World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 90 954 832 602 514 328 30358

Mary E. Larimer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary E. Larimer between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary E. Larimer published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 26 of the 363 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications
1990 2025

363 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary E. Larimer: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 2
1999 5
2000 2
2001 1
2002 8
2003 5
2004 11
2005 2
2006 13
2007 20
2008 9
2009 23
2010 18
2011 11
2012 22
2013 26
2014 25
2015 17
2016 11
2017 8
2018 11
2019 8
2020 14
2021 22
2022 21
2023 13
2024 12
2025 14
Total 363
Download as CSV

Mary E. Larimer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Larimer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 328 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 328
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary E. Larimer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Larimer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77 90
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary E. Larimer is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with considerable contributions in subfields such as Epidemiology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, and Pharmacology.

The main topics of their research include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Health Policy Implementation Science, Homelessness and Social Issues, Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects, and Smoking Behavior and Cessation.

Frequent publication venues for Mary E. Larimer include:

  • Prevention Science
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Mary E. Larimer has collaborated extensively with multiple coauthors, notably:

  • Christine M. Lee
  • Jason R. Kilmer
  • Brittney A. Hultgren
  • Scott Graupensperger
  • Isaac C. Rhew

Selected recent papers authored by Mary E. Larimer include:

  • A Daily Study Comparing Alcohol-Related Positive and Negative Consequences for Days With Only Alcohol Use Versus Days With Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use in a Community Sample of Young Adults, 2020, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Associations Between Mindfulness and Mental Health Outcomes: a Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Research, 2020, Mindfulness
  • Changes in College Student Alcohol Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Are Perceived Drinking Norms Still Relevant?, 2021, Emerging Adulthood
  • Young Adults Underestimate How Well Peers Adhere to COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Guidelines, 2021, The Journal of Primary Prevention
  • Daily-level effects of alcohol, marijuana, and simultaneous use on young adults' perceived sleep health, 2021, SLEEP

Best Publications

  • Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

    G. Alan Marlatt;John S. Baer;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Linda A. Dimeff

  • Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.

    John S. Baer;Alan Stacy;Mary Larimer

  • Relapse Prevention: An Overview of Marlatt’s Cognitive-Behavioral Model

    Mary E. Larimer;Rebekka S. Palmer;G. Alan Marlatt

  • Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: a pilot efficacy trial.

    Sarah Bowen;Neharika Chawla;Susan E. Collins;Katie Witkiewitz

  • Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

    Clayton Neighbors;Christine M. Lee;Melissa A. Lewis;Nicole Fossos

  • Targeting Misperceptions of Descriptive Drinking Norms: Efficacy of a Computer-Delivered Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention

    Clayton Neighbors;Mary E. Larimer;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Relative Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention, Standard Relapse Prevention, and Treatment as Usual for Substance Use Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Sarah Bowen;Katie Witkiewitz;Seema L. Clifasefi;Joel Grow

  • Health Care and Public Service Use and Costs Before and After Provision of Housing for Chronically Homeless Persons With Severe Alcohol Problems

    Mary E. Larimer;Daniel K. Malone;Michelle D. Garner;David C. Atkins

  • Mindfulness meditation and substance use in an incarcerated population

    Sarah Bowen;Katie Witkiewitz;Tiara M. Dillworth;Neharika Chawla

  • Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: Individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.

    Mary E. Larimer;Jessica M. Cronce

  • Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students.

    Mary E Larimer;Jessica M Cronce

  • Difficulties regulating emotions: Do binge eaters have fewer strategies to modulate and tolerate negative affect?

    Ursula Whiteside;Eunice Chen;Clayton Neighbors;Dorian Hunter

  • Predicting drinking behavior and alcohol-related problems among fraternity and sorority members: examining the role of descriptive and injunctive norms.

    Mary E. Larimer;Aaron P. Turner;Kimberly A. Mallett;Irene Markman Geisner

  • Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities.

    Mary E. Larimer;Aaron P. Turner;Britt K. Anderson;Jonathan S. Fader

  • An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults.

    J. S. Baer;G. A. Marlatt;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Kim Fromme

  • Exploring college student gambling motivation.

    Clayton Neighbors;Ty W. Lostutter;Jessica M. Cronce;Mary E. Larimer

  • Domestic Violence and Alcohol Use: Trauma-related Symptoms and Motives for Drinking

    Debra Kaysen;Tiara M. Dillworth;Tracy Simpson;Angela Waldrop;Angela Waldrop

  • Male and Female Recipients of Unwanted Sexual Contact in a College Student Sample: Prevalence Rates, Alcohol Use, and Depression Symptoms

    Mary E. Larimer;Amy R. Lydum;Britt K. Anderson;Aaron P. Turner

  • Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.

    Mary E. Larimer;Christine M. Lee;Jason R. Kilmer;Patricia M. Fabiano

  • Individual-Focused Approaches to the Prevention of College Student Drinking

    Jessica M. Cronce;Mary E. Larimer

  • Identification, prevention and treatment

    Mary E. Larimer;Jessica M. Cronce

  • RelativeEfficacyofMindfulness-BasedRelapsePrevention, StandardRelapsePrevention,andTreatmentasUsual forSubstanceUseDisorders A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Sarah Bowen;Katie Witkiewitz;Seema L. Clifasefi;Joel Grow

Frequent Co-Authors

Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Christine M. Lee
Christine M. Lee University of Washington
Melissa A. Lewis
Melissa A. Lewis University of North Texas Health Science Center
Jason R. Kilmer
Jason R. Kilmer University of Washington
Mats Berglund
Mats Berglund Lund University
David C. Atkins
David C. Atkins University of Washington
Eric R. Pedersen
Eric R. Pedersen University of Southern California
Katie Witkiewitz
Katie Witkiewitz University of New Mexico
Kimberly A. Mallett
Kimberly A. Mallett Pennsylvania State University
Megan E. Patrick
Megan E. Patrick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of rewarding career pathways, particularly in social work and mental health services. Many students consider online psychology or social work degrees, allowing for academic flexibility while preparing for meaningful roles that help individuals and communities.

Each state has its own requirements for social work licensure and practice. If you’re interested in pursuing this path, it is important to understand regional specifics. For example, those interested in working in Massachusetts should explore how to become a social worker in Massachusetts. In Michigan, licensure comes with its own set of processes, outlined in detail on the page for Michigan social work license requirements.

Similarly, prospective social workers in Minnesota can find step-by-step advice on how to become a social worker in Minnesota, while those in Mississippi will want to review the Mississippi social work license requirements.

By researching local licensure paths and considering online degree options, students can align their education with the specific qualifications needed for a successful and impactful career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Mary E. Larimer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles