World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Todd Jackson

Todd Jackson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5502 5111 53 51 176 7949

Todd Jackson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Todd Jackson between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Todd Jackson published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 13 of the 257 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

257 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Todd Jackson: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 4
2001 0
2002 7
2003 2
2004 0
2005 6
2006 5
2007 5
2008 6
2009 7
2010 6
2011 8
2012 8
2013 9
2014 12
2015 8
2016 19
2017 6
2018 7
2019 8
2020 18
2021 27
2022 26
2023 19
2024 13
2025 12
2026 1
Total 257
Download as CSV

Todd Jackson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 176
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Todd Jackson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Todd Jackson is affiliated with the University of Macau in China and has contributed extensively to the fields of Psychology and Medicine. Their research spans various subfields, including Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Biological Psychiatry.

The primary focus of Jackson's work encompasses several main topics:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Tryptophan and Brain Disorders
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes

Jackson has co-authored numerous papers with a network of frequent collaborators, which includes:

  • Yu-Tao Xiang
  • Teris Cheung
  • Zhaohui Su
  • Qinge Zhang
  • Gábor S. Ungvári

Their work is published in various scientific venues, with recurring contributions to the following journals:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Body Image
  • Psychophysiology

Selected recent papers by Todd Jackson include:

  • Worldwide prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among community dwellers aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiology studies, 2022, PubMed
  • Depression, anxiety and associated factors among Chinese adolescents during the COVID-19 outbreak: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies, 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • Obesity increases the risk of depression in children and adolescents: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Network analysis of depressive and anxiety symptoms in adolescents during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, Translational Psychiatry
  • Network analysis of anxiety and depressive symptoms among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders

These publications reflect an ongoing research interest in mental health conditions, especially in relation to epidemiology, pandemic effects, and youth populations.

Best Publications

  • Self-efficacy and chronic pain outcomes: a meta-analytic review.

    Todd Jackson;Yalei Wang;Yang Wang;Huiyong Fan

  • Linking perceived organizational support with employee work outcomes in a Chinese context: Organizational identification as a mediator

    Yimo Shen;Todd Jackson;Cody Ding;Cody Ding;Denghua Yuan

  • The Negative Physical Self Scale: Initial development and validation in samples of Chinese adolescents and young adults

    Hong Chen;Todd Jackson;Xiting Huang;Xiting Huang

  • Obesity increases the risk of depression in children and adolescents: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Wen Wang Rao;Qian Qian Zong;Ji Wen Zhang;Feng Rong An

  • Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of eating disorder endorsements among adolescents and young adults from China.

    Hong Chen;Todd Jackson;Todd Jackson

  • Depression, anxiety and associated factors among Chinese adolescents during the COVID-19 outbreak: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies.

    Xu Chen;Han Qi;Rui Liu;Yuan Feng

  • The impact of threatening information about pain on coping and pain tolerance.

    Todd. Jackson;Laurie. Pope;Takeo. Nagasaka;April. Fritch

  • Predictive models for understanding body dissatisfaction among young males and females in China.

    Hong Chen;Xiao Gao;Todd Jackson

  • Towards explaining the association between shyness and loneliness: A path analysis with American college students

    Todd Jackson;April Fritch;Takeo Nagasaka;Jennifer Gunderson

  • Relationships between perceived close social support and health practices within community samples of American women and men.

    Todd Jackson

  • Network analysis of anxiety and depressive symptoms among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Wei Bai;Hai-Tao Xi;Qianqian Zhu;Mengmeng Ji

  • The factor structure of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test V 2.0 (MSCEIT): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach

    Huiyong Fan;Todd Jackson;Xinguo Yang;Wenqing Tang

  • Emotional primes modulate the responses to others’ pain: an ERP study

    Jing Meng;Li Hu;Lin Shen;Zhou Yang

  • Pain perception in the self and observation of others: An ERP investigation

    Jing Meng;Todd Jackson;Hong Chen;Li Hu

  • Personality traits and quality of relationships as predictors of future loneliness among American college students

    Todd Jackson;Adam Soderlind;Karen E. Weiss

  • Gender Differences in Pain Perception: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs

    Todd Jackson;Tony Iezzi;Jennifer Gunderson;Takeo Nagasaka

  • Sociocultural Predictors of Physical Appearance Concerns among Adolescent Girls and Young Women from China

    Todd Jackson;Todd Jackson;Hong Chen

  • Procrastination and Perceptions of Past, Present, and Future.

    Todd Jackson;April Fritch;Takeo Nagasaka;Laurie Pope

  • Gender, interpersonal transactions, and the perception of pain: an experimental analysis.

    Todd Jackson;Todd Jackson;Tony Iezzi;Hong Chen;Stephanie Ebnet

  • Gender and Age Group Differences in Mass Media and Interpersonal Influences on Body Dissatisfaction Among Chinese Adolescents

    Hong Chen;Todd Jackson

  • COVID-19-related stigma and its sociodemographic correlates: a comparative study.

    Yuan Yuan;Yan Jie Zhao;Qing E. Zhang;Ling Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Hong Chen
Hong Chen Southwest University
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang University of Macau
Gabor S. Ungvari
Gabor S. Ungvari University of Notre Dame Australia
Jiang Qiu
Jiang Qiu Southwest University
Dongtao Wei
Dongtao Wei Southwest University
Qinglin Zhang
Qinglin Zhang Southwest University
Li Hu
Li Hu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Tracy L. Tylka
Tracy L. Tylka The Ohio State University
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Viren Swami
Viren Swami Anglia Ruskin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers and further study options. Many students opt for online degrees, offering flexibility and the chance to balance education with other commitments. These degrees are often the first step toward specialized roles such as counseling, therapy, or clinical psychology.

Marriage and family therapy is a popular pathway for psychology graduates. If you are interested in learning more, explore guides like how to become a marriage and family therapist in Columbus, which details both online and in-person requirements. For those in Texas, specific insights can be found in how to become an mft in Corpus Christi and how to become an mft in Dallas. In Denver, requirements and job outlook are outlined in how to become a marriage and family therapist in Denver.

These resources highlight region-specific licensing, typical online course options, and the importance of supervised internships. Carefully exploring your area’s requirements and available online programs can help you create a clear path from studying psychology to launching a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Todd Jackson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles