World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7837 7310 4213 3829 147 8061

Kathryn Greene publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathryn Greene between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathryn Greene published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 5 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathryn Greene: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 6
2003 4
2004 2
2005 3
2006 3
2007 2
2008 11
2009 8
2010 7
2011 9
2012 11
2013 11
2014 5
2015 15
2016 6
2017 4
2018 0
2019 5
2020 6
2021 4
2022 5
2023 6
2024 8
2025 4
2026 1
Total 171
Download as CSV

Kathryn Greene publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn Greene sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathryn Greene D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn Greene sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathryn Greene is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including social sciences, medicine, and health professions, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to health communication and behavioral studies.

The primary fields of study for Kathryn Greene include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Medicine
  • Health Professions

Within these broader fields, their work focuses on several subfields such as sociology and political science, general health professions, applied psychology, oncology, and physiology.

Key topics covered in their research consist of:

  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Child Development and Digital Technology

Kathryn Greene has contributed extensively to academic journals, with frequent publications in venues such as:

  • Health Communication
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kathryn Greene include:

  • "Facilitating psychological adjustment for breast cancer patients through empathic communication and uncertainty reduction," 2023, Patient Education and Counseling
  • "Smokers' and Young Adult Non-Smokers' Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages," 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Short term effects of the REAL media e-learning media literacy substance prevention curriculum: An RCT of adolescents disseminated through a community organization," 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Exploring indicators of engagement in online learning as applied to adolescent health prevention: a pilot study of REAL media," 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development
  • "The Role of Engagement in Effective, Digital Prevention Interventions: the Function of Engagement in the REAL Media Substance Use Prevention Curriculum," 2020, Prevention Science

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with multiple joint publications alongside:

  • Maria K. Venetis
  • Katie A. Devine
  • Lauren Lee
  • Michael L. Hecht
  • Danielle Catona

Best Publications

  • The Theory of Reasoned Action

    Jerold L. Hale;Brian J. Householder;Kathryn L. Greene

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Self-Disclosure in Personal Relationships

    Kathryn Greene;Valerian J. Derlega;Alicia Mathews

  • Targeting adolescent risk-taking behaviors: the contributions of egocentrism and sensation-seeking.

    Kathryn Greene;Marina Krcmar;Lynda Henley Walters;Donald L. Rubin

  • Gender, Belief in the Sexual Double Standard, and Sexual Talk in Heterosexual Dating Relationships

    Kathryn Greene;Sandra L. Faulkner

  • Messages Influencing College Women's Tanning Bed Use: Statistical versus Narrative Evidence Format and a Self-Assessment to Increase Perceived Susceptibility

    Kathryn Greene;Laura S. Brinn

  • Privacy and disclosure of HIV in interpersonal relationships : a sourcebook for researchers and practitioners

    Kathryn Greene;Valerian J. Derlega;Gust A. Yep;Sandra Petronio

  • Reasons for HIV Disclosure/Nondisclosure in Close Relationships: Testing a Model of HIV-Disclosure Decision Making.

    Valerian J. Derlega;Barbara A. Winstead;Kathryn Greene;Julianne Serovich

  • Perceived HIV-related Stigma and HIV Disclosure to Relationship Partners after Finding Out about the Seropositive Diagnosis.

    Valerian J. Derlega;Barbara A. Winstead;Kathryn Greene;Julianne Serovich

  • Predicting exposure to and uses of television violence

    Marina Krcmar;Kathryn Greene

  • Gender-Typical Style in Written Language.

    Donald L. Rubin;Kathryn Greene

  • Role of Transportation in the Persuasion Process: Cognitive and Affective Responses to Antidrug Narratives

    Smita C Banerjee;Kathryn Greene

  • Assessing health diagnosis disclosure decisions in relationships: testing the disclosure decision-making model.

    Kathryn Greene;Kate Magsamen-Conrad;Maria K Venetis;Maria G Checton

  • Predicting Exposure to and Liking of Media Violence: A Uses and Gratifications Approach

    Kathryn Greene;Marina Krcmar

  • An integrated model of health disclosure decision-making.

    Kathryn Greene

  • Gentlemen don't speak: communication norms and condom use in bathhouses

    William N. Elwood;Kathryn Greene;Karen K. Carter

  • Social Penetration Theory

    Amanda Carpenter;Kathryn Greene

  • Analysis Versus Production: Adolescent Cognitive and Attitudinal Responses to Antismoking Interventions

    Smita C. Banerjee;Kathryn Greene

  • A test of the theory of reasoned action in the context of condom use and AIDS

    Kathryn Greene;Jerold L. Hale;Donald L. Rubin

  • Patients' and partners' perspectives of chronic illness and its management.

    Maria G. Checton;Kathryn Greene;Kate Magsamen-Conrad;Maria K. Venetis

  • Antismoking initiatives: effects of analysis versus production media literacy interventions on smoking-related attitude, norm, and behavioral intention.

    Smita C. Banerjee;Kathryn Greene

  • Expected versus actual responses to disclosure in relationships of HIV‐positive African American adolescent females

    Kathryn Greene;Sandra L. Faulkner

Frequent Co-Authors

Marina Krcmar
Marina Krcmar Wake Forest University
Michael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht Pennsylvania State University
Julianne M. Serovich
Julianne M. Serovich The Ohio State University
Valerian J. Derlega
Valerian J. Derlega Old Dominion University
Barbara A. Winstead
Barbara A. Winstead Old Dominion University
Jennifer L. Hay
Jennifer L. Hay Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jamie S. Ostroff
Jamie S. Ostroff Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Matthew R. Pearson
Matthew R. Pearson University of New Mexico
Yuelin Li
Yuelin Li Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Robin J. Lewis
Robin J. Lewis Old Dominion University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs can open the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways, such as counseling, therapy, and school support roles. Many students opt for flexible online degrees to quickly start making a difference in their communities.

Interested in a fast track to counseling? Some states offer accelerated options. For example, you can find the Wisconsin fastest counseling programs or consider the Wyoming accelerated counseling programs, both designed for those eager to begin their counseling careers sooner.

If you are interested in working with students, becoming a school counselor is a popular pathway. Each state has unique requirements—see resources on Alabama school counselor education requirements and steps for how to become a school counselor in Alaska.

No matter where you begin, researching location-specific certification and degree options is crucial. Online psychology degrees provide flexibility, diverse specializations, and a pathway to fulfilling careers in mental health and education.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn Greene

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles