World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
140
Citations
87503
World Ranking
1673
National Ranking
967

Malcolm C. Pike publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm C. Pike sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 681 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Malcolm C. Pike D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm C. Pike sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Malcolm C. Pike is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical fields with a significant emphasis on reproductive medicine, oncology, and obstetrics and gynecology. Throughout their career, they have contributed extensively to cancer research, particularly in ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment as well as related cancer risks and factors.

Their recent publications include studies addressing various aspects of ovarian cancer and its risk factors. These publications are:

  • Association Between Breastfeeding and Ovarian Cancer Risk, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Prognostic gene expression signature for high-grade serous ovarian cancer, 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • The genomic and immune landscape of long-term survivors of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, 2022, Nature Genetics
  • Development and Validation of the Gene Expression Predictor of High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Molecular SubTYPE (PrOTYPE), 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Expanding Our Understanding of Ovarian Cancer Risk: The Role of Incomplete Pregnancies, 2020, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers, notably:

  • Celeste Leigh Pearce
  • Jennifer A. Doherty
  • Penelope M. Webb
  • Kathryn L. Terry
  • Marc T. Goodman

Malcolm C. Pike's work is commonly published in venues such as:

  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

The main fields of study for Pike include:

  • Medicine

They have also contributed to several specific subfields, including:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Cancer Research
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Their main topics of work encompass:

  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

In recognition of their contributions to medical research, Malcolm C. Pike was named a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

    R Peto;M C Pike;P Armitage;N E Breslow

  • Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design.

    R. Peto;M. C. Pike;P. Armitage;N. E. Breslow

  • Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease.

    Kirk E. Lohmueller;Celeste L. Pearce;Malcolm Pike;Eric S. Lander

  • Migration Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk in Asian-American Women

    Regina G. Ziegler;Robert N. Hoover;Malcolm C. Pike;Allan Hildesheim

  • Estrogens, Progestogens, Normal Breast Cell Proliferation, and Breast Cancer Risk

    Malcolm C. Pike;Darcy V. Spicer;Laila Dahmoush;Michael F. Press

  • INCREASED CELL DIVISION AS A CAUSE OF HUMAN CANCER

    Susan Preston-Martin;Malcolm C. Pike;Ronald K. Ross;Peter A. Jones

  • Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer - Collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58 515 women with breast cancer and 95 067 women without the disease

    N Hamajima;K Hirose;K Tajima;T Rohan

  • Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: Individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

    N. Hamajima;K. Hirose;K. Tajima;T. Rohan

  • A Multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: Baseline Characteristics

    Laurence N. Kolonel;Brian E. Henderson;Jean H. Hankin;Abraham M. Y. Nomura

  • Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies.

    Celeste Leigh Pearce;Claire Templeman;Mary Anne Rossing;Alice Lee

  • Conservatism of the approximation sigma (O-E)2-E in the logrank test for survival data or tumor incidence data.

    Richard Peto;M. C. Pike

  • The role of oestrogens and progestagens in the epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer

    T.J.A. Key;M.C. Pike

  • ‘Hormonal’ risk factors, ‘breast tissue age’ and the age-incidence of breast cancer

    M C Pike;M D Krailo;B E Henderson;J T Casagrande

  • Common Genetic Variation In Cellular Transport Genes and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk

    Ganna Chornokur;Hui-Yi Lin;Jonathan P. Tyrer;Kate Lawrenson

  • Type I and II Endometrial Cancers: Have They Different Risk Factors?

    Veronica Wendy Setiawan;Hannah P. Yang;Malcolm C. Pike;Malcolm C. Pike;Susan E. McCann;Susan E. McCann

  • Ethnic and Racial Differences in the Smoking-Related Risk of Lung Cancer

    Christopher A. Haiman;Daniel O. Stram;Lynne R. Wilkens;Malcolm C. Pike

  • Endogenous Hormones as a Major Factor in Human Cancer

    Brian E. Henderson;Ronald K. Ross;Malcolm C. Pike;John T. Casagrande

  • Multiple regions within 8q24 independently affect risk for prostate cancer.

    Christopher A Haiman;Nick Patterson;Matthew L Freedman;Matthew L Freedman;Simon R Myers

  • Estrogens and Endometrial Cancer in a Retirement Community

    Thomas M. Mack;Malcolm C. Pike;Brian E. Henderson;Robert I. Pfeffer

  • 5-alpha-reductase activity and risk of prostate cancer among Japanese and US white and black males.

    R.K. Ross;L. Bernstein;M.C. Pike;B.E. Henderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna H. Wu
Anna H. Wu University of Southern California
Brian E. Henderson
Brian E. Henderson University of Southern California
Jennifer A. Doherty
Jennifer A. Doherty University of Utah
Marc T. Goodman
Marc T. Goodman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Susan J. Ramus
Susan J. Ramus University of New South Wales
Joellen M. Schildkraut
Joellen M. Schildkraut University of Virginia
Laurence N. Kolonel
Laurence N. Kolonel University of Hawaii at Manoa
Andrew Berchuck
Andrew Berchuck Duke University
Daniel W. Cramer
Daniel W. Cramer Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary pathways in healthcare can open up diverse career opportunities aside from traditional medical school. One popular option is pursuing a master's in nursing, even for those without a nursing background. Fast-track direct entry online MSN programs allow non-nurses to enter advanced nursing roles more quickly and flexibly.

For those seeking a less competitive entry point, there are nursing schools with high acceptance rates that may be less daunting. These schools often offer accommodating admissions criteria, making nursing education more accessible.

Not everyone who wants a healthcare career wants to work directly with patients. Administrative roles such as medical billing and coding are in high demand and can be a smart choice. Many of the medical billing and coding financial aid programs online provide the support students need to get started.

Some future nurses prefer to avoid standardized testing during the admissions process. Several nursing school without teas test options are now available, removing a major barrier and streamlining the path to a healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm C. Pike

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles