World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2619 2401 1509 1351 239 14303

Christine M. Lee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christine M. Lee between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christine M. Lee published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2021. 18 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christine M. Lee: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 13
2008 7
2009 9
2010 13
2011 9
2012 5
2013 15
2014 7
2015 8
2016 8
2017 13
2018 20
2019 11
2020 20
2021 42
2022 24
2023 23
2024 20
2025 17
2026 1
Total 292
Download as CSV

Christine M. Lee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine M. Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 239
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christine M. Lee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine M. Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christine M. Lee is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and psychology, with a significant focus on substance use and behavioral health.

The main fields of study include Medicine and Psychology. Within these fields, their subfields of expertise cover Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, and Clinical Psychology.

Their primary topics of work are:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Christine M. Lee include:

  • Increases in Loneliness Among Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Association With Increases in Mental Health Problems (2020), published in Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use Among Young Adults: A Scoping Review of Prevalence, Patterns, Psychosocial Correlates, and Consequences (2022), published in Alcohol research
  • A Daily Study Comparing Alcohol-Related Positive and Negative Consequences for Days With Only Alcohol Use Versus Days With Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use in a Community Sample of Young Adults (2020), published in Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research

Frequent co-authors of Christine M. Lee include:

  • Scott Graupensperger
  • Megan E. Patrick
  • Anne M. Fairlie
  • Brian H. Calhoun
  • Isaac C. Rhew

Christine M. Lee has published extensively in venues such as:

  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research

Best Publications

  • Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

    Clayton Neighbors;Christine M. Lee;Melissa A. Lewis;Nicole Fossos

  • Marijuana motives: young adults' reasons for using marijuana.

    Christine M. Lee;Clayton Neighbors;Briana A. Woods

  • Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.

    Mary E. Larimer;Christine M. Lee;Jason R. Kilmer;Patricia M. Fabiano

  • The relative impact of injunctive norms on college student drinking: the role of reference group.

    Clayton Neighbors;Roisin M. O'Connor;Melissa A. Lewis;Neharika Chawla

  • Body Image Concerns and Contingent Self-Esteem in Male and Female College Students.

    Joel R. Grossbard;Christine M. Lee;Clayton Neighbors;Mary E. Larimer

  • Group Identification as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Social Norms and Alcohol Consumption

    Clayton Neighbors;Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Cannabis use among patients at a comprehensive cancer center in a state with legalized medicinal and recreational use

    Steven A. Pergam;Maresa C. Woodfield;Christine M. Lee;Guang‐Shing Cheng

  • Development and Preliminary Validation of a Comprehensive Marijuana Motives Questionnaire

    Christine M. Lee;Clayton Neighbors;Christian S. Hendershot;Joel R. Grossbard

  • Efficacy of Web-Based Personalized Normative Feedback: A Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

    Clayton Neighbors;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;David C. Atkins;Megan M. Jensen

  • Social motives and the interaction between descriptive and injunctive norms in college student drinking.

    Christine M. Lee;Irene Markman Geisner;Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Fitting in and feeling fine: Conformity and coping motives as mediators of the relationship between social anxiety and problematic drinking.

    Melissa A. Lewis;M. Christina Hove;Ursula Whiteside;Christine M. Lee

  • Internet-Based Personalized Feedback to Reduce 21st-Birthday Drinking: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Event-Specific Prevention Intervention.

    Clayton Neighbors;Christine M. Lee;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Nicole Fossos

  • Misperceptions of college student marijuana use: implications for prevention.

    Jason R Kilmer;Denise D Walker;Denise D Walker;Christine M Lee;Christine M Lee;Rebekka S Palmer;Rebekka S Palmer;Rebekka S Palmer

  • Perceived marijuana norms and social expectancies among entering college student marijuana users.

    Clayton Neighbors;Irene M. Geisner;Christine M. Lee

  • A brief, web-based personalized feedback selective intervention for college student marijuana use: a randomized clinical trial.

    Christine M. Lee;Clayton Neighbors;Jason R. Kilmer;Mary E. Larimer

  • Event-Specific Prevention: addressing college student drinking during known windows of risk.

    Clayton Neighbors;Scott T. Walters;Christine M. Lee;Amanda M. Vader

  • Marijuana use, risk perception, and consequences: is perceived risk congruent with reality?

    Jason R. Kilmer;Scott B. Hunt;Christine M. Lee;Clayton Neighbors

  • Social norms and vaccine uptake: College students' COVID vaccination intentions, attitudes, and estimated peer norms and comparisons with influenza vaccine.

    Scott Graupensperger;Devon A. Abdallah;Christine M. Lee

  • Event-specific drinking among college students.

    Clayton Neighbors;David C. Atkins;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Christine M. Lee

  • Gender-specific Normative Misperceptions of Risky Sexual Behavior and Alcohol-related Risky Sexual Behavior

    Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Christine M. Lee;Megan E. Patrick;Nicole Fossos

Frequent Co-Authors

Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Melissa A. Lewis
Melissa A. Lewis University of North Texas Health Science Center
Mary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer University of Washington
Megan E. Patrick
Megan E. Patrick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jason R. Kilmer
Jason R. Kilmer University of Washington
Debra Kaysen
Debra Kaysen Stanford University
David C. Atkins
David C. Atkins University of Washington
Eric R. Pedersen
Eric R. Pedersen University of Southern California
Jennifer L. Maggs
Jennifer L. Maggs Pennsylvania State University
Joseph W. LaBrie
Joseph W. LaBrie Loyola Marymount University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Psychology, exploring online related degrees—such as Social Work—can open many career doors. Social work and psychology overlap in areas like mental health counseling, community outreach, and support services. Many accredited universities in the U.S. now offer flexible online options that make advancing your studies or switching careers more accessible and affordable.

When considering further study, cost is a major factor. Students searching for affordable online social work master's degrees in USA can find a range of schools providing comprehensive education without a heavy financial burden. For those located in specific states, you might want to review the cheapest online social work programs in Ohio or the most affordable online social work degree programs in Tennessee to find programs that fit both your goals and your budget.

If you’re based in the South, researching the cheapest social work degrees in Arkansas can reveal localized opportunities for online study. Each program offers unique specializations and practical pathways, helping you build a rewarding career that complements your background in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Christine M. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles