World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
11513
World Ranking
5864
National Ranking
3183

Melissa A. Lewis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa A. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Melissa A. Lewis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa A. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Melissa A. Lewis is affiliated with the University of North Texas Health Science Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including medicine, psychology, and health professions, with significant contributions across these fields.

The main fields of study for Lewis include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Health Professions

Within these areas, their work further concentrates on subfields such as:

  • Epidemiology
  • General Health Professions
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology

Research topics covered by Lewis include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation

Lewis has contributed to various research articles, including the following recent publications:

  • Preventing College Sexual Victimization by Reducing Hookups: a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention (2020), published in Prevention Science
  • Injunctive and descriptive normative feedback for college drinking prevention: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? (2022), published in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Maritime traffic trends around the southern tip of Africa - Did marine noise pollution contribute to the local penguins' collapse? (2022), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Correlates of STI Testing Among US Young Adults: Opportunities for Prevention (2020), published in Prevention Science
  • Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for Community College Students (BASICCS): Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of web-conferencing BASICCS and supporting automated text messages. (2021), published in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Their scholarly work appears frequently in several publication venues, notably:

  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Substance Use & Misuse
  • Prevention Science

Lewis has collaborated extensively with various researchers, including:

  • D Litt
  • Anne M. Fairlie
  • Christine M. Lee
  • Zhengyang Zhou
  • Mary E. Larimer

Best Publications

  • Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

    Clayton Neighbors;Christine M. Lee;Melissa A. Lewis;Nicole Fossos

  • Targeting Misperceptions of Descriptive Drinking Norms: Efficacy of a Computer-Delivered Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention

    Clayton Neighbors;Mary E. Larimer;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: a review of the research on personalized normative feedback.

    Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms.

    Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Normative misperceptions and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking

    Clayton Neighbors;Amanda J Dillard;Melissa A Lewis;Rochelle L Bergstrom

  • The relative impact of injunctive norms on college student drinking: the role of reference group.

    Clayton Neighbors;Roisin M. O'Connor;Melissa A. Lewis;Neharika Chawla

  • Group Identification as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Social Norms and Alcohol Consumption

    Clayton Neighbors;Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Optimizing personalized normative feedback: the use of gender-specific referents.

    Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Being Controlled by Normative Influences: Self-Determination as a Moderator of a Normative Feedback Alcohol Intervention

    Clayton Neighbors;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Rochelle L. Bergstrom;Mary E. Larimer

  • Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: a statewide campaign.

    H. Wesley Perkins;Jeffrey W. Linkenbach;Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students.

    Melissa A. Lewis;Hollie Granato;Jessica A. Blayney;Ty W. Lostutter

  • Efficacy of Web-Based Personalized Normative Feedback: A Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

    Clayton Neighbors;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;David C. Atkins;Megan M. Jensen

  • Social motives and the interaction between descriptive and injunctive norms in college student drinking.

    Christine M. Lee;Irene Markman Geisner;Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Fitting in and feeling fine: Conformity and coping motives as mediators of the relationship between social anxiety and problematic drinking.

    Melissa A. Lewis;M. Christina Hove;Ursula Whiteside;Christine M. Lee

  • Internet-Based Personalized Feedback to Reduce 21st-Birthday Drinking: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Event-Specific Prevention Intervention.

    Clayton Neighbors;Christine M. Lee;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Nicole Fossos

  • Indicated prevention for incoming freshmen: personalized normative feedback and high-risk drinking.

    Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors;Laura Oster-Aaland;Benjamin S. Kirkeby

  • Event-specific drinking among college students.

    Clayton Neighbors;David C. Atkins;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Christine M. Lee

  • Self-Determination and the Use of Self-Presentation Strategies

    Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Event- and Context-Specific Normative Misperceptions and High-Risk Drinking: 21st Birthday Celebrations and Football Tailgating

    Clayton Neighbors;Laura Oster-Aaland;Laura Oster-Aaland;Rochelle L. Bergstrom;Rochelle L. Bergstrom;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Gender-specific Normative Misperceptions of Risky Sexual Behavior and Alcohol-related Risky Sexual Behavior

    Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Christine M. Lee;Megan E. Patrick;Nicole Fossos

Frequent Co-Authors

Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Christine M. Lee
Christine M. Lee University of Washington
Mary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer University of Washington
Debra Kaysen
Debra Kaysen Stanford University
Jason R. Kilmer
Jason R. Kilmer University of Washington
Megan E. Patrick
Megan E. Patrick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David C. Atkins
David C. Atkins University of Washington
Mats Berglund
Mats Berglund Lund University
Katie Witkiewitz
Katie Witkiewitz University of New Mexico
William H. George
William H. George University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a diverse array of online degrees and career opportunities. Many students choose to pursue advanced studies in specialized fields like counseling, mental health, or educational psychology. Online programs provide flexible options for working professionals or those balancing family commitments.

Depending on your location and career interests, certain areas stand out for their strong academic offerings. For example, there are top-ranked counseling degree programs in Philadelphia, while the best-ranked counseling degree programs in San Francisco give West Coast students compelling choices. If you’re considering Central California, look at the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Stockton. Texas also draws many future professionals with its popular counseling degrees in Texas.

From clinical practice and research to school psychology and community outreach, graduates can explore numerous pathways. Many roles require state licensure or further certification, so it's important to choose accredited programs and plan ahead for the qualifications needed in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Melissa A. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles