World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6492 6045 3513 3190 167 6631

Matthew R. Pearson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew R. Pearson between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew R. Pearson published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2021. 21 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2021. 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 8 publications
2010 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew R. Pearson: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 3
2011 4
2012 7
2013 11
2014 11
2015 14
2016 12
2017 19
2018 15
2019 19
2020 10
2021 26
2022 12
2023 13
2024 13
2025 8
Total 197
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Pearson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Pearson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 167 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 167
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Pearson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Pearson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew R. Pearson is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a substantial number of publications contributed to these disciplines.

The main subfields in which Matthew R. Pearson has worked include Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Social Psychology. Their research topics have focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Mental Health Research Topics, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects.

Frequent publication venues for their work consist of:

  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Current Psychology
  • Addiction Research & Theory
  • Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • Can Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery Include Some Heavy Drinking? A Replication and Extension up to 9 Years Following Treatment (2020, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research)
  • The Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment Negative Emotionality Domain Among Treatment-Seekers with Alcohol Use Disorder: Construct Validity and Measurement Invariance (2020, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research)
  • Microaggressions and Psychological Health Among College Students: A Moderated Mediation Model of Rumination and Social Structure Beliefs (2020, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities)
  • Can Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorder Sustain Non-abstinent Recovery? Non-abstinent Outcomes 10 Years After Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment (2020, Journal of Addiction Medicine)
  • Understanding alcohol harm reduction behaviors from the perspective of self-determination theory: a research agenda (2020, Addiction Research & Theory)

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Dylan K. Richards, Frank J. Schwebel, Adrián J. Bravo, Katie Witkiewitz, and Angelina Pilatti. These collaborations illustrate a network of researchers focused on topics related to addiction, mental health, and behavioral interventions.

Best Publications

  • Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies among college students: a critical review.

    Matthew R. Pearson

  • Five Facets of Mindfulness and Psychological Health: Evaluating a Psychological Model of the Mechanisms of Mindfulness

    David B. Brown;Adrian J. Bravo;Corey R. Roos;Matthew R. Pearson

  • Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students

    Ashley N. Doane;Matthew R. Pearson;Michelle L. Kelley

  • College student marijuana involvement: Perceptions, use, and consequences across 11 college campuses.

    Matthew R. Pearson;Bruce S. Liese;Robert D. Dvorak

  • Exposure to Interparental Violence and Childhood Physical and Emotional Abuse as Related to Physical Aggression in Undergraduate Dating Relationships

    Robert J. Milletich;Michelle L. Kelley;Ashley N. Doane;Matthew R. Pearson

  • Ecological momentary assessment of acute alcohol use disorder symptoms: associations with mood, motives, and use on planned drinking days

    Robert D. Dvorak;Matthew R. Pearson;Anne M. Day

  • Impulsivity-like traits and risky driving behaviors among college students

    Matthew R. Pearson;Elaine M. Murphy;Ashley N. Doane

  • College student mental health: An evaluation of the DSM–5 self-rated Level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure.

    Adrian J Bravo;Margo C Villarosa-Hurlocker;Matthew R Pearson;Protective Strategies Study Team

  • Mindfulness and Emotional Outcomes: Identifying Subgroups of College Students Using Latent Profile Analysis

    Matthew R. Pearson;Adrienne K. Lawless;David B. Brown;Adrian J. Bravo

  • Reducing cyberbullying: A theory of reasoned action-based video prevention program for college students.

    Ashley N. Doane;Michelle L. Kelley;Matthew R. Pearson

  • Risky electronic communication behaviors and cyberbullying victimization

    Ashley N. Doane;Laura G. Boothe;Matthew R. Pearson;Michelle L. Kelley

  • Protective behavioral strategies as a mediator and moderator of the relationship between self-regulation and alcohol-related consequences in first-year college students.

    Gabrielle Maria D'Lima;Matthew R. Pearson;Michelle L. Kelley

  • Staying in the Moment and Finding Purpose: The Associations of Trait Mindfulness, Decentering, and Purpose in Life with Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety Symptoms, and Alcohol-Related Problems

    Matthew R. Pearson;David B. Brown;Adrian J. Bravo;Katie Witkiewitz

  • Getting Personal with Mindfulness: a Latent Profile Analysis of Mindfulness and Psychological Outcomes

    Adrian J. Bravo;Laura G. Boothe;Matthew R. Pearson

  • Profiles of recovery from alcohol use disorder at three years following treatment: can the definition of recovery be extended to include high functioning heavy drinkers?

    Katie Witkiewitz;Adam D. Wilson;Matthew R. Pearson;Kevin S. Montes

  • Questioning the validity of the 4+/5+ binge or heavy drinking criterion in college and clinical populations

    Matthew R. Pearson;Megan Kirouac;Katie Witkiewitz

  • Daily Use of Protective Behavioral Strategies and Alcohol-Related Outcomes Among College Students

    Matthew R. Pearson;Gabrielle M. D'Lima;Michelle L. Kelley

  • Predictive effects of good self-control and poor regulation on alcohol-related outcomes: do protective behavioral strategies mediate?

    Matthew R. Pearson;Benjamin A. Kite;James M. Henson

  • Quantifying Cannabis: A Field Study of Marijuana Quantity Estimation

    Mark A. Prince;Bradley T. Conner;Matthew R. Pearson

  • Self-regulation and alcohol use involvement: a latent class analysis.

    Nicholas J. Kuvaas;Robert D. Dvorak;Matthew R. Pearson;Dorian A. Lamis

  • Examining temptation to drink from an existential perspective: Associations among temptation, purpose in life, and drinking outcomes.

    Corey R. Roos;Megan Kirouac;Matthew R. Pearson;Brandi C. Fink

Frequent Co-Authors

Katie Witkiewitz
Katie Witkiewitz University of New Mexico
Generós Ortet
Generós Ortet Jaume I University
Michelle L. Kelley
Michelle L. Kelley Old Dominion University
Robert D. Dvorak
Robert D. Dvorak University of Central Florida
Stephen A. Maisto
Stephen A. Maisto Syracuse University
J. Scott Tonigan
J. Scott Tonigan University of New Mexico
Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Jennifer P. Read
Jennifer P. Read University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Barbara S. McCrady
Barbara S. McCrady University of New Mexico
John A. Fairbank
John A. Fairbank Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of dynamic career paths. Students can specialize in clinical roles, research, or even business and industry, making psychology one of the most versatile fields of study. For example, those interested in the types of jobs in neuropsychology can work in hospitals, rehabilitation centers, or research settings, focusing on brain-behavior relationships.

Alternatively, if you are drawn to understanding human behavior in the workplace, exploring organizational psychology jobs can lead to careers in human resources, consulting, or talent management. This field blends psychology with business and is ideal for improving workplace productivity and well-being.

When planning your future, it’s important to weigh the pros and cons of psychologist. The profession offers the reward of helping others, but can also involve emotional challenges and the need for ongoing education.

To further explore your options, check out the broad spectrum of career paths in psychology, from school counseling to research and forensic psychology. With the growth of online study options, many of these roles are now more accessible to students everywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew R. Pearson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles