G Lorimer Moseley;G Lorimer Moseley;Frank Birklein;Ralf Baron

  • Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future

    G. Lorimer Moseley;G. Lorimer Moseley;David S. Butler

  • Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain A randomized controlled trial

    G. Lorimer Moseley

  • A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain.

    G Lorimer Moseley;Michael K Nicholas;Paul W Hodges

  • Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart

    G. Lorimer Moseley;Nick Olthof;Annemeike Venema;Sanneke Don

  • Experimental muscle pain changes feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles

    Paul W. Hodges;Paul W. Hodges;G. Lorimer Moseley;Anna Gabrielsson;Simon C. Gandevia

  • Targeting cortical representations in the treatment of chronic pain: A review.

    G. Lorimer Moseley;Herta Flor

  • Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements

    G Lorimer Moseley;Paul W Hodges;Simon C Gandevia

  • Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical 'body matrix'.

    G. Lorimer Moseley;Alberto Gallace;Charles Spence

  • Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain

    G.Lorimer Moseley

  • Why do some patients keep hurting their back? Evidence of ongoing back muscle dysfunction during remission from recurrent back pain

    David MacDonald;G. Lorimer Moseley;Paul W. Hodges

  • The lumbar multifidus: Does the evidence support clinical beliefs?

    David A. MacDonald;G. Lorimer Moseley;Paul W. Hodges

  • I can't find it! Distorted body image and tactile dysfunction in patients with chronic back pain.

    G. Lorimer Moseley

  • Cortical changes in chronic low back pain: Current state of the art and implications for clinical practice

    Benedict Martin Wand;Luke Parkitny;Neil Edward O’Connell;Hannu Luomajoki

  • Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy

    Ebonie Rio;Dawson Kidgell;Craig Purdam;Jamie Gaida;Jamie Gaida

  • Tactile discrimination, but not tactile stimulation alone, reduces chronic limb pain

    G. Lorimer Moseley;Nadia M. Zalucki;Nadia M. Zalucki;Katja Wiech

  • Exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A biopsychosocial approach

    John Booth;G. Lorimer Moseley;Marcus Schiltenwolf;Aidan Cashin

  • The Effects of Graded Motor Imagery and Its Components on Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    K. Jane Bowering;Neil E. O'Connell;Abby Tabor;Abby Tabor;Mark J. Catley

  • Evidence for working memory deficits in chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Carolyn Berryman;Tasha R. Stanton;Tasha R. Stanton;K. Jane Bowering;Abby Tabor;Abby Tabor

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul W. Hodges
Paul W. Hodges University of Queensland
Alberto Gallace
Alberto Gallace University of Milano-Bicocca
Ann Meulders
Ann Meulders Maastricht University
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Martin Lotze
Martin Lotze University of Greifswald
Michael K. Nicholas
Michael K. Nicholas University of Sydney
Jill Cook
Jill Cook La Trobe University
Simon C. Gandevia
Simon C. Gandevia Neuroscience Research Australia
Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While pursuing a traditional medical degree in the USA requires significant time on campus, numerous related healthcare careers can be launched or advanced through online education. These flexible options are appealing for working professionals or those balancing family commitments.

For nurses aiming for leadership and advanced clinical roles, exploring the most affordable DNP programs can help achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice without the need to disrupt employment. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists can look into pharmacy school online options that provide a pathway to an in-demand healthcare field.

For those interested in the intersection of healthcare and data, rhit programs online offer a route to becoming a Registered Health Information Technician, a crucial support role in any medical setting. Additionally, those looking for faster workforce entry can benefit from billing and coding classes online, which lead to certifications valued by employers across the healthcare industry.

Each of these online degree and certificate pathways addresses a different aspect of the medical field, enabling students to find a program that fits their goals, schedule, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing G. Lorimer Moseley

Trending Scientists