World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
9154
World Ranking
6191
National Ranking
195

Mehmet A. Orgun publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet A. Orgun sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 361 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mehmet A. Orgun D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet A. Orgun sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mehmet A. Orgun is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with a significant emphasis on artificial intelligence and related subfields.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broader area, their subfields of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Their research spans key topics such as:

  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Topic Modeling
  • Access Control and Trust

Mehmet A. Orgun has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "A Survey on Session-based Recommender Systems" (2021), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "A Survey on Trust Prediction in Online Social Networks" (2020), published in IEEE Access
  • "Intention Nets: Psychology-Inspired User Choice Behavior Modeling for Next-Basket Prediction" (2020), published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Tumor attention networks: Better feature selection, better tumor segmentation" (2021), published in Neural Networks
  • "CTumorGAN: a unified framework for automatic computed tomography tumor segmentation" (2020), published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The scientist frequently collaborates with the following co-authors:

  • Quan Z. Sheng
  • Yan Wang
  • Shoujin Wang
  • Shuchao Pang
  • Anan Du

Their work appears regularly in these publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • World Wide Web
  • Scientific Reports
  • ACM Computing Surveys

Best Publications

  • Hybrid threshold adaptable quantum secret sharing scheme with reverse Huffman-Fibonacci-tree coding

    Hong Lai;Jun Zhang;Ming Xing Luo;Lei Pan

  • Sequential Recommender Systems: Challenges, Progress and Prospects

    Shoujin Wang;Liang Hu;Liang Hu;Yan Wang;Longbing Cao

  • A Survey on Session-based Recommender Systems

    Shoujin Wang;Longbing Cao;Yan Wang;Quan Z. Sheng

  • A reverse‐engineering approach to subsystem structure identification

    Hausi A. Müller;Mehmet A. Orgun;Scott R. Tilley;James S. Uhl

  • A Proof-of-Trust Consensus Protocol for Enhancing Accountability in Crowdsourcing Services

    Jun Zou;Bin Ye;Lie Qu;Yan Wang

  • A survey on real-time event detection from the Twitter data stream:

    Mahmud Hasan;Mehmet A Orgun;Rolf Schwitter

  • An Overview of Temporal and Modal Logic Programming

    Mehmet A. Orgun;Wanli Ma

  • Finding the Optimal Social Trust Path for the Selection of Trustworthy Service Providers in Complex Social Networks

    Guanfeng Liu;Yan Wang;Mehmet A. Orgun;Ee-Peng Lim

  • Real-time event detection from the Twitter data stream using the TwitterNews+ framework

    Mahmud Hasan;Mehmet A. Orgun;Mehmet A. Orgun;Rolf Schwitter

  • AI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence

    John Richard Thornton;Mehmet A. Orgun

  • Privacy Preservation in e-Healthcare Environments: State of the Art and Future Directions

    Muneeb Ahmed Sahi;Haider Abbas;Kashif Saleem;Xiaodong Yang

  • Graph learning based recommender systems: a review

    Shoujin Wang;Liang Hu;Yan Wang;Xiangnan He

  • Cloud Service Selection Based on the Aggregation of User Feedback and Quantitative Performance Assessment

    Lie Qu;Yan Wang;Mehmet A. Orgun

  • Optimal social trust path selection in complex social networks

    Guanfeng Liu;Yan Wang;Mehmet A. Orgun

  • Modeling multi-purpose sessions for next-item recommendations via mixture-channel purpose routing networks

    Shoujin Wang;Liang Hu;Liang Hu;Yan Wang;Quan Z. Sheng

  • A Deep Framework for Cross-Domain and Cross-System Recommendations.

    Feng Zhu;Yan Wang;Chaochao Chen;Guanfeng Liu

  • Trust transitivity in complex social networks

    Guanfeng Liu;Yan Wang;Mehmet A. Orgun

  • Trust management and trust theory revision

    Ji Ma;M.A. Orgun

  • A reverse engineering environment based on spatial and visual software interconnection models

    H. A. Müller;S. R. Tilley;M. A. Orgun;B. D. Corrie

  • Fast and simple high-capacity quantum cryptography with error detection.

    Hong Lai;Ming-Xing Luo;Josef Pieprzyk;Jun Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Yan Wang
Yan Wang Macquarie University
Josef Pieprzyk
Josef Pieprzyk Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Guanfeng Liu
Guanfeng Liu Macquarie University
Quan Z. Sheng
Quan Z. Sheng Macquarie University
Jalal Al-Muhtadi
Jalal Al-Muhtadi King Saud University
Jinghua Xiao
Jinghua Xiao Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Longbing Cao
Longbing Cao University of Technology Sydney
Abdelouahid Derhab
Abdelouahid Derhab King Saud University
Abdul Sattar
Abdul Sattar Griffith University
Vijay Varadharajan
Vijay Varadharajan University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of computer science is rapidly evolving, and online education has opened up new opportunities for students around the globe. Choosing one of the good online colleges ensures that you receive a quality education with flexible learning options to fit your lifestyle and needs.

If you are interested in a creative technology career, consider pursuing a game design online degree. This pathway equips graduates with the technical and storytelling skills essential for the booming video game industry.

As cybersecurity threats become more sophisticated, the demand for professionals with a cyber security bachelor degree online continues to grow. This degree prepares students for roles dedicated to protecting digital assets and sensitive information.

Alternatively, those interested in both technology and project management may explore an online construction management degree. This option merges organizational, technical, and leadership skills—ideal for overseeing construction technology projects.

Exploring these accredited and affordable online programs can help you tailor your education to fit specific career goals in the broad technology and engineering sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Mehmet A. Orgun

Trending Scientists