World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tine Vervoort

Tine Vervoort

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5694
World Ranking
9198
National Ranking
132

Tine Vervoort publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tine Vervoort sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tine Vervoort D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tine Vervoort sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tine Vervoort is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine, with a substantial emphasis on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Their scholarly output encompasses 65 publications in Medicine, including 40 specifically related to pediatric health.

Their work spans multiple subfields, including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and General Health Professions. These areas collectively reflect a broad engagement with the biological, psychological, and therapeutic dimensions of medical science.

Key research topics addressed by Vervoort include:

  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Ethics in Medical Practice

Vervoort has published extensively in several academic journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Pain
  • European Journal of Pain
  • Pain Medicine
  • Journal of Pain
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Their recent papers include:

  • "A "dyadic dance": pain catastrophizing moderates the daily relationships between parent mood and protective responses and child chronic pain" (2020, Pain)
  • "Mental Health Outcomes Among Parents of Children With a Chronic Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Parental Burn-Out" (2021, Journal of Pediatric Psychology)
  • "Attentional biases in pediatric chronic pain: an eye-tracking study assessing the nature of the bias and its relation to attentional control" (2020, Pain)
  • "The time course of attentional biases in pain: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies" (2020, Pain)
  • "Parental (non-)pain attending verbalizations moderate the relationship between child attention and memory bias for pain" (2020, European Journal of Pain)

Throughout their career, Vervoort has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Dimitri Van Ryckeghem
  • Aline Wauters
  • Mélanie Noël
  • Emma Rheel
  • Zina Trost

Best Publications

  • Facing others in pain: the effects of empathy.

    Liesbet Goubert;K. D. Craig;Tine Vervoort;S. Morley

  • A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication

    Thomas Hadjistavropoulos;Kenneth D. Craig;Steve Duck;Annmarie Cano

  • Parental catastrophizing about their child's pain. The parent version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-P): a preliminary validation.

    Liesbet Goubert;Chris Eccleston;Tine Vervoort;Abbie Jordan

  • Catastrophic Thinking About Pain is Independently Associated with Pain Severity, Disability, and Somatic Complaints in School Children and Children with Chronic Pain

    Tine Vervoort;Liesbet Goubert;Christopher Eccleston;Patricia Bijttebier

  • Perceiving pain in others: automatic and controlled mechanisms.

    Kenneth D. Craig;Judith Versloot;Liesbet Goubert;Tine Vervoort

  • Parental catastrophizing about child's pain and its relationship with activity restriction: the mediating role of parental distress.

    Line Caes;Tine Vervoort;Tine Vervoort;Christopher Eccleston;Marieke Vandenhende

  • Parental Emotional Responses to Their Child’s Pain: The Role of Dispositional Empathy and Catastrophizing About Their Child’s Pain

    Liesbet Goubert;Liesbet Goubert;Tine Vervoort;Tine Vervoort;Michael J.L. Sullivan;Katrien Verhoeven;Katrien Verhoeven

  • Severity of pediatric pain in relation to school-related functioning and teacher support: an epidemiological study among school-aged children and adolescents.

    Tine Vervoort;Deirdre E. Logan;Liesbet Goubert;Bart De Clercq

  • Parental catastrophizing about their child's chronic pain: are mothers and fathers different?

    Tanja Hechler;Tine Vervoort;Maximiliane Hamann;Maximiliane Hamann;Anna-Lena Tietze

  • Children's catastrophic thinking about their pain predicts pain and disability 6 months later

    Tine Vervoort;C Eccleston;Liesbet Goubert;Ann Buysse

  • Catastrophizing about their children's pain is related to higher parent–child congruency in pain ratings: An experimental investigation

    Liesbet Goubert;Tine Vervoort;Annmarie Cano;Geert Crombez

  • Attentional processing of other's facial display of pain: an eye tracking study.

    Tine Vervoort;Zina Trost;Kenneth M. Prkachin;Sven C. Mueller

  • The effects of parental presence upon the facial expression of pain: the moderating role of child pain catastrophizing.

    T Vervoort;L Goubert;Christopher Eccleston;K Verhoeven

  • Threat of pain influences social context effects on verbal pain report and facial expression

    Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Marjolein Hanssen;Liesbet Goubert;Tine Vervoort

  • Expressive dimensions of pain catastrophizing: a comparative analysis of school children and children with clinical pain.

    Tine Vervoort;KD Craig;Liesbet Goubert;Jo Dehoorne

  • Social modulation of facial pain display in high-catastrophizing children: an observational study in schoolchildren and their parents.

    Tine Vervoort;Line Caes;Zina Trost;Michael J L Sullivan

  • Mothers' and fathers' responses to their child's pain moderate the relationship between the child's pain catastrophizing and disability.

    Tine Vervoort;A Huguet;Katrien Verhoeven;Katrien Verhoeven;Liesbet Goubert;Liesbet Goubert

  • We Discount the Pain of Others When Pain Has No Medical Explanation

    Lies De Ruddere;Liesbet Goubert;Tine Vervoort;Kenneth Martin Prkachin

  • Children’s selective attention to pain and avoidance behaviour: The role of child and parental catastrophizing about pain

    Tine Vervoort;Zina Trost;Dimitri M.L. Van Ryckeghem

  • Parents who catastrophize about their child’s pain prioritize attempts to control pain

    Line Caes;Tine Vervoort;Christopher Eccleston;Liesbet Goubert

  • Worry and catastrophizing about pain in youth: a reappraisal.

    Christopher Eccleston;Emma Alice Fisher;Tine Vervoort;Geert Crombez

Frequent Co-Authors

Liesbet Goubert
Liesbet Goubert Ghent University
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Christopher Eccleston
Christopher Eccleston University of Bath
Melanie Noel
Melanie Noel University of Calgary
Kenneth D. Craig
Kenneth D. Craig University of British Columbia
Kenneth M. Prkachin
Kenneth M. Prkachin University of Northern British Columbia
Keith Owen Yeates
Keith Owen Yeates University of Calgary
Annmarie Cano
Annmarie Cano Wayne State University
Stefan Sütterlin
Stefan Sütterlin Østfold University College
Jennifer Y. F. Lau
Jennifer Y. F. Lau Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse fields, many of which can now be accessed through flexible online options. For those aiming to advance their expertise, psychology masters programs online provide convenient pathways for working adults and recent graduates alike.

Those interested in working with individuals who have special behavioral needs may consider aba masters online programs. These programs focus on applied behavior analysis, helping professionals prepare for roles in clinical, educational, or community settings.

For advanced study and research opportunities, the best neuropsychology doctoral programs online can lead to careers in neuropsychological assessment and intervention, particularly for those interested in the connections between the brain and behavior.

If you are seeking a quicker route to start working in allied fields, consider the accelerated human services degree online. These programs offer a fast track to roles in counseling, case management, and community outreach, making a difference where it matters most.

Best Scientists Citing Tine Vervoort

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles