World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
70
Citations
15854
World Ranking
1902
National Ranking
263

Qiao-Yan Wen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qiao-Yan Wen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 480 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Qiao-Yan Wen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qiao-Yan Wen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Qiao-Yan Wen is affiliated with Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications in China and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence and quantum technologies. Their research includes substantial work on quantum computing algorithms, quantum information science, and cryptographic methods.

The scientist's main fields of study encompass:

  • Computer Science

Within computer science, their research is concentrated in several subfields:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Information Systems
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Qiao-Yan Wen's work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

They have published in multiple scientific venues with a significant number of papers appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Advanced Quantum Technologies
  • Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • Quantum Information Processing
  • Physical review. A/Physical review, A

Frequent co-authors in Qiao-Yan Wen's publications include:

  • Su-Juan Qin
  • Fei Gao
  • Hua Zhang
  • Hailing Liu
  • Wenmin Li

Selected recent papers exemplify the range and focus of their research:

  • "A quantum federated learning framework for classical clients," 2024, Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy
  • "Error Tolerance Bound in QKD-Based Quantum Private Query," 2020, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
  • "A new provably secure certificateless signature scheme for Internet of Things," 2020, Ad Hoc Networks
  • "Novel quantum circuit implementation of Advanced Encryption Standard with low costs," 2022, Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy
  • "Improved quantum algorithm for A-optimal projection," 2020, Physical review. A/Physical review, A

In addition to journal articles, Qiao-Yan Wen has contributed to book publications, including a title on cybersecurity published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2020.

Best Publications

  • A survey on the security of blockchain systems

    Xiaoqi Li;Peng Jiang;Ting Chen;Xiapu Luo

  • Cryptanalysis of the Hillery-Bužek-Berthiaume quantum secret-sharing protocol

    Su-Juan Qin;Fei Gao;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • An efficient protocol for the private comparison of equal information based on the triplet entangled state and single-particle measurement

    Xiu-Bo Chen;Gang Xu;Xin-Xin Niu;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Quantum secure direct communication with χ -type entangled states

    Song Lin;Song Lin;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fei Gao;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • A simple participant attack on the brádler-dušek protocol

    Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • A steganographic method for digital images with four-pixel differencing and modified LSB substitution

    Xin Liao;Qiao-yan Wen;Jie Zhang

  • Cryptanalysis of multiparty controlled quantum secure direct communication using Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state

    Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Revisiting the security of quantum dialogue and bidirectional quantum secure direct communication

    Fei Gao;FenZhuo Guo;QiaoYan Wen;FuChen Zhu

  • Cryptanalysis of the arbitrated quantum signature protocols

    Fei Gao;Su-Juan Qin;Fen-Zhuo Guo;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Improving the security of multiparty quantum secret sharing against an attack with a fake signal

    Su-Juan Qin;Su-Juan Qin;Fei Gao;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Flexible quantum private queries based on quantum key distribution.

    Fei Gao;Bin Liu;Qiao-Yan Wen;Hui Chen

  • A watermark strategy for quantum images based on quantum fourier transform

    Wei-Wei Zhang;Fei Gao;Bin Liu;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Secure quantum private comparison

    Yu-Guang Yang;Yu-Guang Yang;Wei-Feng Cao;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Quantum private query: A new kind of practical quantum cryptographic protocol

    Fei Gao;SuJuan Qin;Wei Huang;QiaoYan Wen

  • Multiparty quantum key agreement with single particles

    Bin Liu;Fei Gao;Wei Huang;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • Comment on "experimental demonstration of a quantum protocol for Byzantine agreement and liar detection".

    Fei Gao;Fen-Zhuo Guo;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

  • Quantum nonlocality of multipartite orthogonal product states

    Guang-Bao Xu;Guang-Bao Xu;Qiao-Yan Wen;Su-Juan Qin;Ying-Hui Yang

  • Efficient and provably-secure certificateless short signature scheme from bilinear pairings

    Hongzhen Du;Qiaoyan Wen

  • Postprocessing of the Oblivious Key in Quantum Private Query

    Fei Gao;Bin Liu;Wei Huang;Qiao-Yan Wen

  • An Anti-Quantum Transaction Authentication Approach in Blockchain

    Wei Yin;Qiaoyan Wen;Wenmin Li;Hua Zhang

  • An efficient and secure multiparty quantum secret sharing scheme based on single photons

    Tian-yin Wang;Qiao-yan Wen;Xiu-bo Chen;Fen-zhuo Guo

  • Comment on: Experimental Demonstration of a Quantum Protocol for Byzantine Agreement and Liar Detection. Authors' reply

    Fei Gao;Fen-Zhuo Guo;Qiao-Yan Wen;Fu-Chen Zhu

Frequent Co-Authors

Fei Gao
Fei Gao Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Kaitai Liang
Kaitai Liang Delft University of Technology
Yixian Yang
Yixian Yang Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Wei Huang
Wei Huang Northwestern Polytechnical University
Yudong Zhang
Yudong Zhang University of Leicester
Lixiang Li
Lixiang Li Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Wei Ni
Wei Ni Edith Cowan University
Ren Ping Liu
Ren Ping Liu University of Technology Sydney
Debiao He
Debiao He Wuhan University
Liqun Chen
Liqun Chen University of Surrey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and exciting career paths. As technology, engineering, and science fields continue to overlap, students are finding value in interdisciplinary skills.

For those interested in environmental challenges, you might wonder what can I do with an environmental science degree. Environmental science blends well with computer science in roles like data analysis, simulation, and resource management.

If you're seeking flexibility or a faster route, some schools offer a 1 year computer science degree online. These accelerated programs are ideal for career changers or professionals aiming to quickly upskill.

Engineering is another allied field with strong online learning options. Interested in sustainability? Check out the environmental engineering schools online. Passionate about technology design? Look for the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online to expand your options affordably.

Combining online degrees with computer science can broaden your expertise and help you stand out in a dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Qiao-Yan Wen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles