World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 92 890 778 564 483 427 27174

Clayton Neighbors publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Clayton Neighbors between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Clayton Neighbors published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2013. 17 of the 451 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2013. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 9 publications
2001 2025

451 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Clayton Neighbors: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 6
2003 4
2004 14
2005 5
2006 16
2007 31
2008 18
2009 23
2010 19
2011 19
2012 23
2013 39
2014 36
2015 30
2016 36
2017 23
2018 14
2019 21
2020 10
2021 24
2022 12
2023 9
2024 8
2025 9
Total 451
Download as CSV

Clayton Neighbors publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clayton Neighbors sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–430 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 427 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50 427
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Clayton Neighbors D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clayton Neighbors sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 92
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Clayton Neighbors is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States and has a research profile that centers on psychology and medicine. Their contributions span several subfields including epidemiology, applied psychology, clinical psychology, general health professions, and social psychology.

The scientist's research addresses a range of topics primarily related to behavioral health, substance use, and mental health. Key areas of work include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, mental health research topics, cannabis and cannabinoid research, homelessness and social issues, suicide and self-harm studies, and smoking behavior and cessation.

Clayton Neighbors has published extensively in several journals, with frequent publication venues including:

  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of American College Health
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Some of their recent papers include the following:

  • "A Marijuana Consequences Checklist for Young Adults with Implications for Brief Motivational Intervention Research" (2020) published in Prevention Science
  • "Stressful life events and gambling: The roles of coping and impulsivity among college students" (2020) published in Addictive Behaviors
  • "Injunctive and descriptive normative feedback for college drinking prevention: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?" (2022) published in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • "Flow mediates the relationship between problematic smartphone use and satisfaction with life among college students" (2021) published in Journal of American College Health
  • "Cannabis Outcome Expectancies, Cannabis Use Motives, and Cannabis Use among a Small Sample of Frequent Using Adults" (2021) published in Cannabis

Clayton Neighbors frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors. The list of frequent co-authors includes:

  • Kristen P. Lindgren
  • Lindsey M. Rodriguez
  • Angelo M. DiBello
  • Mary M Tomkins
  • Chelsie M. Young

Best Publications

  • Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

    Clayton Neighbors;Christine M. Lee;Melissa A. Lewis;Nicole Fossos

  • Targeting Misperceptions of Descriptive Drinking Norms: Efficacy of a Computer-Delivered Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention

    Clayton Neighbors;Mary E. Larimer;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Interventions to reduce harm associated with adolescent substance use

    John W. Toumbourou;Timothy R. Stockwell;Timothy R. Stockwell;Clayton Neighbors;G. A. Marlatt

  • Difficulties regulating emotions: Do binge eaters have fewer strategies to modulate and tolerate negative affect?

    Ursula Whiteside;Eunice Chen;Clayton Neighbors;Dorian Hunter

  • Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: a review of the research on personalized normative feedback.

    Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms.

    Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: What, why and for whom?

    Scott T. Walters;Clayton Neighbors

  • A tutorial on count regression and zero-altered count models for longitudinal substance use data

    David C. Atkins;Scott A. Baldwin;Cheng Zheng;Robert J. Gallop

  • Marijuana motives: young adults' reasons for using marijuana.

    Christine M. Lee;Clayton Neighbors;Briana A. Woods

  • Exploring college student gambling motivation.

    Clayton Neighbors;Ty W. Lostutter;Jessica M. Cronce;Mary E. Larimer

  • Normative misperceptions and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking

    Clayton Neighbors;Amanda J Dillard;Melissa A Lewis;Rochelle L Bergstrom

  • Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.

    Mary E. Larimer;Christine M. Lee;Jason R. Kilmer;Patricia M. Fabiano

  • Appearance-Related Social Comparisons: The Role of Contingent Self-Esteem and Self-Perceptions of Attractiveness:

    Heather Patrick;Clayton Neighbors;C. Raymond Knee

  • The relative impact of injunctive norms on college student drinking: the role of reference group.

    Clayton Neighbors;Roisin M. O'Connor;Melissa A. Lewis;Neharika Chawla

  • Normative misperception and the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms on college student gambling.

    Mary E. Larimer;Clayton Neighbors

  • Body Image Concerns and Contingent Self-Esteem in Male and Female College Students.

    Joel R. Grossbard;Christine M. Lee;Clayton Neighbors;Mary E. Larimer

  • Group Identification as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Social Norms and Alcohol Consumption

    Clayton Neighbors;Joseph W. LaBrie;Justin F. Hummer;Melissa A. Lewis

  • Optimizing personalized normative feedback: the use of gender-specific referents.

    Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • Being Controlled by Normative Influences: Self-Determination as a Moderator of a Normative Feedback Alcohol Intervention

    Clayton Neighbors;Melissa Ardelle Lewis;Rochelle L. Bergstrom;Mary E. Larimer

  • Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: a statewide campaign.

    H. Wesley Perkins;Jeffrey W. Linkenbach;Melissa A. Lewis;Clayton Neighbors

  • The relationship among alcohol use, related problems, and symptoms of psychological distress: Gender as a moderator in a college sample

    Irene Markman Geisner;Mary E Larimer;Clayton Neighbors

Frequent Co-Authors

Melissa A. Lewis
Melissa A. Lewis University of North Texas Health Science Center
Christine M. Lee
Christine M. Lee University of Washington
Mary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer University of Washington
Michael J. Zvolensky
Michael J. Zvolensky University of Houston
Eric R. Pedersen
Eric R. Pedersen University of Southern California
Debra Kaysen
Debra Kaysen Stanford University
Joseph W. LaBrie
Joseph W. LaBrie Loyola Marymount University
C. Raymond Knee
C. Raymond Knee University of Houston
Roger A. Roffman
Roger A. Roffman University of Washington
David C. Atkins
David C. Atkins University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a wide range of careers, including licensed counseling and therapy. Many students explore becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a popular and impactful career path. Requirements vary by region, so it’s important to research state-specific licensure guidelines early.

For example, those interested in practicing in Virginia Beach should learn more about how to become an mft in Virginia Beach. Similarly, individuals planning to work in the nation’s capital will want to review mft requirements in Washington DC.

Different cities and states have unique educational and clinical experience standards. Discover Wichita mft certification requirements and explore mft requirements in Winston Salem for the most current information.

Online psychology degrees often provide the foundational coursework to pursue MFT licensure, but you’ll need to confirm your program meets local requirements. Research thoroughly and plan ahead to map your ideal career pathway in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Clayton Neighbors

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles