World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
8309
World Ranking
4412
National Ranking
596

Fei Gao publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fei Gao sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fei Gao D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fei Gao sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fei Gao is affiliated with Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications in China. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with significant contributions in artificial intelligence, atomic and molecular physics and optics, computational theory and mathematics, computer networks and communications, and information systems.

Their work spans several key topics including quantum computing algorithms and architecture, quantum information and cryptography, quantum mechanics and applications, cryptography and data security, privacy-preserving technologies in data, quantum-dot cellular automata, and chaos-based image and signal encryption.

Fei Gao has published extensively, with notable papers such as:

  • A quantum federated learning framework for classical clients (2024) in Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy
  • Error Tolerance Bound in QKD-Based Quantum Private Query (2020) in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
  • Novel quantum circuit implementation of Advanced Encryption Standard with low costs (2022) in Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy
  • Improved quantum algorithm for A-optimal projection (2020) in Physical Review A
  • Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning Against Inference Attack (2022) in IEEE Internet of Things Journal

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Advanced Quantum Technologies, Physical Review A, Quantum Information Processing, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, and arXiv.

  • Advanced Quantum Technologies
  • Physical Review A
  • Quantum Information Processing
  • Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • arXiv

Fei Gao collaborates with several co-authors on numerous projects. Frequent collaborators include Su-Juan Qin, Qiaoyan Wen, Hailing Liu, Fen-Zhuo Guo, and Hua Zhang.

  • Su-Juan Qin
  • Qiaoyan Wen
  • Hailing Liu
  • Fen-Zhuo Guo
  • Hua Zhang

Best Publications

  • Cryptanalysis of the Hillery-Bužek-Berthiaume quantum secret-sharing protocol

    Su-Juan Qin;Fei Gao;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Quantum secure direct communication with χ -type entangled states

    Song Lin;Song Lin;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fei Gao;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • A simple participant attack on the brádler-dušek protocol

    Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Cryptanalysis of multiparty controlled quantum secure direct communication using Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state

    Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Revisiting the security of quantum dialogue and bidirectional quantum secure direct communication

    Fei Gao;FenZhuo Guo;QiaoYan Wen;FuChen Zhu

  • Cryptanalysis of the arbitrated quantum signature protocols

    Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin;Fen-Zhuo Guo;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Improving the security of multiparty quantum secret sharing against an attack with a fake signal

    Su-Juan Qin;Su-Juan Qin;Fei Gao;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Flexible quantum private queries based on quantum key distribution.

    Fei Gao;Bin Liu;Qiao-Yan Wen;Hui Chen

  • A watermark strategy for quantum images based on quantum fourier transform

    Wei-Wei Zhang;Fei Gao;Bin Liu;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Quantum private query: A new kind of practical quantum cryptographic protocol

    Fei Gao;SuJuan Qin;Wei Huang;QiaoYan Wen

  • Multiparty quantum key agreement with single particles

    Bin Liu;Fei Gao;Wei Huang;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Comment on "experimental demonstration of a quantum protocol for Byzantine agreement and liar detection".

    Fei Gao;Fen-Zhuo Guo;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Quantum nonlocality of multipartite orthogonal product states

    Guang-Bao Xu;Guang-Bao Xu;Qiao-Yan Wen;Su-Juan Qin;Ying-Hui Yang

  • A Generic Construction of Quantum-Oblivious-Key-Transfer-Based Private Query with Ideal Database Security and Zero Failure

    Chun-Yan Wei;Xiao-Qiu Cai;Bin Liu;Tian-Yin Wang

  • Postprocessing of the Oblivious Key in Quantum Private Query

    Fei Gao;Bin Liu;Wei Huang;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Practical quantum private query with better performance in resisting joint-measurement attack

    Chun-Yan Wei;Tian-Yin Wang;Fei Gao

  • Novel multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with GHZ states

    Guang-Bao Xu;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin

  • Quantum key agreement with EPR pairs and single-particle measurements

    Wei Huang;Qiao-Yan Wen;Bin Liu;Fei Gao

  • Dense-Coding Attack on Three-Party Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

    Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin;Fen-Zhuo Guo;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • QKD-based quantum private query without a failure probability

    Bin Liu;Bin Liu;Fei Gao;Wei Huang;QiaoYan Wen

  • Multiparty quantum secret sharing based on Bell measurement

    Ying Sun;Ying Sun;Qiao-yan Wen;Fei Gao;Xiu-bo Chen

  • Comment on: Experimental Demonstration of a Quantum Protocol for Byzantine Agreement and Liar Detection. Authors' reply

    Fei Gao;Fen-Zhuo Guo;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

Frequent Co-Authors

Qiao-Yan Wen
Qiao-Yan Wen Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Kaitai Liang
Kaitai Liang Delft University of Technology
Valerio Scarani
Valerio Scarani National University of Singapore
Barry C. Sanders
Barry C. Sanders University of Calgary

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science doesn't have to follow a single track. There are a variety of related online degrees and certifications that can broaden your skill set or open up alternative tech careers.

For those interested in the scientific foundations of technology, consider a bachelor of science in physics online. This program offers a strong analytical background and can be studied remotely, combining flexibility with affordability.

If you're intrigued by the growing field of big data, a data science learning path might be the right next step. These programs teach valuable skills in analytics, machine learning, and statistical modeling, all of which are in high demand across industries.

Another excellent option is enrolling in one of the best online electrical engineering programs USA. These degrees focus on applied technology and engineering principles, equipping you for a wide range of high-paying jobs.

If you’re looking for a faster route into the workforce, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can quickly boost your credentials and help you launch a lucrative tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Fei Gao

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles