World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geert Crombez

Geert Crombez

Award Badge
Psychology
Belgium
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 113 356 310 3 3 599 52198

Geert Crombez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Geert Crombez between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geert Crombez published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 19.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2024. 66 of the 755 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2024. 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 50 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 37 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 45 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 51 publications 2025: 15 publications
1988 2025

755 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Geert Crombez: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 3
1989 4
1990 3
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 3
1996 9
1997 8
1998 7
1999 6
2000 10
2001 9
2002 16
2003 19
2004 50
2005 30
2006 37
2007 25
2008 28
2009 45
2010 19
2011 28
2012 31
2013 38
2014 33
2015 32
2016 32
2017 22
2018 32
2019 17
2020 20
2021 19
2022 24
2023 21
2024 51
2025 15
Total 755
Download as CSV

Geert Crombez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert Crombez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 591–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 599 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14 599
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Geert Crombez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert Crombez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27 113
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

Geert Crombez is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium, contributing extensively to research in medicine and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including pharmacology, applied psychology, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, and general health professions. This interdisciplinary approach supports a broad investigation into health-related topics.

The main topics covered in Crombez's research include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Among the frequent coauthors collaborating with Crombez are Annick De Paepe, Dimitri Van Ryckeghem, Delfien Van Dyck, Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, and Maya Braun.

Publication venues where Crombez's work appears frequently include:

  • Pain
  • Journal of Pain
  • PeerJ
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Selected recent papers by Crombez highlight a range of research topics and methodologies:

  • Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission, 2020, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • The Effects of Gamification on Computerized Cognitive Training: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, JMIR Serious Games
  • Which behaviour change techniques are effective to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in adults: a factorial randomized trial of an e- and m-health intervention, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Content validity and methodological considerations in ecological momentary assessment studies on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Let's talk about pain catastrophizing measures: an item content analysis, 2020, PeerJ

Best Publications

  • The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence.

    Maaike Leeuw;Mariëlle E. J. B. Goossens;Steven J. Linton;Geert Crombez

  • Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain.

    Christopher Eccleston;G Crombez

  • Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability.

    Geert Crombez;Johan W.S Vlaeyen;Peter H.T.G Heuts;Roland Lysens

  • Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: the next generation.

    Geert Crombez;Christopher Eccleston;Stefaan Van Damme;Johan W S Vlaeyen;Johan W S Vlaeyen

  • Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis.

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Jan De Houwer;Marco Perugini;Frank Baeyens

  • Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Bruno Verschuere;Jan De Houwer

  • Fear-related avoidance of activities, falls and physical frailty. A prospective community-based cohort study

    Kim Delbaere;Geert Crombez;Guy Vanderstraeten;Tine Willems

  • Facing others in pain: the effects of empathy.

    Liesbet Goubert;K. D. Craig;Tine Vervoort;S. Morley

  • The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation

    Geert Crombez;Patricia Bijttebier;Chris Eccleston;Tamara Mascagni

  • A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations.

    Stefaan Van Damme;Geert Crombez;Patricia Bijttebier;Liesbet Goubert

  • The fear-avoidance model of pain.

    Johan W S Vlaeyen;Geert Crombez;Steven J Linton

  • A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety

    Bram Van Bockstaele;Bruno Verschuere;Helen Tibboel;Jan De Houwer

  • Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Bruno Verschuere;Stefaan Van Damme

  • Mood-congruent attentional bias in dysphoria: maintained attention to and impaired disengagement from negative information.

    Ernst H. W. Koster;Rudi De Raedt;Ellen Goeleven;Erik Franck

  • A neurocognitive model of attention to pain: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence

    Valéry Legrain;Stefaan Van Damme;Christopher Eccleston;Karen D. Davis

  • The role of neuroticism, pain catastrophizing and pain-related fear in vigilance to pain: a structural equations approach

    Liesbet Goubert;Liesbet Goubert;Geert Crombez;Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme;Stefaan Van Damme

  • Adolescent chronic pain: patterns and predictors of emotional distress in adolescents with chronic pain and their parents

    Christopher Eccleston;Geert Crombez;Anna Scotford;Anna Scotford;Jacqui Clinch;Jacqui Clinch

  • When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference

    Geert Crombez;Chris Eccleston;Frank Baeyens;Paul Eelen

  • The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: further examination of psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Liesbet Goubert;Madelon L. Peters;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen

  • Hypervigilance to pain: An experimental and clinical analysis

    Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme;Christopher Eccleston

Frequent Co-Authors

Liesbet Goubert
Liesbet Goubert Ghent University
Stefaan Van Damme
Stefaan Van Damme Ghent University
Christopher Eccleston
Christopher Eccleston University of Bath
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Frank Baeyens
Frank Baeyens KU Leuven
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Paul Eelen
Paul Eelen KU Leuven
Tine Vervoort
Tine Vervoort Ghent University
Ernst H. W. Koster
Ernst H. W. Koster Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of career pathways, particularly in fields that address mental health and addiction. One rapidly growing profession is substance abuse counseling. Educational requirements can vary by location, making it important to research local standards and options for online degrees.

For example, those interested in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Minneapolis will find that many employers now seek at least a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field, along with specialized training. In contrast, Nashville substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize state licensure, which often involves passing specific exams and supervised fieldwork.

Other cities also have unique standards. If you’re considering how to become a substance abuse counselor in New Orleans, online degree programs can offer the flexibility to meet local certification demands. Likewise, becoming a substance abuse counselor in New York City will usually require advanced credentials and ongoing professional development.

Best Scientists Citing Geert Crombez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles